True.Tamping down the crazy would be a lot easier with an actual party platform though right? When your number one quality to be considered a good conservative is how much you can pwn the libs you’re kind of inviting the crazy.
True.Tamping down the crazy would be a lot easier with an actual party platform though right? When your number one quality to be considered a good conservative is how much you can pwn the libs you’re kind of inviting the crazy.
What’s funny, @binsfeldcyhawk2 ?? Counter his point with facts. Thanks. You probably don’t think DeSantis created the Florida map either.A conservative judge rewrote the map in 5 districts, giving cons 5 seats.
that seems to be a tactic used by both partiesFearmongering, it's all they have.
Deep breaths Tom.What’s funny, @binsfeldcyhawk2 ?? Counter his point with facts. Thanks. You probably don’t think DeSantis created the Florida map either.
Those maps had been in place for years, NYC, (3) Buffalo (1) and 1 in SW NY.Judge tossed the D gerrymandering attempt
Read my linked article…their new map got tossed. It’s in the first sentence 😂Those maps had been in place for years, NYC, (3) Buffalo (1) and 1in SW NY.
Rs have severe structural problems. They've primaried nearly all of their good candidates. What's left are nutbags so it'll take years to purge all of the extremists. Honestly, I don't think the GOP has enough serious members to craft real policy even if they wanted to.Inflation and the border and their voters will still believe them.
If it were only about policy, it'd be simple. It's far beyond that now and you should be smart enough to know what the fringe topics are.Again, could someone please explain to me what extreme policies democrats have? I need to know what policy thoughts I need to let go to move more to the middle. Unbelievable.
Please explain.If it were only about policy, it'd be simple. It's far beyond that now and you should be smart enough to know what the fringe topics are.
This is not intended to be confrontational, and readily admit my perceptions of democrat polices could be wrong. With that said, ending filibuster, adding states (DC, PR, etc), no restrictions on abortions, Universal Based Income, and "No More Drilling" seem to be extreme to me.Again, could someone please explain to me what extreme policies democrats have? I need to know what policy thoughts I need to let go to move more to the middle. Unbelievable.
The only filibuster change that could theoretically happen is the talking filibuster which both sides agree with.This is not intended to be confrontational, and readily admit my perceptions of democrat polices could be wrong. With that said, ending filibuster, adding states (DC, PR, etc), no restrictions on abortions, Universal Based Income, and "No More Drilling" seem to be extreme to me.
This sounds like the PAC for ihhawk.
Buy your tickets NOW! THE BIG RED TSUNAMI is first come. first served....seating is limited!What issue will re-energize the Rs to regroup after their loss? I'm racking my brain for anything good. Inflation didn't work. Crime didn't work. CRT, trans kids, radical leftists, Nancy Pelosi. They all failed. So what will the Rs rally behind?
I'm still trying to understand why people want all those things to continue. 🤷♂️What issue will re-energize the Rs to regroup after their loss? I'm racking my brain for anything good. Inflation didn't work. Crime didn't work. CRT, trans kids, radical leftists, Nancy Pelosi. They all failed. So what will the Rs rally behind?
The only filibuster change that could theoretically happen is the talking filibuster which both sides agree with.
I've seen no real talk about adding states.
I've seen no Dems pushing for no restrictions on abortion.
I've seen no talks on universal income.
And drilling is still legal. There is no push to end drilling.
Policy is straight forward. Economy, environment, foreign affairs, defense spending, etc. Fringe topics like election denial, "late term abortion," position on Jan 6, impeaching Biden, and so on, are the type of topics that piss off moderate voters who don't give 2 shits about those things.Please explain.
maybe because most folks understand they are transitional issues at best? Maybe folks are understanding that other than tax cuts for the wealthy, the modern day GOP has NO suggestions or solutions for "problems" America suffers?I'm still trying to understand why people want all those things to continue. 🤷♂️
Great to hear! So, is it fair to say that you would vote against any democrat who supports ending filibuster, adding states, no restrictions on abortion, endorsed universal based income, and supported an end to drilling?
One more extreme position I have heard is that democrats want to add SCOTUS seats. Would you vote against any democrat who supports adding SCOTUS positions?
Deep breaths Tom.
The D gerrymandering attempt in New York got tossed.
![]()
In setback for Democrats, New York judge throws out new congressional map
A New York state judge on Thursday threw out the state's new Democratic-backed congressional map as unconstitutional and ordered lawmakers to redraw the lines, a decision that could significantly hurt the party's chances of retaining control of the U.S. Congress in November's elections.www.reuters.com
None of those are on the ballot.Great to hear! So, is it fair to say that you would vote against any democrat who supports ending filibuster, adding states, no restrictions on abortion, endorsed universal based income, and supported an end to drilling?
