First, didn't ask you. But since you volunteered - do you not think the things Scott Adams said are racist? Is that why you don't think his comic strip should be removed?No and no.
First, didn't ask you. But since you volunteered - do you not think the things Scott Adams said are racist? Is that why you don't think his comic strip should be removed?No and no.
So Scott can be blatantly racist to 1950s levels but shouldn't lose business because if it?No and no.
First, didn't ask you. But since you volunteered - do you not think the things Scott Adams said are racist? Is that why you don't think his comic strip should be removed?
Why not?I think the things he said are whack-a-doodle crap but that shouldn't cause his strip to be cancelled.
I mean the car killed a bunch of people bit we shouldn't remove it from the market...I think the things he said are whack-a-doodle crap but that shouldn't cause his strip to be cancelled.
So Scott can be blatantly racist to 1950s levels but shouldn't lose business because if it?
Why not?
Why?I think the things he said are whack-a-doodle crap but that shouldn't cause his strip to be cancelled.
Because what he says in real life doesn't have anything to do with the art he creates.
Hell, look at all the outrageous lefty artists with all their causes and protestations.
Who gets to decide what the sacred cows are?
KKK style racism is not a sacred cow worth protecting.How about the Doonesbury guy? His strips are nothing but leftist attacks against the right and it's frankly not even funny.
I think the things he said are whack-a-doodle crap but that shouldn't cause his strip to be cancelled.
Are you serious?
So you don't see what he said as anything but conservative viewpoints?Because what he says in real life doesn't have anything to do with the art he creates.
Hell, look at all the outrageous lefty artists with all their causes and protestations.
Who gets to decide what the sacred cows are?
You ever had to fire a nurse for non-nurse stuff?
So you don't see what he said as anything but conservative viewpoints?
Do you think racism should be condemned?
Did he harass someone who works for newspaper that canceled his strip?
Would you fire one of your nurses for saying blatantly racist things to patients, co-workers or families?Did he harass someone who works for newspaper that canceled his strip?
You dodged the question HR guy
Yeah you see what he said as simply a conservative viewpoint? Really?Yeah, and that has to work both ways.
Would you fire one of your nurses for saying blatantly racist things to patients, co-workers or families?
Yeah you see what he said as simply a conservative viewpoint? Really?
We certainly wouldn't fire someone for off the clock commentary that doesn't have anything to do with behavior while at work.
You agree that what Scott says was batshit wrongYeah, but that's not what happened here.
No, I see it as crazy ramblings.
But if we're going to institute a "speech police" then all sorts of bad things will come from that.
You wouldn't fire one of your nurses for posting blatantly racist comments on Facebook?Yeah, but that's not what happened here.
Commentary
You agree that what Scott says was batshit wrong
You agree that people can be fired for off work activities.
Yet you can't agree that Scott's employers should have the right to fire him for blatant racism.
Square this for me
Bullshit you wouldn't.We certainly wouldn't fire someone for off the clock commentary that doesn't have anything to do with behavior while at work.
So you don't think blatantly racist speech should be condemned or have any consequences. That figures.No, I see it as crazy ramblings.
But if we're going to institute a "speech police" then all sorts of bad things will come from that.
So anyone can say anything they want, at any time, in any place without any repercussions?What other sacred cows shall not be discussed, regardless of the setting, at the risk of being fired?
Where does that end?
It ends when a business decides it doesn't want to be associated with a racist.What other sacred cows shall not be discussed, regardless of the setting, at the risk of being fired?
Where does that end?
So you don't think blatantly racist speech should be condemned or have any consequences. That figures.
Be careful what you wish for....
Ummm...the people who fvcking pay for it,Who gets to decide what the sacred cows are?
Ummm...the people who fvcking pay for it,
This wasn't political speech. It could be considered discrimination and harassment which are absolutely covered under employment laws even outside the workplace.I mostly agree with Trad here. People shouldn't, in general, be fired for divisive political opinion made away from their place of work. If word gets out and the commentary is so divisive that it hinders productivity at work, I could see making a move.
But no, generally, I wouldn't fire anybody for the mere existence of X commentary. Be it in support of ISIS or saying something that could be construed as racist.
The real world should be more like this message board, where you're able to make any range of dumb political commentary, but aren't driven out of society so long as maintain yourself as a law abiding citizen and can perform your job according to its demands.
Should you be able to sell your music on Spotify even if you hate jews? Yeah, sure. I just don't see the problem.
Spotify can do what they want -- but what they should do is play it the way I say.
This wasn't political speech. It could be considered discrimination and harassment which are absolutely covered under employer laws even outside the workplace.