I am in 100% agreement that there should be strict civil liability to any firearm owners for any injuries their firearm causes by anyone; even criminal liability should be on the table but that might be tougher sell for someone who had their firearm stolen or taken without their permission to carry out a crime.
Big picture, the other issue is the needle in a haystack analogy. There are 330 million people in the usa and maybe 100-200 of those 330,000,000 people will carry out a mass shooting tradegy at a school or church or mall or wal mart style in their lifetime. The cold truth is it is still extremely unlikely someone will perish in one of these events; from the linked article:
The lifetime risk of dying in a mass shooting is around 1 in 110,154 — about the same chance of dying from a dog attack or legal execution.
This doesn’t mean that I am pro this or that. What can be done that would identify the proverbial needle in a haystack person from carrying out their wishes, firearm or driving a vehicle into a crowd which is becoming a popular way to commit a mass killing?
Perspective is important because throwing an overwhelming amount of money and political capital in attempt to stop mass shootings from happening may not really have any effect at all.
In my opinion, the best way to approach this issue is local: parents, students, teachers, counselors and others have to take a larger role in mitigating the mass shooting risk.
We're committed to being your source for expert health guidance. Come to us in your pursuit of wellness.
www.healthline.com