Well I can guarantee nobody going to the games is not good for the program. So I guess it's on you if you want to contribute to that.
There are fans and there are consumers. Fans always support the program and understand it is their role to do so. It's the difference between "what can I do for the team?", and "what can the team do for me?"
I can guarantee that going 26 years without ever once making the second weekend of the tournament is not good for the program.
I can guarantee that going 46 years without ever winning a regular season title is not good for the program.
I can guarantee that consistently playing a joke non con schedule, and going entire seasons without ever even getting a single top 25 vote is not good for the program.
I can guarantee that consistently fielding the worst defense in the conference is not good for the program.
I can guarantee that getting embarrassed in multiple games is not good for the program.
I can guarantee that losing to Minnesota (the worst team in the league) at home is not good for the program.
I can guarantee that a 2 year drought of missing the NCAA Tournament altogether is not good for the program.
Which of the above is the fault of the fans? Which of the above could fans change?
It's not anybody's "role" to mindlessly waste time and money on something that they don't enjoy. lol who assigns these "roles"? Superfans like you? smh
You should talk to Beth. Suggest she begin a fan shaming campaign to fill the stands. A campaign that explains to them how their selfish consumer like behavior is hurting the program. I think it might turn things around
LMAO
You're goofy.