Too bad that's a local commercial. Those of us outside the footprint don't know who you're talking about. (hint)
Yep, I'm on board.We're not asking for Aaron Rodgers here...all we want is a QB that will hit a receiver who is wide open by 5 yards on a 30 yard throw...is that really too much to ask? We left points on the field there because McNamara can't make simple throws that D1 QB's HAVE to make. Hit the wide open guy when it happens because it doesn't happen 10 times a game. He just can't take advantage of it when it happens (like the TE down the seam in the ISU game)
And wrs that can get open.must be nice to have a capable quarterback
I think we do but he doesn't play muchmust be nice to have a capable quarterback
That was the dude that made their TD grab. I doubt he wants any part of blocking.Entringer pancaked the WR
chuck and bump those receivers, PhilP doesnt do that very muchWide open all day
How's that?Do f***ing better, bend don't break defense........
have to say this is how norm’s defenses used to be. yardage given by the mile but hold in redzone with fans suffering from ulcers.Bend.....DONT BREAK DEFENSE!!!!
Yes, I just posted needing to bump and chuck these receivers so no free running for themThe bump he put on him caused that interception great play
do not disagree but a camera pointing up on each goal post might workTo be fair, there is no camera angle to review when the ball crosses the goal post plane to be able to see if it is inside the goal post. It's not surprising it is unreviewable. KF using a timeout for an unreviewable play---that is also not surprising.
? The refs didn’t even know the rule. Either you challenge our you don’t.You don't reward stupidity
Sullivans highlights against Maryland last year were very impressive.