ADVERTISEMENT

Progressivism is...elitism

Is this list an accurate reflection of the progressive movement?


  • Total voters
    19
Like every "ism", it means different things to different people.

Everything in moderation!
Which makes having a discussion about such things with a lying weasel like natty so fruitless. His penchant for shifting the meaning of words within his own arguments to suit his own ends is legendary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nat Algren
The Progressives were an economically secure, highly articulate group which reflected the rise of new middle class elements, particularly professionals. And, like the Constitutional Founders, they viewed themselves as the educated elite alone capable of giving effective government and dispensing justice.' Substantively, progressivism was allegedly dedicated to the "conviction that the functions of government . . . [were] too restricted and that they must be increased and extended to relieve social and economic distress."

Alan Stone
 
The Progressives mindset:

It is in this context that we can integrate the findings concerning the elitism of some of the major progressive figures. Mowry is worth quoting extensively here: . . . [Blenign change scarcely issued from the masses. Rather it was only accomplished through the instrumentality of a few great and good men. Woodrow Wilson believed that efficient government could come only from an "educated elite", William Kent thought that progress never came from the bottom, and Roosevelt often spoke of government as the process of "giving justice from above". . . . In 1912 Walter Lippmann wrote that since men could do anything but govern themselves, they were constantly looking for some "benevolent guardian." To the progressive politician that guardian, of course, was patterned after his image of himself.

Alan Stone
 
Progressivism's first cornerstone, then, was the construction of new institutions and political devices that would reduce public participation in political decision-making.

Alan Stone
 
Ouch

Rule by expert received its first major impetus before the Progressive Era and is also connected with a related development in the business sector-the development of scientific management.

Alan Stone
 
From what we have seen thus far, the insulation of the public from public affairs might take place in a variety of ways. The use of experts presumably operating outside the realm of politics, as if experts do not have values and need not make choices based upon them, was one of the major mechanisms. The regulatory agency which vested a great deal of discretion in these "experts" was one of the most important mechanisms. And the "experts," taking their alleged expertise very seriously, complied by employing an exotic vocabulary which most of the public could not understand and therefore lost interest in-a legacy of progressivism still very much with us.

Alan Stone
 
The legacy of progressivism has been that more and more activities once considered political have fallen into the hands of administrators and experts. Of course, the interests represented among the experts have expanded from the businessmen and middle class reformers characteristic of the Progressive Era. Militarists, environmentalists, feminists, etc. are imposing their values upon the rest of society. And in some ways administrators have become sorcerers' apprentices, developing interests aside from those of the groups which helped establish them-the FTC, for example. The courts, too, have become experts and administrators in such matters as civil rights and education. Thus, school busing to achieve the goals of integration is mandated notwithstanding the overwhelming poll opposition of black and white parents. But, at last, popular resentment at the work-or more accurately failures-of administrators has become a virtual groundswell.

Alan Stone
 
Like every "ism", it means different things to different people.

Everything in moderation!
Moderation? Moderation?! Like FBnBB?!?!!?!

source.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: strummingram
Torbee says that this is progressivism do the board "progressives" agree?


A truly progressive movement is against corruption. It is fundamentally opposed to the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of the few at the expense of the many.

A truly progressive movement is against oppression. Progressive movements have always fought, and must continue to fight, for the vulnerable and underprivileged — workers, the sick and powerless, and every other minority group that is marginalized by existing power structures.

A truly progressive movement is against discrimination. We are an egalitarian movement, with a belief in the fundamental equality of human beings. Discrimination is a form of oppression, and a movement cannot be egalitarian and against oppression while tolerating discrimination.

A truly progressive movement is against privatization of the public sphere. We must be fundamentally opposed to the mass privatization of goods and services that should remain public: healthcare, education, and other necessities for a decent life.

A truly progressive movement is for democracy. Democracy is more than voting at the ballot box. Democracy is the constant pursuit of civic engagement and public involvement in the direction of society. Without democracy, the fundamentally American principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are unattainable.

The progressive movement is for transparency. If we the people do not know what is happening in the halls of power — whether in the Capitol building, the statehouse, or the corporate boardroom — we cannot hold power accountable.

The progressive movement is thus for accountability of those in power. In the modern era, this includes the fight to get big money out of the political process and to reform the electoral system so that we can elect those who are best fit to serve the people, not simply the powerful.

A truly progressive movement is for freedom of the press, also known as “the fourth estate.” The purpose of the press is to combine transparency, accountability, and education. Without a free and responsible media, we will never be able to inform the public or hold power accountable.

The progressive movement is for non-violence. While there are examples in the past of violence in progressive movements, these were aberrations and desperate last resorts, not fundamental strategies of the movement.

Attaining these goals is impossible in a state of anarchy. Thus, anyone who is truly progressive opposes anarchy.

Principles of a Modern Progressive Movement
Lol OP is the only “no” vote. What a jackass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT