Texas Stripped of Powers in Border Security Bill

[NorthernHawkeye]

The bill would strip the power of Texas and other states to challenge some of the its provisions in their local federal court.

...

Bill Shipley, who was a federal prosecutor for over 20 years, decried the its court provisions on X, formerly Twitter, on Sunday.

"This would prevent plaintiffs - like the State of Texas - from filing suit in Texas federal courts. This is corrupt," he wrote.

...

After outlining the provisions under which immigrants can seek judicial review of a deportation order, the bill states:

"The United States District Court for the District of Columbia shall have sole and original jurisdiction to hear challenges, whether constitutional or otherwise, to the validity of this section or any written policy directive, written policy guideline, written procedure, or the implementation thereof."

Texas stripped of powers in border security bill

New border security bill says constitutional challenges can only be made in Washington D.C.

www.newsweek.com

 

[THE_DEVIL]

As it should be.

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

As it should be.

Why?

 

[Here_4_a_Day]

The bill would strip the power of Texas and other states to challenge some of the its provisions in their local federal court.

...

Bill Shipley, who was a federal prosecutor for over 20 years, decried the its court provisions on X, formerly Twitter, on Sunday.

"This would prevent plaintiffs - like the State of Texas - from filing suit in Texas federal courts. This is corrupt," he wrote.

...

After outlining the provisions under which immigrants can seek judicial review of a deportation order, the bill states:

"The United States District Court for the District of Columbia shall have sole and original jurisdiction to hear challenges, whether constitutional or otherwise, to the validity of this section or any written policy directive, written policy guideline, written procedure, or the implementation thereof."

Texas stripped of powers in border security bill

New border security bill says constitutional challenges can only be made in Washington D.C.

www.newsweek.com

Sick, marxist freaks.........

 

[Jimmy McGill]

They are not a sovereign nation

 

[St. Louis Hawk]

This must be the week that cons are against jurisdiction stripping.

 

[THE_DEVIL]

Why?

It is the U.S. Border

 

[Jimmy McGill]

Not rocket science

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

It is the U.S. Border

So all those federal district court rulings across the country that the left cheered on during the Trump presidency shouldn't have happened?

 

[binsfeldcyhawk2]

So all those federal district court rulings across the country that the left cheered on during the Trump presidency shouldn't have happened?

That’s different

 

[THE_DEVIL]

So all those federal district court rulings across the country that the left cheered on during the Trump presidency shouldn't have happened?

That’s different

Such as?

 

[93hawkeye]

States have a duty to protect their citizens' rights. When, not if, the Federal Government is the offender, the state should have the means of legal redress, yada, yada, yada.

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

Such as?

Federal judges in Hawaii and Maryland ruling on the travel ban.

 

[Hawk_82]

As it should be.

The federal government was created by the states and it exists to serve the states. This has been forgotten lately.

If the government tries to take the rights from the states, especially when it is pointed at a specific political side will lead to war against the federal government.

 

[SocraticIshmael]

The federal government was created by the states and it exists to serve the states. This has been forgotten lately.

If the government tries to take the rights from the states, especially when it is pointed at a specific political side will lead to war against the federal government.

🤣

War?! I truly hope they try that!

 

[THE_DEVIL]

The federal government was created by the states and it exists to serve the states. This has been forgotten lately.

If the government tries to take the rights from the states, especially when it is pointed at a specific political side will lead to war against the federal government.

So there is no such thing as the U.S. Border?

 

[THE_DEVIL]

States have a duty to protect their citizens' rights. When, not if, the Federal Government is the offender, the state should have the means of legal redress, yada, yada, yada.

Texas still does.

 

[Scruddy]

"Whether constitutional or otherwise"

Uhhh.. excuse me?

 

[NoWokeBloke]

Anybody who cheers that on is an America hating POS.

 

[WadeLookingbill]

Anybody who cheers that on is an America hating POS.

Welcome new poster, we're so interested how you found your way to this little corner of the internet?! We hope you enjoy your brief stay until 11/5/24.

 

[alaskanseminole]

They are not a sovereign nation

 

[THE_DEVIL]

Federal judges in Hawaii and Maryland ruling on the travel ban.

Northern, I'm not trying to play dumb but its been a long day and my brains is mush right now. Could you dumb it down for me on how this relates to the issue at hand?

 

[thewop]

So sanctuary cities should also be banned then right?

 

[joelbc1]

Anybody who cheers that on is an America hating POS.

Do you usually make dumb-phuque statements upon entering the room?
Keeping your mouth shut, people always wonder….saying dumb-shit stuff removes all doubt.

 

[alaskanseminole]

I didn't read the OP. Can we have landmines at the border or not?

 

[sober_teacher]

So all those federal district court rulings across the country that the left cheered on during the Trump presidency shouldn't have happened?

That’s different

Correct. They did not involve states attempting to usurp the authority of the federal government.

 

[joelbc1]

I didn't read the OP. Can we have landmines at the border or not?

If put there by the Feds, maybe…but it’s gotta be a helluva lot different circumstances than exist now.

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

Northern, I'm not trying to play dumb but its been a long day and my brains is mush right now. Could you dumb it down for me on how this relates to the issue at hand?

The American left utilized federal courts in Hawaii and Maryland in an attempt to stop Trump's travel ban. The left cheered this action on.

 

[joelbc1]

The American left utilized federal courts in Hawaii and Maryland in an attempt to stop Trump's travel ban. The left cheered this action on.

Both, the “American left” is a bunch of crafty bastards aren’t they?

 

[jamesvanderwulf]

All Texas really has to do is built a wall/fence a half mile inside the border with Mexico, so all they are doing is protecting Texas form super south Texas. Problem solved...

 

[THE_DEVIL]

All Texas really has to do is built a wall/fence a half mile inside the border with Mexico, so all they are doing is protecting Texas form super south Texas. Problem solved...

Winner. Thread/

 

[fredjr82]

@kwik44 this should probably be locked? It breaks rule #2. @NorthernHawkeye has already posted this multiple times here:

This thread

I guess we'll see if you eat your own dog food as they say.

 

[tarheelbybirth]

The federal government was created by the states and it exists to serve the states. This has been forgotten lately.

If the government tries to take the rights from the states, especially when it is pointed at a specific political side will lead to war against the federal government.

Immigation is codified by law as a federal issue. Specifically. You really can't have individual states making their own immigration rules, you know.

 

[tarheelbybirth]

Correct. They did not involve states attempting to usurp the authority of the federal government.

I swear, self-styled conservatives are becoming the dumbest segment of the population. Buckley wept.

 

[SA_Hawk]

Time to restart the flights to Martha’s Vineyard.

 

[Flie]

This must be the week that cons are against jurisdiction stripping.

That's different.

 

[Tom Paris]

The bill would strip the power of Texas and other states to challenge some of the its provisions in their local federal court.

...

Bill Shipley, who was a federal prosecutor for over 20 years, decried the its court provisions on X, formerly Twitter, on Sunday.

"This would prevent plaintiffs - like the State of Texas - from filing suit in Texas federal courts. This is corrupt," he wrote.

...

After outlining the provisions under which immigrants can seek judicial review of a deportation order, the bill states:

"The United States District Court for the District of Columbia shall have sole and original jurisdiction to hear challenges, whether constitutional or otherwise, to the validity of this section or any written policy directive, written policy guideline, written procedure, or the implementation thereof."

Texas stripped of powers in border security bill

New border security bill says constitutional challenges can only be made in Washington D.C.

www.newsweek.com

Good. Until Governor Abbott learns to treat brown people like the human beings they are, he shouldn't have any say with what is done with them.

 

[Here_4_a_Day]

Good. Until Governor Abbott learns to treat brown people like the human beings they are, he shouldn't have any say with what is done with them.

How is someone this ill allowed around children? I just don't get it!

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

Time to restart the flights to Martha’s Vineyard.

The Biden Administration needs to cease the disastrous parole policy and start enforcing current law related to deportations and workplace enforcement.

 

[joelbc1]

The Biden Administration needs to cease the disastrous parole policy and start enforcing current law related to deportations and workplace enforcement.

They are acting according to the law. They are applying the correct law. Not the Trump/MAGAt/FOX law…..