ADVERTISEMENT

*****Official Cubs 2024 Thread 🪦*****

Add an ace to an already solid rotation—probably Corbin Burnes.

Add a legit power bat. Soto would be great but that’s not happening. Go after Vlad.

Add a mother f*cking closer, for the love of god.

That’s it. That’s your playoff team.
Burnes is starting to noticeably lose velocity. Not to say he wouldn’t be a decent addition if correctly priced for the right years, but they have the makings of a staff, and I’d prefer they get Roki Sasaki if he is posted. Thats just a preference.
They need BP help from real MLB guys, not scrap heap guys or guys at the end of their careers. And, they need a guy who hits the ball out of the park. So, yes, the Jays are a team to trade with, especially because a larger deal might net them a catcher they could use.
 
Sport Nod GIF by Milwaukee Brewers

Flexing Milwaukee Brewers GIF by MLB

Regular Season Sport GIF by MLB
 
  • Like
Reactions: wausauhawk
Flip Off Good Night GIF by Way Nation


And, that's a wrap, folks.
Still, there are a few reasons to keep watching. Steele pitched today, which is nice. He needed to get back out there and pitch through his issue. Wesneski is in Chicago, so it would be a plus to get him back out on the mound. Let's see if PCA and Amaya can continue to progress. I'd like to see Hodge get a few more high leverage appearances.
 
Is $515 too high to bid for a Dansby Swanson 2 run home run ball from the combined no hitter versus the Pirates? Lots of stuff is up for bid from that game. I feel as if the game worn Michael Busch pants wouldn't look good on my wall.
 
Is $515 too high to bid for a Dansby Swanson 2 run home run ball from the combined no hitter versus the Pirates? Lots of stuff is up for bid from that game. I feel as if the game worn Michael Busch pants wouldn't look good on my wall.
Would be kind of cool piece of memorabilia. Is it signed? Also curious how one verifies that if it is just being sold by whoever caught it?
 
Would be kind of cool piece of memorabilia. Is it signed? Also curious how one verifies that if it is just being sold by whoever caught it?
Signed? I don’t know. I’ll go back in tonight and check. Every once in awhile during broadcasts they will show the “authenticator”. I assume every team has one. You will see a ball get rolled off the field and he immediately puts a sticker on it and scans it. If it’s truly historic, it goes the HoF. The last pitched ball of every no hitter goes to the HoF.
This one I assume has been verified, but who gave up the Cubs home run ball? Sometimes they get them from the bleachers if the player wants it, or it’s historic. But, why trade this one in?
It’s a guess, but the proceeds of the auctions are for charity, and maybe they offered a signed ball and told the person the game ball would generate nice revenue for charity? There are some base hit balls on the site, so I might look at them. Nuts go to the official Cubs site and you’ll find the auction tab.
 
Smyly needs to wake up tomorrow with a sore lat or something. He's been absolute garbage for 2 weeks.
 
Signed? I don’t know. I’ll go back in tonight and check. Every once in awhile during broadcasts they will show the “authenticator”. I assume every team has one. You will see a ball get rolled off the field and he immediately puts a sticker on it and scans it. If it’s truly historic, it goes the HoF. The last pitched ball of every no hitter goes to the HoF.
This one I assume has been verified, but who gave up the Cubs home run ball? Sometimes they get them from the bleachers if the player wants it, or it’s historic. But, why trade this one in?
It’s a guess, but the proceeds of the auctions are for charity, and maybe they offered a signed ball and told the person the game ball would generate nice revenue for charity? There are some base hit balls on the site, so I might look at them. Nuts go to the official Cubs site and you’ll find the auction tab.
There’s an “MLB Authentics” brand that sells a lot of this stuff. Bases to games, certain balls, broken bats, game-worn jerseys & pants. Anything from that service is fully authenticated. What’s harder are foul balls, certain home runs, balls tossed into the crowd by players after an inning, etc.
 
There’s an “MLB Authentics” brand that sells a lot of this stuff. Bases to games, certain balls, broken bats, game-worn jerseys & pants. Anything from that service is fully authenticated. What’s harder are foul balls, certain home runs, balls tossed into the crowd by players after an inning, etc.
This is on the Cubs site, and it says anything beyond operating costs goes to Cubs Charities. I agree on the point about foul balls, and homers. Anything that leaves the field of play has a little doubt to it. There is a ball listed that was a single by PCA, then a ground out. So, you know it is authentic. I might go for that.
Stuff like one of the bases from the no hitter are easy to authenticate, too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkifann
They just need to pay him out and not play him. that’s the magic answer.
I'd like to use the remaining games to give someone on the 40 man a shot. I suppose they are hesitant to have no lefties in the bullpen, but, he's garbage right now. Bring up Killian, or activate Wesneski... Anyone you think might be on the team next year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkifann
What are the Cubs' chances of making the playoffs?

