What do you think electing him did for the image of this country?Yes I did and yes it would.
What do you think electing him did for the image of this country?Yes I did and yes it would.
He didn't get elected to go to Washington and coddle anyone.
He said they'll let you do it, not I did it. But you keep spinning, spinning spinning. #ProudOfYouWhat does that have to do with him admitting to grabbing women by the vaginas?
You dizzy yet?He said they'll let you do it, not I did it. But you keep spinning, spinning spinning. #ProudOfYou
He said they'll let you do it, not I did it. But you keep spinning, spinning spinning. #ProudOfYou
What does that have to do with him admitting to grabbing women by the vaginas?
This...exactly.Trump is the most reprehensible person - by far - to ever serve as POTUS. He is a vile, disgusting, sorry excuse for a human being who has not a single redeeming quality.
Yes, I take joy in knowing that his character is being exposed. It should have happened years ago. It was obvious to anyone paying attention and should have prevented him from ever sniffing ANY elected office much less the presidency. And even with everything that is known about him - there are still people here who will defend him. Maybe you should take your shots at them.
Pick one.
Gates testimony, i.e., the words Gates said, is a matter of record and not hearsay. What IS hearsay however, is what Gates is saying Trump. It's textbook hearsay.
Text book hearsay is a statement made out of court that is offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Gates repeating what Trump said, i.e., "more will be coming," is not being offered as proof that more Wikileaks were going to be issued, but offered to prove Trump had notice of Stone and Wikileaks involvement with leaking the hacked emails.
Wow. Just wow.He said they'll let you do it, not I did it. But you keep spinning, spinning spinning. #ProudOfYou
You are incorrect. Impeachment is a trial of fact, even if it is a political function. I'm not sure why you would think otherwise.
As far as the opinion that a sitting POTUS can't be indicted, there's no basis for that in the Constitution. A POTUS can be charged criminally, and also be impeached. Impeachment is the mechanism to remove him from office.
it is admissible.
Correct, that’s what we are all saying.
sounds like a present sense impression
No; present sense impression would be Gates testifying that Trump said "they were going really fast" or some other condition or statement of the event. For example, "Trump said: there was a fire in the kitchen."
Distasteful was electing and then defending him. Removing him will restore some honor to the country.
You're obviously incapable of divesting the simple logic from the subject matter of "Orange Man Bad" here.Text book hearsay is a statement made out of court that is offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Gates repeating what Trump said, i.e., "more will be coming," is not being offered as proof that more Wikileaks were going to be issued, but offered to prove Trump had notice of Stone and Wikileaks involvement with leaking the hacked emails.
Delicious? You take joy in a scandal involving the POTUS? That's pretty pathetic.
Taking joy in people being held accountable for criminal actions is far from "pathetic".
It's awesome.
Is it "pathetic" when a known child molester gets The Chair, or is imprisoned for life, to you?