ADVERTISEMENT

The Abortion Ban Backlash Is Starting to Freak Out Republicans

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
78,736
61,094
113
By Michelle Goldberg
Opinion Columnist
Sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter Get expert analysis of the news and a guide to the big ideas shaping the world every weekday morning. Get it sent to your inbox.
After the Republican Party’s disappointing performance in the 2022 midterms, fueled in large part by a backlash to the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade, the Republican National Committee recommitted itself to anti-abortion maximalism.
A resolution adopted at the R.N.C.’s winter meeting in January urges Republican lawmakers “to pass the strongest pro-life legislation possible.” Addressing their party’s poor showing in November, it said that Republicans hadn’t been aggressive enough in defending anti-abortion values, urging them to “go on offense in the 2024 election cycle.”
The 11-point loss of the Republican-aligned candidate in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court election on Tuesday has influential conservatives rethinking this strategy. “Republicans had better get their abortion position straight, and more in line with where voters are, or they will face another disappointment in 2024,” said a Wall Street Journal editorial.
Ann Coulter tweeted, “The demand for anti-abortion legislation just cost Republicans another crucial race,” and added, “Please stop pushing strict limits on abortion, or there will be no Republicans left.” Jon Schweppe, policy director of the socially conservative American Principles Project, lamented, “We are getting killed by indie voters who think we support full bans with no exceptions.”
Story continues below advertisement
Continue reading the main story


But having made the criminalization of abortion a central axis of their political project for decades, Republicans have no obvious way out of their electoral predicament. A decisive majority of Americans — 64 percent, according to a recent Public Religion Research Institute survey — believe that abortion should be legal in most cases. A decisive majority of Republicans — 63 percent, according to the same survey — believe that it should not. When abortion bans were merely theoretical, anti-abortion passion was often a boon to Republicans, powering the grass-roots organizing of the religious right. Now that the end of Roe has awakened a previously complacent pro-choice majority, anti-abortion passion has become a liability, but the Republican Party can’t jettison it without tearing itself apart.
The reason voters think Republicans support full abortion bans, as Schweppe wrote, is that many of them do.
In the last Congress, 167 House Republicans co-sponsored the Life at Conception Act, conferring full personhood rights on fertilized eggs. In state after state, lawmakers are doing just what the R.N.C. suggested and using every means at their disposal to force people to continue unwanted or unviable pregnancies. Idaho, where almost all abortions are illegal, just passed an “abortion trafficking” law that would make helping a minor leave the state to get an abortion without parental consent punishable by five years in prison. The Texas Senate just passed a bill that, among other things, is intended to force prosecutors in left-leaning cities to pursue abortion law violations. South Carolina Republicans have proposed a law defining abortion as murder, making it punishable by the death penalty.
In Florida, which already has a 15-week abortion ban, Gov. Ron DeSantis is expected to soon sign a law banning almost all abortions at six weeks. This isn’t something Florida voters want — polls show a majority of them support abortion rights — but it’s a virtual prerequisite for his likely presidential campaign.
Republican attempts to moderate abortion prohibitions even slightly have, for the most part, gone nowhere. Last year, the Idaho’s Republican Party defeated an amendment to the party’s platform allowing for an exception to the state’s abortion ban to save a woman’s life. In the weeks before the Wisconsin election on Tuesday, Republican lawmakers introduced a bill providing some narrow exceptions to the state’s abortion prohibition for cases of rape, incest and grave threats to a pregnant person’s health, but they lacked the votes in their own party to pass it.
Story continues below advertisement
Continue reading the main story


It’s true that this week Tennessee’s Legislature passed a bill permitting abortion to save a patient’s life or prevent “serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function.” But the legislation is meaningless to the point of perversity, since it places the burden of proof on doctors rather than on the state, so that they must still fear prosecution for treating pregnant people in severe medical distress. Language that would allow women to end “medically futile pregnancies” was stripped out.


