the people who can not understand doing the right thing, honoring your word, what does that say about your character.nobody here is saying they were legally bound to grant the release, only that they should have.
What's right? Anything of any major importance to me has always been put into writing to avoid these types of conflicts. So, it's hard for me to believe that so many people were "trusting" and didn't care to protect themselves by obtaining a written document.
btw - i wouldn't even consider for a second giving David McFadden a release if i'm VT
Then we are all happy you aren't a coach or an AD. Also shows your ethics and how you opperate on flo.btw - i wouldn't even consider for a second giving David McFadden a release if i'm VT
http://pilotonline.com/sports/brand...cle_94fb7504-43e5-52dd-9c0b-4c948c45fb9a.html
Brands' departure leaves Va. Tech wrestling with a tough decision
- The Virginian-Pilot
- Apr 7, 2006
Last week Virginia Tech was optimistic about its wrestling program.
With former Olympic gold medalist Tom Brands at the helm, the Hokies were, according to athletic director Jim Weaver, "on the verge of doing some outstanding things."
Those hopes all but disintegrated Wednesday, as Brands was introduced as the new coach at Iowa, his alma mater, and the Hokies announced plans to evaluate whether the program is worth continuing.
...
NCAA rules allow student-athletes except football, basketball and hockey players to transfer one time from one four-year college to another without having to sit out a year, provided their original school grants them a release. Jaudon said he could not recall an instance in his seven-year tenure when Tech had denied such a request.
is there something a/immoral about committing to, and signing on a dotted line to an institution and then reneging on that?
serious question. is it wrong for an institution to want to retain the assets they have?
Couldn't admit the truth before he died,
No but not if you had an understanding. Should have ISU just taken a year away from David Taylor? Why didn't Taylor and Cael get a signed agreement prior? Oh because it just happened suddenly. I don't blame either for going to PSU.
VT reneged period but in the ADs slightest defense he really didn't think it was going to happen in one year. But the Ohio state job opening up changed the landscape. Tom had no idea Zalesky was going to be canned a year later other wise he wouldn't even have left. All parties did not know otherwise why would Borschal and Slaton just went to Iowa for the get go. They even said that they wanted to be Hawks but individually thought in order to be champs they needed Brands. They were already best buddies with M* heading to Iowa City. They went to Blacksburg based on verbal reassurance if something would happen.
I realize that's not normal, but an AD goes out of his way when he is trying to build a program out of nothing. Im sure Weaver was bitter that he made a handshake on something he didn't think would come to fruition let alone within a year.
Willie I get your said and don't disagree. I also don't like the whole grad transfer thing in football or basketball now. But the VT thing doesn't really apply best for your side. Why don't you bring up Taylor and ISU releasing him to follow Cael. IMO that's more of an example of what you want to talk about.
That makes it pretty clear to me. Thanks for posting.
Tom Brands put those kids in the situation. Tom did what was best for Tom, not the kids. Tom Brands screwed those kids out of a year, not VT. BTW, they signed to attend the University. Read the contract.
Did you get your domestic partner to sign a letter saying he'd be faithful and not cheat on you? Or do you have one of them there open relationships?What's right? Anything of any major importance to me has always been put into writing to avoid these types of conflicts. So, it's hard for me to believe that so many people were "trusting" and didn't care to protect themselves by obtaining a written document.
This. Read the book title "Four Days to Glory" on Borschel and Leclere's senior season and why they went to VT. They were recruited by Iowa but felt Zalesky was a bit cold on his visits and seemed disinterested in the whole recruiting thing while Tom really got to them. It talks about how they had always dreamed of being Hawkeyes but that they didn't have that much confidence in Zalesky. Great read for any wrestling fan btw.
i'm trying to be clear but don't know that i can say it any more plainly - with an agreement in place - the Metcalf, Borchel et al - should have gotten their releases imo.
i don't blame Tom or the athletes for being p!ssed off under the circumstances. (i didn't know the details which the posters above have now proven).
but i still maintain (my opinion) that an athlete who is 'in the system' (on campus, taking classes, training) shouldn't just be given a release. they made a commitment. and the university provided them services and scholarship.
I 100% believe that any athlete that signs an LOI as a SR and then has second thoughts should be given their release, especially in the case of coaching changes - ex. David Taylor, Austin Gomez, Jake Allar
i can't recall the timeline of Matt Brown's training and mormon mission. did he ever train and take classes at ISU? if so, i wouldn't have given him a release.
Cyler is an odd situation in that he's related to the coach. if he was not Cael's brother, there's no way in hell i'd give a SR AA a release.
