I can tell you are a product of public education. Lol 😂
I can tell you are a product of public education. Lol 😂
Do you normally come unhinged this easily?Try constructing a coherent sentence in English, retard.
Yeah, sure, you’re quite the history buff.
It's starting to trend that way.Not even Iowa is that stupid.
Try reading some history I think you be enlightened.
I can tell you are a product of public education. Lol 😂
What do you in mean before slavery became an issue? Slavery was an issue at the founding of the nation. The time before slavery was an issue doesn't exist in American history.Prior to slavery becoming an issue wealthy industrialists in the north were plotting to undermine the wealth of the south. The winds of a conflict were brewing well before slavery became an issue.
Probably A Memoir of the Last Year of the War for Independence, in the Confederate States of America by Jubal Early.What books do you recommend that would validate your position?
Actually he was. Read a book.Lee wasn't a United States leader either.
I thought it was called the Confederate States of America. Is this not true?Actually he was. Read a book.
Do you have some recommendations? I'm guessing Red Fish Blue Fish, Hop On Pop, or Goodnight Moon.Actually he was. Read a book.
Prior to slavery becoming an issue wealthy industrialists in the north were plotting to undermine the wealth of the south. The winds of a conflict were brewing well before slavery became an issue.
I like guys who don’t get caught.Why would any or state specifically celebrate such a notorious loser? The guy was alarmingly bad at his job, and contributed to a ton of unnecessary death and destruction.
His legacy is failure.
There was nothing united about the States back then due in large part to scum like Robert E Lee and the rest of the southern traitors. You seem to have adapted well to to being one of the modern confederates down there in the redneck riviera but Lee should have been hung and put on display like the rest of those treasonous pieces of shit for all the real Americans they murdered in order to preserve slaveryRebels shouldn’t have holidays in the US.
That said I think Robert E. Lee might be the best general produced in the United States….even if he was a major leader of a rebellion.
Chancellorsville might be the best victory by any American general in any war…outnumbered almost 2 to 1…splits his forces. Routs the Union army…only thing that save the Army of the Potomac from getting completely annihilated was darkness…
Amazon product ASIN 0062116290Do you have some recommendations? I'm guessing Red Fish Blue Fish, Hop On Pop, or Goodnight Moon.
Why don't you save me time and quote the part that says he was a United States of America leader?
Hooker had 130k troops and Lee 60k at Chancellorsville. Lee’s army was numerically inferior in pretty much every major engagement of the war…Chancellorsville was a tactical success but Lee has been glorified as part of the lost cause narrative. Lee lost nearly 20% of his forces at Chancellorsville which was proportionately worse than Union forces. The south could never afford these costs for what ultimately were limited gains.
His overall approach was flawed. His aggressive tactics has no chance of being successful as a long term strategy. His victories were always costly. He was mostly absent at Gettysburg compared to Meade and he didn't listen to his officers who told him that continuing the battle would be a disaster. He had limited consideration for logistics. He couldn't see the big picture and was too willing to sacrifice his men.
Lee ignored Longstreet, who had a plan to win the war that was 50 years ahead of its time.Hooker had 130k troops and Lee 60k at Chancellorsville. Lee’s army was numerically inferior in pretty much every major engagement of the war…
Agree Gettysburg was his worst battle…
Considering the numerical and material disparities Lee confronted it’s pretty amazing the Army of Northern Virginia lasted as long as it did…
Ok…Lee ignored Longstreet who had an actual plan to win the war that was 50 years ahead of its time. The man was a loser.
Lee attacked the North and engaged them on open battlefields. Longstreet wanted to force the North to attack the South and he wanted to use trench warfare to control the battlefield.
I guess Castro was too then?He was an American leader.
If that’s your take go with it.I guess Castro was too then?
A full year after JEB Stuart pulled the same shit multiple times and should have been relieved of command.
Why are the traitors to a nation regarded as heroes of the right?
Why are the traitors to a nation regarded as heroes of the right?
Pretty interestingLee attacked the North and engaged them on open battlefields. Longstreet wanted to force the North to attack the South and he wanted to use trench warfare to control the battlefield.
It probably would have worked.
“Leadership 101”?When did I ever say that?
“Leadership 101”?
Also, check out the rest of this thread.
You can certainly take snippets from anyone’s out leadership. Sorry if I took your post for something it wasn’t.It's a great scene about leadership. The handling of discipline, firmly making your point clear, not accepting excuses, letting them down softly and building them back up. And just as important, once done...moving on.
Lee was a distinguished officer in the United States Army before switching his allegiance to the confederacy.Actually he was. Read a book.
You can certainly take snippets from anyone’s out leadership. Sorry if I took your post for something it wasn’t.
Uhhhhh, yes he wasRobert lee wasn’t an American leader either.
After seceding from the United States he wasn't.Uhhhhh, yes he was
Why don't you save me time and quote the part that says he was a United States of America leader?
I refer you to post #112.Mexican–American War
Robert E. Lee around age 43, when he was a brevet lieutenant-colonel of engineers, c. 1850
Lee distinguished himself in the Mexican–American War (1846–1848). He was one of Winfield Scott's chief aides in the march from Veracruz to Mexico City.[37] He was instrumental in several American victories through his personal reconnaissance as a staff officer; he found routes of attack that the Mexicans had not defended because they thought the terrain was impassable.
He was promoted to brevet major after the Battle of Cerro Gordo on April 18, 1847.[38] He also fought at Contreras, Churubusco, and Chapultepec and was wounded at the last. By the end of the war, he had received additional brevet promotions to lieutenant colonel and colonel, but his permanent rank was still captain of engineers, and he would remain a captain until his transfer to the cavalry in 1855.
For the first time, Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant met and worked with each other during the Mexican–American War. Close observations of their commanders constituted a learning process for both Lee and Grant.[39] The Mexican–American War concluded on February 2, 1848.
There you go you ****ing idiot.
Not disagreeing with that at all. Just saying he was at one time a leader the US army As the other poster is clearly a dolt.I refer you to post #112.