According to Power Rankings Guru, the Cubs have less than a 1% chance of making the playoffs. FanGraphs puts the Cubs at a 0% chance to make the playoffs, even though they're not technically eliminated, yet.

The Cubs are three losses away from being eliminated from the playoffs. And every Mets win also strips the Cubs of a loss they can afford. Since the total number of losses the Mets can achieve this season is 79, the Cubs can only afford to take on three losses without the Mets winning.

As it stands, the Cubs are 77-75 on the season. They are 7.0 games back of the final NL Wild Card spot owned by the Mets. They also trail the Braves by 5.0 games, who own the first spot outside the NL Wild Card.

In essence, it's a long shot for the Cubs to make the playoffs.
 
What are the Cubs' chances of making the playoffs?

According to Power Rankings Guru, the Cubs have less than a 1% chance of making the playoffs. FanGraphs puts the Cubs at a 0% chance to make the playoffs, even though they're not technically eliminated, yet.

The Cubs are three losses away from being eliminated from the playoffs. And every Mets win also strips the Cubs of a loss they can afford. Since the total number of losses the Mets can achieve this season is 79, the Cubs can only afford to take on three losses without the Mets winning.

As it stands, the Cubs are 77-75 on the season. They are 7.0 games back of the final NL Wild Card spot owned by the Mets. They also trail the Braves by 5.0 games, who own the first spot outside the NL Wild Card.

In essence, it's a long shot for the Cubs to make the playoffs.

 
What are the Cubs' chances of making the playoffs?

According to Power Rankings Guru, the Cubs have less than a 1% chance of making the playoffs. FanGraphs puts the Cubs at a 0% chance to make the playoffs, even though they're not technically eliminated, yet.

The Cubs are three losses away from being eliminated from the playoffs. And every Mets win also strips the Cubs of a loss they can afford. Since the total number of losses the Mets can achieve this season is 79, the Cubs can only afford to take on three losses without the Mets winning.

As it stands, the Cubs are 77-75 on the season. They are 7.0 games back of the final NL Wild Card spot owned by the Mets. They also trail the Braves by 5.0 games, who own the first spot outside the NL Wild Card.

In essence, it's a long shot for the Cubs to make the playoffs.

Plus the Mets and Braves play each other in a 3-game series so one of those two teams is guaranteed two wins.
 
This is on the Cubs site, and it says anything beyond operating costs goes to Cubs Charities. I agree on the point about foul balls, and homers. Anything that leaves the field of play has a little doubt to it. There is a ball listed that was a single by PCA, then a ground out. So, you know it is authentic. I might go for that.
Stuff like one of the bases from the no hitter are easy to authenticate, too.
On our last trip to Wrigley, my youngest got his first ball. The last batter of the inning grounded out to Paredes who threw to Busch. Busch tossed the ball over the net and my kid got it. We know what the ball was, but zero chance of authentication (not a big deal, the game wasn’t special), but we know and at Cubs Con next year, he’s going to try to get Paredes’ and Busch’s autographs on it.

This is why when there’s a late-season HR chase, the league provides umps with some specially marked balls. It does give the conspiracy theorists something to glom onto, but the point is that those balls have a special marking so they can be authenticated later as Judge’s 62nd, etc.
 
Plus the Mets and Braves play each other in a 3-game series so one of those two teams is guaranteed two wins.
Not that it matters, but clearly the Cubs would need either a Braves sweep or at least a Braves series win.
 
On our last trip to Wrigley, my youngest got his first ball. The last batter of the inning grounded out to Paredes who threw to Busch. Busch tossed the ball over the net and my kid got it. We know what the ball was, but zero chance of authentication (not a big deal, the game wasn’t special), but we know and at Cubs Con next year, he’s going to try to get Paredes’ and Busch’s autographs on it.

This is why when there’s a late-season HR chase, the league provides umps with some specially marked balls. It does give the conspiracy theorists something to glom onto, but the point is that those balls have a special marking so they can be authenticated later as Judge’s 62nd, etc.
Rizzo tossed my oldest daughter a ball from an inning ending double play in a win against the Reds many years ago. It was year two of the rebuild, I think. Chilly week day with about 6000 people there, and we were right at the end of the dugout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkifann
Rizzo tossed my oldest daughter a ball from an inning ending double play in a win against the Reds many years ago. It was year two of the rebuild, I think. Chilly week day with about 6000 people there, and we were right at the end of the dugout.
Those are great moments.
 
KA already on the 40-man and OC will be added in Nov. MS and MB don't need to be added, but they both look like they'll be too good for AAA next season. And Triantos isn't even on the list. Cubs have got to make room for these guys next season or reluctantly trade some of them to improve the team. Jed cannot spend another off-season sitting on his ass again....
 

This is an article that has been posted on The Athletic

Craig Counsell sees ‘big gap’ between Cubs and division-champion Brewers​



CINCINNATI, OHIO - JULY 31: Craig Counsell  #30 the manager of the Chicago Cubs  watches the action in the game against the  Cincinnati Reds at Great American Ball Park on July 31, 2024 in Cincinnati, Ohio. (Photo by Andy Lyons/Getty Images)

By Patrick Mooney
Sep 19, 2024
271


CHICAGO — Chicago Cubs manager Craig Counsell refused to sugarcoat his team’s slow fade from the playoff picture, sending a message to the entire organization that changes in Wrigleyville need to happen fast.
Counsell delivered that reality check the day after the Milwaukee Brewers clinched the division title, his low-key voice rising with a different edge and a new sense of urgency. Counsell leaving his hometown team to become the sport’s highest-paid manager was supposed to shift the balance of power in the National League Central, not usher in a season of wire-to-wire dominance by his former club.
Advertisement

“There’s a big gap,” Counsell said Thursday. “They’re ahead of us by a lot. It’s a talented team. On and off the field, that’s a talented team. There’s a big gap, and we got room to make up. There’s no question about it. Frankly, that makes it daunting.”
Counsell spoke in the Wrigley Field interview room where the pregame media briefings usually revolve around softball questions and happy talk. Counsell’s postgame sessions with reporters are almost always short and to the point — a recognition that it’s a long season and the manager rarely pops off in that setting.
At this point, though, there’s no hiding from the standings. The Brewers have spent every day in first place since the end of April — even after trading away Cy Young Award winner Corbin Burnes last winter — while the Cubs have struggled to gain traction above the .500 level that signifies mediocrity.
Counsell didn’t dispute the observation that he sounded as animated as he’s been all year.
“Yeah, I mean, we got to get better, man,” Counsell said. “The team we’re chasing is 10 games ahead of us. We got to get better. And we should be trying to build 90-win teams here. That’s like what you have to do. That’s a playoff standard. That’s what you got to get to, to be safely in the playoffs, safely in the tournament. Right? So from that perspective, we got a ways to go.”
Notice how Counsell didn’t use injuries as an excuse or try to sell false hope about this team being really, really close. There was no filibuster highlighting a good clubhouse culture and a strong pitching infrastructure. There were no promises about a magical farm system. Every level of a multibillion-dollar organization should be paying attention.
The Ricketts family authorized a major-league payroll that’s projected to finish this year around or slightly above the $237 million luxury-tax threshold. But in terms of spending, the Cubs have been surpassed by the aggressive owners who run franchises like the New York Mets and Philadelphia Phillies. So far, the methodical, rational approach simply hasn’t been good enough.
GettyImages-2164292170-scaled.jpg


Three of Craig Counsell’s Brewers teams finished with over 90 wins: “That’s a playoff standard.” (Jason Mowry / Getty Images)
Jed Hoyer’s baseball operations department has acquired dazzling talents such as Shota Imanaga and Pete Crow-Armstrong, and improved the pitching pipeline that produced Justin Steele. The Cubs have a solid lineup of above-average, two-way players as well as an expanded pool of intriguing prospects. But with 2025 looming as the final season of Hoyer’s five-year contract, the team president will be under intense pressure to produce a roster that breaks through an 83-win ceiling.
Advertisement

Firing David Ross and hiring Counsell away from Milwaukee was one way that Hoyer hoped to gain ground in the NL Central. Counsell declined to go into specific recommendations that he will make to Hoyer’s front office: “Do you want me to share them with you?”
Yes.
“No, I’m not going to do that,” Counsell said.
Counsell indicated that he already congratulated Milwaukee manager Pat Murphy, his longtime bench coach and old college coach at Notre Dame.
How do the Brewers seem to outperform expectations year after year?
“I think I just (said that) — talented people on and off the field,” Counsell said.
Counsell didn’t come into this job acting like he already knew all the answers or needed to put his imprint on the team. He agreed with the assessment that he spent his first season in Chicago studying the organization and contemplating the best path forward.
“You’re always doing that,” Counsell said. “You’re also trying to make immediate change, for sure, to help us be better. So those are both true. And you continue to do both.”
Given Counsell’s influence within the organization, it’s hard to imagine the Cubs sticking with the status quo. Hoyer hired Counsell, who once worked in Milwaukee’s front office, with the idea of creating a partnership. A manager with a five-year, $40 million contract doesn’t just sit through the daily press conferences and make the in-game decisions. Counsell surely has ideas about R&D, scouting, player development, roster construction and free agents.
Counsell added “the whole division” will be facing this challenge: “I would say that about the other teams, too.” But the Cubs are the team that Counsell chose, the big-market franchise 90 miles south of Milwaukee that has once again underachieved: “They’ve created a gap the last two years in the division. Yeah, we got room to go, man. We got work to do, for sure.”
(Top photo of Craig Counsell, who on Thursday acknowledged a wide gap between the Cubs and his former team, the NL Central champion Brewers: Andy Lyons / Getty Images)

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/57...&campaign=601983&userId=10343484&redirected=1
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT