ADVERTISEMENT

SC vs A&M

just watched the hilites, USC always has several really top receivers. They grow them on trees in S Cali.
They do. Always have. It's a problem that Iowa doesn’t have a receiver on the roster that would ever see the field at places like USC, Oregon, or OSU. Hell, I'd wager that you could add another 50 schools to that list. Something needs to change in that regard if Iowa is going to turn things around offensively. I'm skeptical that The Gift is the guy to do it.
 
I have a friend who is a tAm alumnus. We both agree, we shit the bed equally. We merely spend less money, which puts us barely ahead in the bed sh!T race.
Iowa?

They are not even within shouting distance of shitting the bed at the level of TAMU. Iowa gets their ass kicked by teams with more talent, with the occasional bed shitting. A&M goes 6-6 with more 4 and 5 star players in one class than Iowa has had in their history. Just shitting all over themselves year in and year out.
 
A lot of very messy sleeping places in this thread...but didn't A&M spend like a bajillion dollars on plyers in the couple of years?

If so, they should look into getting their mobey back. :)
 
Based on money spent, recruiting rankings and resources it’s not even close. A & M thinks of themselves as a top 10 program but continue to lose games like this year in year out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TXHCHawk
just watched the hilites, USC always has several really top receivers. They grow them on trees in S Cali.
You're not wrong at all. Makai Lemon and Ja'Kobi Lane are talented and were highly ranked prospects. USC lost some solid receivers to the portal but still have plenty of talent.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT