ADVERTISEMENT

School food vendor apologizes — again — for 'inexcusable' Black History Month menu

The only thing we know for sure is syrup has no business getting on chicken or eggs and hashbrowns or anything else besides pancakes and waffles and French toast. Separate plate absolutely required.
What about dipping sausage links or patties in syrup?
 
  • Like
Reactions: McLovin32
On a public school lunch menu. Chicken and waffles definitely aren't rare.

But that isn't what you said. LOL

They are in the North. Again, this is not a big deal but you aren't going to find chicken and waffles in Iowa other than a Soul food restaurant. There might be a few exceptions but rare.

Dumb argument. I am out. Chicken and waffles aren't rare, at all.
 
I stand by that chicken and waffles aren't found in all that many places in Iowa. The metros will have it but that's mostly it.
I put two kids through public school in a relatively urban/suburban school district in Iowa and I am almost 100% certain waffles and chicken were never on a lunch menu together and I GUARANTEE there was never a combo of chicken, waffles and watermelon.

Yes, chicken and waffles are an increasingly popular item at some restaurants these days, but trying to act like its a staple school lunch item is ludicrous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: globalhawk
I don't care enough to read all five pages of this thread, but it did encourage me to look up the history of Chicken and Waffles. Apologies if this has already been posted:

A traditional story about the origin of the dish in soul food states that because African Americans in the South rarely had the opportunity to eat chicken and were more familiar with flapjacks or pancakes than with waffles, they considered the dish a delicacy. For decades, it remained "a special-occasion meal in African American families."[10] Other historians, however, cite a scarcity of early evidence of the dish's existence in the South; they place the origin later, after the post-Civil War migration of Southern African-Americans to the North during the Reconstruction Era. The combination of chicken and waffles does not appear in early Southern cookbooks such as Mrs. Porter’s Southern Cookery Book, published in 1871, or in What Mrs. Fisher Knows About Old Southern Cooking, published in 1881 by former slave Abby Fisher.[11] Fisher's cookbook is generally considered the first cookbook written by an African American.[10] The lack of a recipe for the combination of chicken and waffles in Southern cookbooks from the era may suggest a later origin for the dish. Popular culture may have associated the dish with the South by 1917, when Edna Ferber's Fanny Herself mentioned a Chicago restaurant falsely advertising "Southern chicken dinner with waffles and real maple syrup, 35 cents each."[12]
For what it's worth, I ****ing love chicken and waffles. The real outrage should come from schools serving up those shitty breaded fish sticks.
 
Amark serves up shit food like this. Now imagine an option of fruit choices. And one of the choices was watermelon. (I've had shit frozen melon as a kid and it sucks)

While also realizing that chicken and waffles had already been planned for the day before at some point being revised. So there was a mix up and the shitty chicken and waffles returned along with the planned non-descript "fruit" offering clearly marked for each school lunch day on the Feb calendar.

It's easy to see how this could be a non planned event.

 
This episode of “As The Snowflake’s Turn” is brought to you by the Woke Corp makers of imaginary outcry.
Nothing more snowflakey than the bogeymanning of CRT and turning it into a damn oh no we’re telling white boys that they’re evil oh noes oh noes and drafting state legislation and making it basically a part of a party platform good god you fücking imbecile have a modicum of awareness you precipitously dumb fück.
 
Nothing more snowflakey than the bogeymanning of CRT and turning it into a damn oh no we’re telling white boys that they’re evil oh noes oh noes and drafting state legislation and making it basically a part of a party platform good god you fücking imbecile have a modicum of awareness you precipitously dumb fück.
CRT is a joke on education.
 
Are these photos of school lunches in Iowa?
No idea where. I was just curious how many hits I'd get on reddit looking for school lunches featuring it. That and I wanted to point out how hilariously shitty and soulless what I found was. (processed chicken and a frozen waffle)
 
No idea where. I was just curious how many hits I'd get on reddit looking for school lunches featuring it. That and I wanted to point how hilariously shitty and soulless what I found was. (processed chicken and a frozen waffle)
Sure. Edit: And Twitter photos aren't a good source of evidence. Do better.
 
Don’t be a doofus.
Intent aside, if you think this was just a coincidence then there’s nothing you won’t believe.
I never said I was convinced it was a coincidence. Rather... I did say that those that are seemingly convinced (or close to) that it was not a coincidence or gaff are wrong thinking. That's my beef.

You watched this video, right?
 
Was it ever reported who actually changed the menu? It wasn't the school and wasn't Aramark. So who? Edit: @Colonoscopy 's schtick is playing Devil's Advocate.

It's not Devil's Advocate since I actually believe my position; that this shouldn't be viewed as necessarily a purposeful attempt to cause discord. But yes, I obviously have no problem going against the grain.

The video clearly answers your question. District officials blame changes in Amark leadership for the mixup. (in referencing why the modified menu, which removed Chicken and Waffles from Feb 1, was not followed) Amark only said, from what I recall, that they screwed up. (although it wasn't a purposeful attempt at Black History month meal)

Clear as day in this video.
 
It's not Devil's Advocate since I actually believe my position; that this shouldn't be viewed as necessarily a purposeful attempt to cause discord. But yes, I obviously have no problem going against the grain.

The video clearly answers your question. District officials blame changes in Amark leadership for the mixup. (in referencing why the modified menu, which removed Chicken and Waffles from Feb 1, was not followed) Amark only said, from what I recall, that they screwed up. (although it wasn't a purposeful attempt at Black History month meal)

Clear as day in this video.
Haha. Whatever. You have made it too obvious.
 
It never ceases to amaze me how hard some folks will twist their logic to try and provide cover/plausible deniability to bad actors. Sad, really.

Was this incident super egregious or horrible? Nope. Should it have even amounted to a news story? Meh, maybe not. But to try and pretend like it was a "coincidence" just makes you look dumb.

Someone decided to be a snarky a-hole and got called out. Not sure why we can't all just admit that and move on.
Oh good grief. Look, there is only a giant bias towards finding the "bad actor" guilty in situations where a topic lots of people are passionate about is concerned. Cops, racism, murder, pedophiles -- nobody likes it or them and it's easy to believe the worst.

This means it's easy for lots of people to read more into situations than what they ought to given the available evidence and knowledge of circumstances at hand. We clearly have an over-abundance of this sort of thinking, and an under-abundance of circumspect thinking when it comes to these sorts of topics.

Your position is nothing to be proud of.

Your problem is you assume a bad actor way too quickly. I enjoy calling you out on it. That's what's going on.
 
Oh good grief. Look, there is only a giant bias towards finding the "bad actor" guilty in situations where a topic lots of people are passionate about is concerned. Cops, racism, murder, pedophiles -- nobody likes it or them and it's easy to believe the worst.

This means it's easy for lots of people to read more into situations than what they ought to given the available evidence and knowledge of circumstances at hand. We clearly have an over-abundance of this sort of thinking, and an under-abundance of circumspect thinking when it comes to these sorts of topics.

Your position is nothing to be proud of.

Your problem is you assume a bad actor way too quickly. I enjoy calling you out on it. That's what's going on.
You are boring. And wrong. It’s called Occam’s Razor. Look it up.
 
You are boring. And wrong. It’s called Occam’s Razor. Look it up.
Dang, Torb. You awakened a dormant part of my brain.

giphy.gif
 
You are boring. And wrong. It’s called Occam’s Razor. Look it up.
This guy saves me from getting too wordy here... there's a reason I don't invoke occam's razor too often...

Occam’s razor is a conservative mental model, which may prevent you from exploring complex but interesting solutions. While theorists may thrive for mathematical beauty, it makes no sense to go for the most elegant solution when trying to figure out a real-life problem.

The biggest mistake people make with this mental model is to assume it reasonable to transpose a philosophico-scientific principle to messy day-to-day challenges. It may also be used as a way to gloss over complex but crucial components in an argument, thus falling prey to confirmation bias—our natural tendency to interpret information in a way that affirms our prior hypotheses.

Occam’s razor may be useful in very specific scientific settings. For example, doctors use a version of it—“when you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras”—to ensure they go for the simplest diagnosis to explain their patient’s symptoms. And even this approach has been criticised by researchers.

But for most of us, there are stronger, more applicable alternative strategies. They do require more work, but as we said: the world is not simple.

 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT