I don't think he cares. His job is to win national championships and recruiting over kids is part of the deal.
Just quoting this for future reference. It should be noted that most of your fellow board members vehemently disagree.
I don't think he cares. His job is to win national championships and recruiting over kids is part of the deal.
It should be noted that most of your fellow board members vehemently disagree.
I don't think that is accurate at all. They just think loyalty, to a certain degree, should be expected. If you have guys like Schriever and Murin, who haven't AA'd yet, you bring in a Eierman, Teske or even a Woods and let the chips fall. However when you have a proven guy, that is different. Like, for instance, Michael Beard. If they had someone like him, I don't think they would have chased Dean.(They actually did in Warner). Now, if Dean came knocking and was willing to come for next to nothing, that is different. No team turns that down.Just quoting this for future reference. It should be noted that most of your fellow board members vehemently disagree.
psu didn't actively pursue dean either. that has been well established. and warner was way more established than michael beard. remember, he was very up and down and already on his 3rd year out of high school. he was a surprise AA who was the beneficiary of a blown up bracket. his path to AA was 18 seed (w), 31 seed (w-schultz pinned himself r1), 26 seed (L), 13 seed (W).I don't think that is accurate at all. They just think loyalty, to a certain degree, should be expected. If you have guys like Schriever and Murin, who haven't AA'd yet, you bring in a Eierman, Teske or even a Woods and let the chips fall. However when you have a proven guy, that is different. Like, for instance, Michael Beard. If they had someone like him, I don't think they would have chased Dean.(They actually did in Warner). Now, if Dean came knocking and was willing to come for next to nothing, that is different. No team turns that down.
But, they weren't going to actively pursue Dean. That is the difference. Another good example goes back to the very beginning of Brands HC stint at Iowa. Alex Tsirtsis dediced he wanted to redshirt. As such, that changed the money he had to offer Jordan Blanton. Instead of telling Tsirtsis no or changing his funding, they ended up losing Blanton. Things like that don't go unnoticed.
If you want to put together a list of rules we can govern our collective thought by, Im happy to read the f** from afar.....this is such a silly conversation. when you have the ability to improve the team, you do it.
Strengthens 133 and gives the weight AA depth. Whomever wins 133 and nails down the job will be better now because of it. Brands knows this.
Has 2 years left, presumably both at 133.
Be pretty cool next year to Ayala / Teske at the first two weights. Not counting out Schriver but he has never been the same since he was injured in high school (junior year I believe).
You actively do it when you have unproven guys. You don't go recruit Feldman when you have Cass(who has "only" finished 3rd and 7th). But, I did say you take Dean if he is the one knocking and willing to come for cheap. That is my sole point.psu didn't actively pursue dean either. that has been well established. and warner was way more established than michael beard. remember, he was very up and down and already on his 3rd year out of high school. he was a surprise AA who was the beneficiary of a blown up bracket. his path to AA was 18 seed (w), 31 seed (w-schultz pinned himself r1), 26 seed (L), 13 seed (W).
this is such a silly conversation. when you have the ability to improve the team, you do it.
He was healthier back then, maybe. Better health.How does a weight without an AA competing have “AA depth”?
He had multiple wins over NCAA qualifiers last season but he was better as a HS junior? Highly doubtful.
i know you know this msu,the sour grapes come from the pst boys every time iowa picks up a transfer. they got their feelings hurt sometime in the past and can't let it go.I don't think that is accurate at all. They just think loyalty, to a certain degree, should be expected. If you have guys like Schriever and Murin, who haven't AA'd yet, you bring in a Eierman, Teske or even a Woods and let the chips fall. However when you have a proven guy, that is different. Like, for instance, Michael Beard. If they had someone like him, I don't think they would have chased Dean.(They actually did in Warner). Now, if Dean came knocking and was willing to come for next to nothing, that is different. No team turns that down.
But, they weren't going to actively pursue Dean. That is the difference. Another good example goes back to the very beginning of Brands HC stint at Iowa. Alex Tsirtsis dediced he wanted to redshirt. As such, that changed the money he had to offer Jordan Blanton. Instead of telling Tsirtsis no or changing his funding, they ended up losing Blanton. Things like that don't go unnoticed.
Yeah…. I taste sour grapes every time PSU wins a national title. So I guess we’re all even….i know you know this msu,the sour grapes come from the pst boys every time iowa picks up a transfer. they got their feelings hurt sometime in the past and can't let it go.
i know you know this msu,the sour grapes come from the pst boys every time iowa picks up a transfer. they got their feelings hurt sometime in the past and can't let it go.
Yup, that’s literally what happened with him and Penn State.You actively do it when you have unproven guys. You don't go recruit Feldman when you have Cass(who has "only" finished 3rd and 7th). But, I did say you take Dean if he is the one knocking and willing to come for cheap. That is my sole point.
If by most you mean 5-10 then you’re correct but hell don’t let facts get in the way of your feelings.Just quoting this for future reference. It should be noted that most of your fellow board members vehemently disagree.
I'm sure none of that exists on the PSU board, right? Always consistent objective thought over there.Ha, no we just revel in the oblivious hypocritical lunacy. The lack of insight is its own meme by now.
I'm sure none of that exists on the PSU board, right? Always consistent objective thought over there.
Once again you reach for controversy rather than read the quote. Typical. Didn't say he was better as a high school junior but the injury he sustained hampered his progress. You must just sit and police the board for ANY opportunity to chime in with your rhetoric dude. SadHow does a weight without an AA competing have “AA depth”?
He had multiple wins over NCAA qualifiers last season but he was better as a HS junior? Highly doubtful.
i am sure it does trap, but i would not know i have no reason to go to their board.If the guys that come here are representative of their posters, no thanks.I'm sure none of that exists on the PSU board, right? Always consistent objective thought over there.
He’s like a shark following the scent of stupidity around the ‘pool. Sometimes he just bites down just to chomp on something.Once again you reach for controversy rather than read the quote. Typical. Didn't say he was better as a high school junior but the injury he sustained hampered his progress. You must just sit and police the board for ANY opportunity to chime in with your rhetoric dude. Sad
There goes the neighborhood. Property values are sinking around here.i am sure it does trap, but i would not know i have no reason to go to their board.If the guys that come here are representative of their posters, no thanks.
Once again you reach for controversy rather than read the quote. Typical. Didn't say he was better as a high school junior but the injury he sustained hampered his progress. You must just sit and police the board for ANY opportunity to chime in with your rhetoric dude. Sad
Get lost punk...no one here wants your stupid input...We hide it much better.
😉
And very ironic.That was pretty cool. Welcome aboard, and good luck kid.
Well it's a great song, and maybe he just likes Skynyrd.And very ironic.
Simple Man for a kid who's set to attend his third college in 4 years.
Go Hawks.
Well, hopefully we’re going to “lock him up,” for a couple of years in IC.And very ironic.
Simple Man for a kid who's set to attend his third college in 4 years.
Go Hawks.
Funny to see the PSU dorks run over here to point out that Brands recruited over our backup last year.
They seem to think it is.Well it’s not recruiting over if the guy coming in doesn’t get the spot. Unless he has health issues, I have Schriever. If Teske takes it, I’ll support him too.
See what now?Funny to see the PSU dorks run over here to point out that Brands recruited over our backup last year.
Well it’s not recruiting over if the guy coming in doesn’t get the spot. Unless he has health issues, I have Schriever. If Teske takes it, I’ll support him too.
There is a difference between accepting it and hating it. I am pretty sure, deep down, they all accepted it. Just the pure hate caused them to find any argument, rational or irrational, to put up against it!It would probably help if our dorks hadn't been so critical of PSU accepting an NCAA runner up to replace their 7th placer. Talk about an absolute no-brainer, yet our fans couldn't contain their butthurt.
Not if Schreiver is healthy and has anything to say about it, imo.Any chance of him going back down after Spencer and Ayala is aloud to eat/lift and goes 133?
Pumped to see Spencer really putting the work in the weight room. I’d say all the time off with the knees has helped that. He looks like a freaking animal ready for this year.
Yeah we all know your position on this. You’ve repeated it many times. You are the biggest butthurt dork on this site.It would probably help if our dorks hadn't been so critical of PSU accepting an NCAA runner up to replace their 7th placer. Talk about an absolute no-brainer, yet our fans couldn't contain their butthurt.