“My fellow pro-lifers and I will also need to make the case to expectant mothers, and fathers too, that their unborn children are, like the rest of us, dependent and needy persons.”
Erika Bachiochi, a conservative legal scholar, in “What Makes a Fetus a Person?” Read the guest essay.
“The overturning of Roe v. Wade reveals the Supreme Court’s neglectful reading of the amendments that abolished slavery and guaranteed all people equal protection under the law. It means the erasure of Black women from the Constitution.”
Michele Goodwin, a professor of law at the University of California, in “No, Justice Alito, Reproductive





It’s not surprising that voters have reacted with revulsion to being stripped of rights they’d long taken for granted, and to seeing the health of pregnant women treated so cavalierly. But the backlash seems to have caught Republicans off guard. Last May, when the Supreme Court’s draft decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization leaked, Coulter assured her readers that the end of Roe wouldn’t help Democrats. “Outside of the media, no one seems especially bothered by the decision,” she wrote.
Part of what happened here is that conservatives fell for their own propaganda about representing “normal” Americans. (This, incidentally, is the same reason many on the right can’t admit to themselves that Donald Trump lost in 2020.) Coulter was sure Americans would be turned off by those outraged by the end of Roe, writing, “Everybody hates the feminists.” When a poll last year showed that 55 percent of Americans identified as pro-choice, a piece in National Review told readers not to worry: “Many of our policy goals enjoy strong public support.”
Untethered to actual Republican voters, Coulter was able to pivot, but the Republican Party cannot. Instead, its leaders are adopting a self-soothing tactic sometimes seen on the left, insisting they’re being defeated because they’ve failed to make their values clear, not because their values are unpopular. “When you’re losing by 10 points, there is a messaging issue,” the Republican Party chairwoman, Ronna McDaniel, said on Fox News, explaining the loss in Wisconsin.
But you can’t message away forced birth. Republicans’ political problem is twofold. Their supporters take the party’s position on abortion seriously, and now, post-Roe, so does everyone else.

 
Wait a second. I thought that Rs were trying to protect kids by banning abortions. So why are they willing to let all that protection go simply because they are losing elections? Don't they care about the lives they're saving?
 
Ann Coulter tweeted, “The demand for anti-abortion legislation just cost Republicans another crucial race,” and added, “Please stop pushing strict limits on abortion, or there will be no Republicans left.” Jon Schweppe, policy director of the socially conservative American Principles Project, lamented, “We are getting killed by indie voters who think we support full bans with no exceptions.”
Story continues below advertisement
Holy shit, if Coulter is smart enough to understand it, how ****ing stupid are the people pushing this shit?
 
Kim Strassel’s piece in today’s WSJ
echoes this sentiment and it’s one I completely agree with.
Republicans (mostly male legislators) have cowed and caved too long to the surprisingly small but very active and vociferous ultra religious minority of anti-choice fanatics.
The Democrats will continue to campaign on this issue as long as it’s a winning tactic and as long as educated suburban women of all political persuasions continue to vote in bigger numbers than men.
I’m not a “pro-abortion” person. But I am definitely a “pro-choice mind my own business” person. Polls consistently show I have a lot of company.
 
Holy shit, if Coulter is smart enough to understand it, how ****ing stupid are the people pushing this shit?
willy-wonka-gene-wilder.gif


It truly is the most valuable political gift that the Dem party has ever received. And yes, the GOP nationwide has been demonstrating regularly their complete lack of understanding of where these types of actions will lead them to. They can't read a crowd if their life depended on it.
 
Kim Strassel’s piece in today’s WSJ
echoes this sentiment and it’s one I completely agree with.
Republicans (mostly male legislators) have cowed and caved too long to the surprisingly small but very active and vociferous ultra religious minority of anti-choice fanatics.
The Democrats will continue to campaign on this issue as long as it’s a winning tactic and as long as educated suburban women of all political persuasions continue to vote in bigger numbers than men.
I’m not a “pro-abortion” person. But I am definitely a “pro-choice mind my own business” person. Polls consistently show I have a lot of company.
The left has never been "pro-abortion" but they've been and remain "pro-choice."
 
"But you can’t message away forced birth. Republicans’ political problem is twofold. Their supporters take the party’s position on abortion seriously, and now, post-Roe, so does everyone else".

Yeah, the repubs have public sentiment against them. They will continue to lose elections. Too bad.
 
"But you can’t message away forced birth. Republicans’ political problem is twofold. Their supporters take the party’s position on abortion seriously, and now, post-Roe, so does everyone else".

Yeah, the repubs have public sentiment against them. They will continue to lose elections. Too bad.
Sad to say, not in Iowa.
 
These dumb MFers just don’t get it. Treating women as second-class citizens and taking away their bodily autonomy is a losing proposition.

All from a single, federal judge in Texas that was shopped for this very purpose.

 
Their problem is that their base loves them pushing that shit, and will desert consider them to be RINOs if they stop.

That's it. Almost all of these state legislators live in districts that love this shit. It only hurts statewide elections; not states or the House. Governors and Senators in purple states are nervous, but they have lost control of the party.
 
willy-wonka-gene-wilder.gif


It truly is the most valuable political gift that the Dem party has ever received. And yes, the GOP nationwide has been demonstrating regularly their complete lack of understanding of where these types of actions will lead them to. They can't read a crowd if their life depended on it.
Lol that protecting child’s life should be a political calculation.
 
Kim Strassel’s piece in today’s WSJ
echoes this sentiment and it’s one I completely agree with.
Republicans (mostly male legislators) have cowed and caved too long to the surprisingly small but very active and vociferous ultra religious minority of anti-choice fanatics.
The Democrats will continue to campaign on this issue as long as it’s a winning tactic and as long as educated suburban women of all political persuasions continue to vote in bigger numbers than men.
I’m not a “pro-abortion” person. But I am definitely a “pro-choice mind my own business” person. Polls consistently show I have a lot of company.
It's a damn shame that fighting for the right to end innocent human life is a "winning tactic". My prayer is that some day humans will figure it out.
 
By Michelle Goldberg
Opinion Columnist
Sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter Get expert analysis of the news and a guide to the big ideas shaping the world every weekday morning. Get it sent to your inbox.
After the Republican Party’s disappointing performance in the 2022 midterms, fueled in large part by a backlash to the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade, the Republican National Committee recommitted itself to anti-abortion maximalism.
A resolution adopted at the R.N.C.’s winter meeting in January urges Republican lawmakers “to pass the strongest pro-life legislation possible.” Addressing their party’s poor showing in November, it said that Republicans hadn’t been aggressive enough in defending anti-abortion values, urging them to “go on offense in the 2024 election cycle.”
The 11-point loss of the Republican-aligned candidate in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court election on Tuesday has influential conservatives rethinking this strategy. “Republicans had better get their abortion position straight, and more in line with where voters are, or they will face another disappointment in 2024,” said a Wall Street Journal editorial.
Ann Coulter tweeted, “The demand for anti-abortion legislation just cost Republicans another crucial race,” and added, “Please stop pushing strict limits on abortion, or there will be no Republicans left.” Jon Schweppe, policy director of the socially conservative American Principles Project, lamented, “We are getting killed by indie voters who think we support full bans with no exceptions.”
Story continues below advertisement
Continue reading the main story


But having made the criminalization of abortion a central axis of their political project for decades, Republicans have no obvious way out of their electoral predicament. A decisive majority of Americans — 64 percent, according to a recent Public Religion Research Institute survey — believe that abortion should be legal in most cases. A decisive majority of Republicans — 63 percent, according to the same survey — believe that it should not. When abortion bans were merely theoretical, anti-abortion passion was often a boon to Republicans, powering the grass-roots organizing of the religious right. Now that the end of Roe has awakened a previously complacent pro-choice majority, anti-abortion passion has become a liability, but the Republican Party can’t jettison it without tearing itself apart.
The reason voters think Republicans support full abortion bans, as Schweppe wrote, is that many of them do.
In the last Congress, 167 House Republicans co-sponsored the Life at Conception Act, conferring full personhood rights on fertilized eggs. In state after state, lawmakers are doing just what the R.N.C. suggested and using every means at their disposal to force people to continue unwanted or unviable pregnancies. Idaho, where almost all abortions are illegal, just passed an “abortion trafficking” law that would make helping a minor leave the state to get an abortion without parental consent punishable by five years in prison. The Texas Senate just passed a bill that, among other things, is intended to force prosecutors in left-leaning cities to pursue abortion law violations. South Carolina Republicans have proposed a law defining abortion as murder, making it punishable by the death penalty.
In Florida, which already has a 15-week abortion ban, Gov. Ron DeSantis is expected to soon sign a law banning almost all abortions at six weeks. This isn’t something Florida voters want — polls show a majority of them support abortion rights — but it’s a virtual prerequisite for his likely presidential campaign.
Republican attempts to moderate abortion prohibitions even slightly have, for the most part, gone nowhere. Last year, the Idaho’s Republican Party defeated an amendment to the party’s platform allowing for an exception to the state’s abortion ban to save a woman’s life. In the weeks before the Wisconsin election on Tuesday, Republican lawmakers introduced a bill providing some narrow exceptions to the state’s abortion prohibition for cases of rape, incest and grave threats to a pregnant person’s health, but they lacked the votes in their own party to pass it.
Story continues below advertisement
Continue reading the main story


It’s true that this week Tennessee’s Legislature passed a bill permitting abortion to save a patient’s life or prevent “serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function.” But the legislation is meaningless to the point of perversity, since it places the burden of proof on doctors rather than on the state, so that they must still fear prosecution for treating pregnant people in severe medical distress. Language that would allow women to end “medically futile pregnancies” was stripped out.


“My fellow pro-lifers and I will also need to make the case to expectant mothers, and fathers too, that their unborn children are, like the rest of us, dependent and needy persons.”
Erika Bachiochi, a conservative legal scholar, in “What Makes a Fetus a Person?” Read the guest essay.
“The overturning of Roe v. Wade reveals the Supreme Court’s neglectful reading of the amendments that abolished slavery and guaranteed all people equal protection under the law. It means the erasure of Black women from the Constitution.”
Michele Goodwin, a professor of law at the University of California, in “No, Justice Alito, Reproductive





It’s not surprising that voters have reacted with revulsion to being stripped of rights they’d long taken for granted, and to seeing the health of pregnant women treated so cavalierly. But the backlash seems to have caught Republicans off guard. Last May, when the Supreme Court’s draft decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization leaked, Coulter assured her readers that the end of Roe wouldn’t help Democrats. “Outside of the media, no one seems especially bothered by the decision,” she wrote.
Part of what happened here is that conservatives fell for their own propaganda about representing “normal” Americans. (This, incidentally, is the same reason many on the right can’t admit to themselves that Donald Trump lost in 2020.) Coulter was sure Americans would be turned off by those outraged by the end of Roe, writing, “Everybody hates the feminists.” When a poll last year showed that 55 percent of Americans identified as pro-choice, a piece in National Review told readers not to worry: “Many of our policy goals enjoy strong public support.”
Untethered to actual Republican voters, Coulter was able to pivot, but the Republican Party cannot. Instead, its leaders are adopting a self-soothing tactic sometimes seen on the left, insisting they’re being defeated because they’ve failed to make their values clear, not because their values are unpopular. “When you’re losing by 10 points, there is a messaging issue,” the Republican Party chairwoman, Ronna McDaniel, said on Fox News, explaining the loss in Wisconsin.
But you can’t message away forced birth. Republicans’ political problem is twofold. Their supporters take the party’s position on abortion seriously, and now, post-Roe, so does everyone else.

Dang skrait.
 
This...it was pretty safe politically to be anti-abortion when they had Roe to hide behind. Now that it's gone it's a major issue. When Roe was the law it was on the periphery.

They could still have simply allowed states to decide here. That is not what they have done. Kansas voters voted 60% to maintain abortion rights, and their legislature is trying to override the will of their constituents.

Now, Idaho is trying to prevent people from traveling out of state and this judge is banning basic abortion meds across the entire country.

That's completely inconsistent with their original "state's rights" claims. And it's likely they will pay for it, as more and more women having miscarriages who NEED abortions to prevent serious health problems (which include both dying in pregnancy or leaving them unable to conceive another child). GOP is fine with throwing the baby out with the bathwater here, simply to ban a minority of "elective abortions" they don't like, and force women to take on very serious health risks for abortions that are medically necessary.

Once the women in their communities start having these serious health issues and die due to difficult pregnancies, there is going to be backlash. Major employers who have women that are out of work for a couple months waiting to fully miscarry, until they get sick enough to "qualify" for an abortion, are not going to like this, either. They'd prefer their female employees who miscarry, be able to get immediate care and get back to their regular jobs, rather than be lying in a hospital bleeding out and waiting for "their life to be at risk" to get medical care.
 
Last edited:
It's a damn shame that fighting for the right to end innocent human life is a "winning tactic".
You're brainwashed here.

LOTS of these abortions are medically necessary, due to complications. Now, some states will prevent women from traveling out of state to get them, and are going to require them to wait until they have serious health issues to get the abortions.

This is the exact opposite of "standard of care" in treating the conditions before they can cause serious harm to someone.

We get it: you don't like elective abortions. So, push for widespread PSAs for using birth control, so they don't happen in the first place. Why won't the GOP do that?
 
I am an anti-choice atheist.

So tired of people tying anti-choice to religion.

It IS "tied to religion", because the religious whackos won't allow messaging and outreach for basic birth control. People "having sex" for enjoyment goes against their religious sensibilities, so they cannot advocate for birth control to prevent pregnancies in the first place.

Non-religious people would not take this stance - they'd be in favor of education and messaging to prevent pregnancy in the first place. But that ain't who's running the anti-abortion show here, is it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ree4 and Tom Paris
It IS "tied to religion", because the religious whackos won't allow messaging and outreach for basic birth control. People "having sex" for enjoyment goes against their religious sensibilities, so they cannot advocate for birth control to prevent pregnancies in the first place.

Non-religious people would not take this stance - they'd be in favor of education and messaging to prevent pregnancy in the first place. But that ain't who's running the anti-abortion show here, is it?

Let’s be honest: there is a large segment of the “pro life” community that simply want to slut shame. They want to punish a woman for having sex and getting pregnant - with no repercussions for the male partner who was involved.

This isn’t about “protecting the unborn”. This is punitive…and they want to shame and degrade. And - again - with no responsibility or consequences for a male. It’s about control of women…it’s as simple as that.

It’s akin to what we saw in Tennessee this week. There was a central theme from the TNGOP that smacked of: “how dare you….you uppity negro…”. Go back and review the tapes. This is very similar to: “How dare you….you loose and immoral woman!”

These are the same people who decided that AIDS was a god’s punishment for same sex relations.
 
Wait a second. I thought that Rs were trying to protect kids by banning abortions. So why are they willing to let all that protection go simply because they are losing elections? Don't they care about the lives they're saving?
The backtracking will be delicious.

“When I said that life begins at conception and that ALL abortion, regardless of circumstance, is cold blooded murder, what I actually meant was…”
 
Let’s be honest: there is a large segment of the “pro life” community that simply want to slut shame. They want to punish a woman for having sex and getting pregnant - with no repercussions for the male partner who was involved.
Yep

God is punishing those evil sluts by forcing them to miscarry, and their un-Godly sex acts are what caused a problem pregnancy.
 
Eventually, even in Iowa, things are going to change. Optimism will eventually win out over doom and gloom.

'Everything sucks' is a terrible platform.


Iowa is too far gone. The national Democratic Party has abandoned Iowa as well. It's so small it's not worth any expense
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom Paris
Yep

God is punishing those evil sluts by forcing them to miscarry, and their un-Godly sex acts are what caused a problem pregnancy.

Christian fascists don’t want to recognize actual free will - and the human condition. Individuals are born gay. Individuals are born with gender confusion. Individuals have sexual desires and act upon them.

Christian fascists see a world that was “promised” to them from a highly-edited novel from 2,000 years ago. They believe they were created in the image of a god…then pick fights about what that image actual is, when people don’t align to their’s.

Then we have a legislative and judicial system that is stacked to force morality - based on what their definition of morality is. There is no recognition of Old Testament morality (Judaism) - or, frankly, really adhering to the New Testament view of morality (“love thy neighbor…”). This doesn’t even account for all the other varied views of morality that exist.

America is being governed by fear - and fear yearns for control. It’s unreal where we are as a nation.
 
Last edited:
Iowa is too far gone. The national Democratic Party has abandoned Iowa as well. It's so small it's not worth any expense

Give it time my friend. Eventually better leaders will emerge and we'll pull this state out of the ditch. I'm too much of an optimist to believe otherwise. I'm bullish on both Iowa and America. It's what keeps me going.
 
Give it time my friend. Eventually better leaders will emerge and we'll pull this state out of the ditch. I'm too much of an optimist to believe otherwise. I'm bullish on both Iowa and America. It's what keeps me going.

Good Luck. I am not going to wait around and see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blhawk
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT