The only ones I remember was the two dumb asses from the Eno Benjamin debacle, and they deserved to be shown the door. I'm not sure if "Soup" Campbell was fired or moved on his own.Kirk has fired a few people, but never during the season.
The only ones I remember was the two dumb asses from the Eno Benjamin debacle, and they deserved to be shown the door. I'm not sure if "Soup" Campbell was fired or moved on his own.Kirk has fired a few people, but never during the season.
Yes, it's hard to know about Soup or, more recently, Copeland, but they most likely were strongly encouraged to move along to avoid firing. Giving someone that option fits your overall point about Kirk's loyalty to staff. Kennedy likely knew his employment was contingent on GDGD being the OC. I'd wager Kaz was fired, though, along with the two "dumb asses."The only ones I remember was the two dumb asses from the Eno Benjamin debacle, and they deserved to be shown the door. I'm not sure if "Soup" Campbell was fired or moved on his own.
Soup was "not renewed". A Greg Davis casualty.The only ones I remember was the two dumb asses from the Eno Benjamin debacle, and they deserved to be shown the door. I'm not sure if "Soup" Campbell was fired or moved on his own.
Jees, Kaz was a long time ago. Not sure if he was "fired" or just told to move along. I remember he was an Ass though and nobody on the staff could stand the guy...Yes, it's hard to know about Soup or, more recently, Copeland, but they most likely were strongly encouraged to move along to avoid firing. Giving someone that option fits your overall point about Kirk's loyalty to staff. Kennedy likely knew his employment was contingent on GDGD being the OC. I'd wager Kaz was fired, though, along with the two "dumb asses."
He might be a strong offensive mind, but his play calling is basic and bland and predictable.Actually, I disagree. Harrell has a strong offensive mind. I don't think that the problem was with the OC.
Probably ain't gonna work out anyway and you aren't getting someone from elsewhere mid-season. Some other dude on the staff maybe calling the same plays a little different.I didn't think you were allowed to that ever, let alone mid-season?! That's crazy that no one on the Iowa staff realized you could fire an OC, hell maybe they still don't. I guess thankfully for us BF's contract ended up expiring for whatever reason (guessing they couldn't work out the numbers?).
That's usually a reflection of what the guys can show they can handle.He might be a strong offensive mind, but his play calling is basic and bland and predictable.
They lived by tampering/poaching, so I don't mind them dying by it!A few things about the Purdue O ...
Purdue's lost to a number of decent teams. However, the big head-scratcher was the fact that the D gave up 66 points to Notre Dame ... and well over 500 yards. Given that the head coach is a "defensive guy" ... it would seem like the OC was treated as the sacrificial lamb in order to deflect attention from a middling defense ... particularly given that the head coach was supposed to be a "defensive genius."
- Last year between the QBs and OL, Purdue gave up 24 sacks through the ENTIRE season.
- This year, through 4 games, Purdue has given up 11 sacks! This is not going to help the QB's state-of-mind in the passing game if he doesn't feel like his pass-pro is going to hold up.
- Purdue lost its 3 top pass-catchers to other programs ... is that due to NIL? Purdue fans could likely help on this one. Anyhow, bleeding out your veteran talent is hard to build from. The Hawks saw the same thing when we lost a bunch of our WRs to the transfer portal a few years back.
- Despite the above issues ... the Purdue QB is statistically better than he was the prior season. Through a season, last year, Card threw for 15 TDs and had a completion-percentage of 58.9%. Through 4 games, Card has thrown for 7 TDs and has a completion-percentage of 65.9%. Given that Harrell was a former QB and specializes in QB development ... it would appear as though there was some definite progress made there.
I mean, there are plays in the playbook that can help this offense be successful. Just don’t run 73% of your passing routes as straight lines or curls. And don’t have an offense that is over 80% predictable on formations alone.That's usually a reflection of what the guys can show they can handle.
The pass-pro already illustrates that there are inconsistencies there. Furthermore, Purdue has a bunch of mercenary WRs. The problem sometimes with getting guys who already think that they know what they're doing is that you have to reteach them how to do things right. That unlearning process can sometimes be a rocky road ...
Pretty ballsy move by the head coach.
Ryan Walters had never called an offense before last week. Hard to argue with the results.
The Boilermakers coach revealed at what point last week he decided to call the offense and whether he will do so going forward.www.indystar.com
You would think a good DC would be good at knowing what will beat the defense.Pretty ballsy move by the head coach.
Ryan Walters had never called an offense before last week. Hard to argue with the results.
The Boilermakers coach revealed at what point last week he decided to call the offense and whether he will do so going forward.www.indystar.com
True. But there's also a risk of it didn't pay off. Maybe he just said, "f**k it, I can't be any worse than the other guy."You would think a good DC would be good at knowing what will beat the defense.