One more extreme position I have heard is that democrats want to add SCOTUS seats. Would you vote against any democrat who supports adding SCOTUS positions?
We'll see. And, hopefully, House Republicans won't waste time, money and energy on a witch hunt. It would be nice if the country could move forward without extremism.None of those are on the ballot.
Wake me when your bad dream ends, Are We.......talking about it and having it happen are two different things! Remember how you and yours were gonna replace ACA?Great to hear! So, is it fair to say that you would vote against any democrat who supports ending filibuster, adding states, no restrictions on abortion, endorsed universal based income, and supported an end to drilling?
One more extreme position I have heard is that democrats want to add SCOTUS seats. Would you vote against any democrat who supports adding SCOTUS positions?
At this point I just want two functioning parties. Because right now all we have is one. I desperately want the GOP to grow up. Unfortunately for them they will likely need to purge 90% of their ranks to even start, though. So it'll be a while.We'll see. And, hopefully, House Republicans won't waste time, money and energy on a witch hunt. It would be nice if the country could move forward without extremism.
NY had R gerrymandering? How so? D’s control the state legislature…lopsidedly
Hochul only beat Zeldin by 5 pts…that explains the R’s picking up seats there..not gerrymandering
Cuomo won by 25 pts in 2018 for reference
How so? Democrats don't try to take individual rights and freedoms away from anybody. Women and the LGBTQ community would compare to what exactly from Democrats? An example would be cool.that seems to be a tactic used by both parties
Did they lose the house? I must have been sleeping when they called it.What issue will re-energize the Rs to regroup after their loss? I'm racking my brain for anything good. Inflation didn't work. Crime didn't work. CRT, trans kids, radical leftists, Nancy Pelosi. They all failed. So what will the Rs rally behind?
I don’t see where Tom responded to this. Did he implode?Deep breaths Tom.
The D gerrymandering attempt in New York got tossed.
![]()
In setback for Democrats, New York judge throws out new congressional map
A New York state judge on Thursday threw out the state's new Democratic-backed congressional map as unconstitutional and ordered lawmakers to redraw the lines, a decision that could significantly hurt the party's chances of retaining control of the U.S. Congress in November's elections.www.reuters.com
I was responding to a post talking about R's engaging in fear mongering. If you don't think D's did the same thing on the campaign trail, then you are in denial.How so? Democrats don't try to take individual rights and freedoms away from anybody. Women and the LGBTQ community would compare to what exactly from Democrats? An example would be cool.
Guns aren't individuals, btw, and the arguement there assumes Democrats want to take away all guns, which they don't.
Democrats want Christianity to mind it's own business and respect our the secularism defined in our constitution. Damned busybodies.
If D's don't resort to extreme policies, then those bad dreams will end.Wake me when your bad dream ends, Are We.......talking about it and having it happen are two different things! Remember how you and yours were gonna replace ACA?
We all want two functioning parties. If the D's end filibuster, add states, end drilling, pass a law allowing abortions without restrictions, implement UBI and add SCOTUS seats, then it will mean they are not a functioning party. All of this would be extreme.At this point I just want two functioning parties. Because right now all we have is one. I desperately want the GOP to grow up. Unfortunately for them they will likely need to purge 90% of their ranks to even start, though. So it'll be a while.
Examples please.I was responding to a post talking about R's engaging in fear mongering. If you don't think D's did the same thing on the campaign trail, then you are in denial.
I'm guessing with the way the youth vote went against the Rs that they will try to raise the voting age to 21 again.What issue will re-energize the Rs to regroup after their loss? I'm racking my brain for anything good. Inflation didn't work. Crime didn't work. CRT, trans kids, radical leftists, Nancy Pelosi. They all failed. So what will the Rs rally behind?
But first, the MAGAts have to get Hunter Biden! (the root of all evil!)I'm guessing with the way the youth vote went against the Rs that they will try to raise the voting age to 21 again.
They may have already lost the younger generation.
taking away ssi, ending gay marriage, ending interracial marriage, taking away reproductive rightsExamples please
I consider this extreme, but it is ok for us to disagree.None of those are on the ballot.
That said, I personally want DC and PR added, I want universal income paid for by severe taxation on rich people. I want more judges. I want universal healthcare.
But none of those things will happen with the Dems, because the Dems are actually centrists. People like me don't vote D because we believe we'll get our way. We vote D because the Rs are complete nutbags.
Plenty of ads about republicans wanting to take away your social securityExamples please.
Not you.....but Trump, McConnell, and every damn GOP candidate campaigning for Congress in 2016....I read quickly...didn't know this was "all about you" ....sorry.If D's don't resort to extreme policies, then those bad dreams will end.
Link to me wanting to replace ACA?
A conservative judge rewrote the maps in 5 districts, giving cons 5 seats. One Lawler, the cons have been out parading around.