Face it. You outkicked your coverage here, against someone with an actual physics and math degree.
Take the L. Move on.
PSA: Starship's 4th Integrated Test Flight tentatively June 6
- Thread starter Phenomenally Frantastic
- Start date
Face it. You outkicked your coverage here, against someone with an actual physics and math degree.
Take the L. Move on.
And, BTW, mining of asteroids in the belt can be done robotically. But I’ll bet people will be there too.
Oh Jesus! Someone with a physics and math degree?!?!
I think I might faint.
Well, I worked for NASA and I have science degrees and a law degree as well. So get bent.
BTW, Ws or Ls on this board are meaningless. The fact that you think they count just is a testament to your insecurity.
LMAO. The Twitter links I used were from an aerospace engineer. What’s weird is multiple engines failing, a destroyed launch pad, and an out of control rocket that was detonated before it exploded or crashed in ocean is being breathlessly hailed as a success. They were in reality set back YEARS from this test. We won’t likely see another test flight of Starship for sure this year and probably the next, from what I am reading.
SpaceX has had great success. I like and root for them. They are having some issues with this one, and there should be no reason to spin it.
Sure, Jan.
That's why you didn't understand how bringing asteroids back to Earth was so fundamentally basic.
Cleaning toilets at NASA doesn't count here.
Someone should have cleaned you out of the toilet long ago, Wingwong.
It’ll happen within 3 months. It was an uncrewed flight, for Christ’s sake! Nobody died or was injured. The launch pad was damaged because SpaceX stupidly didn’t install flame dampening. They will next launch.
Stop acting like this was an abject failure. It was not.
No; they do not.
The moon orbits the Earth just like smaller satellites do. It just has a much larger impact on Earth e.g. tides, etc.
LMAO. You want to make a legit bet on this? They literally have no launch pad and have to redesign
Indeed. There is a lot of redesign needed and new round of FAA clearance. This was a bad bad launch. I mean, yeah it is epic they got a huge rocket to lift off ground for about 2,000 feet before all hell broke lose and it destroyed launch pad and they had to blow up as it did cartwheels over the gulf. They have a ton of work to do to make this viable.
What?? You have a physics degree and you are somehow claiming that mass and inertia have no effect on orbital mechanics??
Really????
That’s what you think. Like I said, ever see the launch pad after a Space Shuttle launch?
Yes. Clearly you have not since you keep acting like they were static pads with no diversion. Your fan boys are simply incredible. Why cantbyou admit it was bad.
Here is a more recent and applicable article on minimum damage done by Artemis launch. You in for a bet on 90 days to next test ?
NASA Assesses Launch Pad for Damage After Launch of the World’s Most Powerful Rocket
Following the successful Artemis I liftoff of the world’s most powerful rocket from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida, teams carefully assessed the mobile launcher and infrastructure at Launch Pad 39B. Engineers have determined that the overall mobile launcher and pad systems all performed as d
scitechdaily.com
Probably more like 6 months.
Not what I'd posted at all.
The governing MECHANICS and EQUATIONS are NOT DIFFERENT or DEPENDENT on the mass of the objects.
F=MA
You have a bigger rock, you need ion thrusters to provide MORE FORCE to obtain the same acceleration.
F/M = A
2F/2M = A
10,000F/10,000M=A
I got news for you buttboys. The FAA isn’t gonna be all that concerned about the damage to the pad. They know why it happened. SpaceX knows why it happened. It’s an easy fix, as I’ve said. They simply didn’t put in the necessary flame dampening tech. Dumb-admittedly.Yes. Clearly you have not since you keep acting like they were static pads with no diversion. Your fan boys are simply incredible. Why cantbyou admit it was bad.
Here is a more recent and applicable article on minimum damage done by Artemis launch. You in for a bet on 90 days to next test ?
NASA Assesses Launch Pad for Damage After Launch of the World’s Most Powerful Rocket
Following the successful Artemis I liftoff of the world’s most powerful rocket from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida, teams carefully assessed the mobile launcher and infrastructure at Launch Pad 39B. Engineers have determined that the overall mobile launcher and pad systems all performed as dscitechdaily.com
But fixable and not fatal. Get over it.
Certainly not breathless success. Certainly not abject failure. Certainly somewhere in the middle.
Nowhere in that rant did I hear you accepting YOUR 90 day bet…buttboy. LMAO. You are borderline pathetic.
I can live with that. Go talk to the peeps claiming it was awesome and a success.
PS it is way closer to abject failure. Basically a participation trophy for not exploding on pad.
Despite an explosion, Elon Musk is closer to his new space age
SpaceX’s Starship spacecraft is far more advanced than its competitors
Despite an explosion, Elon Musk is closer to his new space age
SpaceX’s Starship spacecraft is far more advanced than its competitors
Lol…I wrote them. I know what I posted. And I know you’re a f’n liar.
And we could throw that dope Joe’s Place in the same slime with you two.
What you complete twits don’t understand (other than your mutual circle jerk hatred for Musk) is that you are about to be swamped by the private and government space industry.
Do you have any idea how much the frequency of space launches has increased? From once a year in 2011 to once a month in 2016, to once a week in 2021, and now even more frequently.
You MEffers are just complete archaic dumbasses. Get with the program, Buggyboys!
Oh, so the 2019 cybertruck is being delivered in 2024? #justintime
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
Happened Upon Iowa Football and MBB Player Panels from Dubuque
- Latest: Eliot Clough
-