according to this article, about 25X more people were expelled with title 42 (the covid restrictions) than remain in mexico
www.newsnationnow.com
I wasn't referring to Trump’s pointless wall. Asylum seekers are walking up to our ports looking for agents to give themselves up to for catch and release. THAT'S the problem.
newrepublic.com
democrats wanted foreign aid, republicans wanted border security
Can I ask you two things again. Do we not already have laws on the books that handle immigration? Second, why do you think Biden used an executive order to remove "Remain in Mexico"?
His other great move at the time was to remove the Houthi's from the terrorist list.You mean a solution like the one he used the minute he took office? You know, the executive orders to open up the border? That kind of solution? I mean, the man who used executive orders to open up the border could NEVER easily issue another one to quickly close it. Good Lord.
I know what you’re getting at, and I agree, but in a sense she is right. There should be no reason why Congress can’t work together to pass a common sense bill for border security.
They can't govern nor do they want to. They love chaos, just like Trump.
Can we just "pass it so we can see what's in it?" Is that still a good idea?
There is a reason. They don't want to.
Nah bro, enjoying the laugh at the mental pretzels the dwms will put themselves in.
You know I wish I could agree but we are so far past common sense I don't think any of those politicians get to speak of having it.
That is true and Johnson should have brought the bill to the house floor for debate. Make changes and vote.
I am sorry, but I agree with others on here. The fact remains that if he had NOT done his executive action and waited for a bill that he and his people claimed they have always wanted, then we would not be here and having this debate. There simply is no debating that.according to this article, about 25X more people were expelled with title 42 (the covid restrictions) than remain in mexico
about 1.8 million vs 70K
Remain in Mexico vs. Title 42: Which does what?
The Supreme Court ruled the Biden administration can terminate the Trump-era Remain in Mexico program, but a different border policy enacted during the previous administration, Title 42, is still i…
Right.
That’s why I said I agree with what you’re getting at. Biden should do the right thing, but he won’t.
Ugh...you are just wrong. Biden didn't wait until the end of the pandemic to end Trumps policies with his executive order.
I wasn't referring to Trump’s pointless wall. Asylum seekers are walking up to our ports looking for agents to give themselves up to for catch and release. THAT'S the problem.
So you are COMPLETELY IGNORANT. We do not have laws adequate to limit asylum seekers, which are the entire problem right now. That's what the bill addresses, for the first time: a hard limit on asylum seekers according to what we can detain and process, along with first-time authority for total border closures:
Republican Senator Loses His Mind Over What His Party Is Doing on Border Deal
Senator James Lankford doesn’t understand why the rest of his party is killing the chance to do something on immigration.
"The key aspect of this, again, is, are we as Republicans going to have press conferences and complain the border is bad and then intentionally leave it open?” Lankford said on Fox News.
“Are we going to just complain about things, or are we actually going to address and change as many things as we can?”
Lankford has been steadily losing his mind over Republicans’ response to the bipartisan bill. In late January, he said on Fox News that he was just trying to give his party what they have been demanding: a more restrictive border policy.
“Now, it’s interesting, a few months later, when we’re finally getting to the end, they’re like, ‘Just kidding, I actually don’t want a change in law because it’s a presidential election year,’” he said.
I hate to put this back on you again......but there was absolutly NO PROBLEM with Asylum seekers until Biden came in...and you know it. Our laws were working just fine before Biden came in, used his executive orders and told migrants to COME ON UP! So no, I cannot call you COMPLETELY IGNORANT, you are simply lying. And, speaking of interesting....isn't it interesting that right after he opens the borders.....Biden and the Dems can't seem to push any bill on reform (crappy as it is), until 4 years later in an election time. It almost like he is grifting votes, just like he is is doing with his illegal transfer of student debt to the rest of us.I wasn't referring to Trump’s pointless wall. Asylum seekers are walking up to our ports looking for agents to give themselves up to for catch and release. THAT'S the problem.
So you are COMPLETELY IGNORANT. We do not have laws adequate to limit asylum seekers, which are the entire problem right now. That's what the bill addresses, for the first time: a hard limit on asylum seekers according to what we can detain and process, along with first-time authority for total border closures:
Republican Senator Loses His Mind Over What His Party Is Doing on Border Deal
Senator James Lankford doesn’t understand why the rest of his party is killing the chance to do something on immigration.
"The key aspect of this, again, is, are we as Republicans going to have press conferences and complain the border is bad and then intentionally leave it open?” Lankford said on Fox News.
“Are we going to just complain about things, or are we actually going to address and change as many things as we can?”
Lankford has been steadily losing his mind over Republicans’ response to the bipartisan bill. In late January, he said on Fox News that he was just trying to give his party what they have been demanding: a more restrictive border policy.
“Now, it’s interesting, a few months later, when we’re finally getting to the end, they’re like, ‘Just kidding, I actually don’t want a change in law because it’s a presidential election year,’” he said.
and this is why it's hard to actually have this conversation