So...............does anyone have any questions?![]()
So you're saying Iowa messed up when they gave Mocco a release?
i'm saying i wouldn't have granted it
Yeah. Didn't Brands sign a contract with VTech? When he reneged on that contract the University did not owe him the full rewards of said contract. Similarly when athletes renege on a signed LOI the University does not owe them full rewards. Whatever happened to commitment?
That's why we can all hope you never end up working with or in charge of young people.i'm saying i wouldn't have granted it
Interesting read, Looks like he inherited a pretty decent team with the success he had in his first season. In the Article it says some of the inherited wrestlers quit the team and the Redshirts led to his rough second season. Anyone know why they quit after a successful 1st season, or did they mean they quit when he got there and he had success in his first season anyway?http://pilotonline.com/sports/brand...cle_94fb7504-43e5-52dd-9c0b-4c948c45fb9a.html
Brands' departure leaves Va. Tech wrestling with a tough decision
- The Virginian-Pilot
- Apr 7, 2006
Last week Virginia Tech was optimistic about its wrestling program.
With former Olympic gold medalist Tom Brands at the helm, the Hokies were, according to athletic director Jim Weaver, "on the verge of doing some outstanding things."
Those hopes all but disintegrated Wednesday, as Brands was introduced as the new coach at Iowa, his alma mater, and the Hokies announced plans to evaluate whether the program is worth continuing.
...
NCAA rules allow student-athletes except football, basketball and hockey players to transfer one time from one four-year college to another without having to sit out a year, provided their original school grants them a release. Jaudon said he could not recall an instance in his seven-year tenure when Tech had denied such a request.
The differece here is that I am willing to admit my bias in that I don't like you and I don't like flo and the reasons why. You simply spout contradictions and when shown you are wrong state you were unaware of those facts. However, then still go back to the same conclusions. The definition of a biased conclusion is one reached when the facts show otherwise. Sure you will be able to rationalize this as well.i'm trying to be clear but don't know that i can say it any more plainly - with an agreement in place - the Metcalf, Borchel et al - should have gotten their releases imo.
i don't blame Tom or the athletes for being p!ssed off under the circumstances. (i didn't know the details which the posters above have now proven).
but i still maintain (my opinion) that an athlete who is 'in the system' (on campus, taking classes, training) shouldn't just be given a release. they made a commitment. and the university provided them services and scholarship.
I 100% believe that any athlete that signs an LOI as a SR and then has second thoughts should be given their release, especially in the case of coaching changes - ex. David Taylor, Austin Gomez, Jake Allar
i can't recall the timeline of Matt Brown's training and mormon mission. did he ever train and take classes at ISU? if so, i wouldn't have given him a release.
Cyler is an odd situation in that he's related to the coach. if he was not Cael's brother, there's no way in hell i'd give a SR AA a release.
The differece here is that I am willing to admit my bias in that I don't like you and I don't like flo and the reasons why. You simply spout contradictions and when shown you are wrong state you were unaware of those facts. However, then still go back to the same conclusions. The definition of a biased conclusion is one reached when the facts show otherwise. Sure you will be able to rationalize this as well.
The differece here is that I am willing to admit my bias in that I don't like you and I don't like flo and the reasons why. You simply spout contradictions and when shown you are wrong state you were unaware of those facts. However, then still go back to the same conclusions. The definition of a biased conclusion is one reached when the facts show otherwise. Sure you will be able to rationalize this as well.
it's already here man:i'd hate to see the landscape of college athletics become one that every/any disgruntled athlete can move on to another program without restrictions or ramifications.
sure. bb.
i'm just giving my opinion. i'd hate to see the landscape of college athletics become one that every/any disgruntled athlete can move on to another program without restrictions or ramifications.
just my $.02
Tom Brands put those kids in the situation. Tom did what was best for Tom, not the kids. Tom Brands screwed those kids out of a year, not VT. BTW, they signed to attend the University. Read the contract.
Maybe its just me that has a problem with media today. That it's not necessary to know the facts before they release an editorial or voice an opinion. Is it just being lazy and not wanting to bother or is it that it might negatively effect their opinion or is it just a bias that can't be changed? At any rate hurting or questionng other peoples integrity without doing the research is wrong. But then one can always rationalize itin the form of a debate??
i'm certainly aware that my position of not granting releases (not including the VT thing, which i said above, i wasn't clear of the details on) isn't one that people agree with. but that's the way i see it. and no, i don't take that position to 'shock jock'; i legitimately believe that stance is the right one.
anyway - i appreciate the (mostly) healthy discussion. thanks fellas.
oh - and another example. if i were ISU and Parker, Storr, and Colbray wanted to transfer right now i wouldn't grant them a release either.
LOL, why do you ask ? Are you still interested in him? I thought he quit you!Did you get your domestic partner to sign a letter saying he'd be faithful and not cheat on you? Or do you have one of them there open relationships?