I have multiple homes.
Come on Jimmy, a 3 month self ban is a fair and realistic bet. Are you scared?
Why are you scared if you own 3 homes (love HBOT millionaires)
I have multiple homes.
Come on Jimmy, a 3 month self ban is a fair and realistic bet. Are you scared?
Quit with your inflation comments. It is absurd. You want inflation ? Lets start putting tariffs on imports, which will....be a tax on the poor.
More Democrats are voting early
Women outnumber men in voting by a substantial margin.
Why are you scared if you own 3 homes (love HBOT millionaires)
Disney/ABC?538 used to do this.
It's been bought out and now is far more skewed than it was originally.
GOP/oligarch interests bought a brand, and are now running it.
Nate Silver's new page shows the same numbers. Harris' lead is down to 1.2% nationally from nearly 4% after the debate.
yeah, shows big numbers for messaging purposes, narrows to come closer to actuals, then proclaims accuracy based on finals. I suspect the new (non Scott Rasmussen owners) are even worse.He thinks it would have magically stopped rising at 4.5%.
And yet, US inflation has been no different that most of Europe.He printed money Joe, just like Biden.
We talking about the bill he signed in 2022? According to your own chart inflation was on its way down then.It's pretty clear. Trump and Republicans wouldn't have put forward a massive climate change bill in the middle of high inflationary times.
To art's point, i don't think the suggestion is that there are more identifiable R ballots being cast than identifiable D ballots (that would be something indeed), it's that the proportion is more R than historically. The website you link to doesn't really provide any historical comparator.» 2024 Early Voting UF Election Lab
election.lab.ufl.edu
To art's point, i don't think the suggestion is that there are more identifiable R ballots being cast than identifiable D ballots (that would be something indeed), it's that the proportion is more R than historically. The website you link to doesn't really provide any historical comparator.
Now of course, none of that tells us anything, since we have precisely zero clue whether early R votes are essentially cannibalizing what might have been later R votes, or whether they are actually incremental. Same for D.
Why would we give Harris a break on the disastrous policies of this administration? I get why the far left wants us to not talk about inflation or the crisis the border car caused, but they're the top 2 issues nationally. Keep running on murdering babies, putting tampons in boys bathrooms and calling your political "enemies" nazis.Quit with your inflation comments. It is absurd. You want inflation ? Lets start putting tariffs on imports, which will....be a tax on the poor.
Do you think every Democrat is voting for the border czar and tampon Tim? Kennedy and tulsi certainly aren't.Do you think every registered R is voting for Trump these days?
Because the majority of his former staffers are not.
Let the record reflect that Jimmy is scared of wagering a 3 month self ban.
You're scared.
absolutely not, and your point is a good one -- there is no more basis for recency bias assumptions with respect to the number of early votes cast than there is for the proportion that will go to each candidate. We have no idea. Though i do think at a macro level, R ballots will 'tend' to go R, and D ballots will 'tend' to go D.Do you think every registered R is voting for Trump these days?
Because the majority of his former staffers are not.
It’s weird how much you seem to like talking about dicks and testicles when your group doesn’t care about gender.You have a tiny dick? Ro ro.
Google ABC ipsos.Show this data.
Because I haven’t seen it.
ipsos indeed shows good numbers for her; interestingly, on silver's house effect ratings, it's at the top of the list in terms of +D (though still a full point or so less than, say, Rasmussen for R's). So yeah. good for her, but caution is in orderGoogle ABC ipsos.
I’m not doing this with you today Joe. I will leave with this parting point of view and let you have the last word (cause otherwise you will take this conversation into tomorrow):And yet, US inflation has been no different that most of Europe.
Which means the impacts you are claiming from "printing money" are not as big as you think they are.
Even as is, the Republicans will do NOTHING that lowers costs. They almost always vote against anything that lowers costs of good and services. It's more lying and blaming things on the Democrats.It'll be a massive tax on the middle class as a whole.
Couple that w/ arresting and deporting the entire workforce that currently performs construction work and farm/crop/meat-packing butchering, and you're looking at a massive jump in food prices. While that will hurt at the grocery store, it will crush restaurants and fast food chains.
Translation: I will ignore the data being presented to me, because it does not support my hypothesis here.I’m not doing this with you today Joe.
My point is simply this:absolutely not, and your point is a good one
You are the one with 3 houses. You don't see me bragging about as much. If your are true MAGA, you would be willing to bet your house.
i wouldn't doubt that at all, but I also wouldn't doubt that whatever that defection rate might be, it might also be offset by increased volume of early R voters, and particularly if the early voters end up being incremental. I don't have a strong feeling whether the defection rate will be 'quite' what you think it will be. On the one hand, I don't think the average Trump voter gives a damn what an 'establishment' R thinks or does. On the other hand, I suspect that 'early' R voters will tend to lean slightly to the establishment types (though I've seen a perfectly decent anecdotal cases that they might not be). And again on the other hand, I think there were a healthy number of R defectors in 2020 as well. So again, really not much to pull strong inferences from, either in absolute or comparative terms.My point is simply this:
There are likely to be more R defections to Harris (as is already well established among several key military leaders and prominent Rs) than there will be D defections to Trump.
He's oddly obsessed. It's in almost every thread now. Gohox is legit coming unraveledIt’s weird how much you seem to like talking about dicks and testicles when your group doesn’t care about gender.
Just another Monday for himYou were offered a realistic wager where everyone on HROT could see the outcome in real time.
You look like a real pussy right now.
538 used to do this.
It's been bought out and now is far more skewed than it was originally.
GOP/oligarch interests bought a brand, and are now running it.
You were offered a realistic wager where everyone on HROT could see the outcome in real time.
You look like a real pussy right now.
I agree with a lot of this, certainly the part on any side claiming there is a landslide coming. As far as early vote, the key to me is just how high the numbers get towards last day to gauge overall turnout, the percentage of women to men (which are last I saw an eye popping near 11 percent more women) and how many non party affiliated / other which are a significant chunk and IMHO going to not break Trumps way.i wouldn't doubt that at all, but I also wouldn't doubt that whatever that defection rate might be, it might also be offset by increased volume of early R voters, and particularly if the early voters end up being incremental. I don't have a strong feeling whether the defection rate will be 'quite' what you think it will be. On the one hand, I don't think the average Trump voter gives a damn what an 'establishment' R thinks or does. On the other hand, I suspect that 'early' R voters will tend to lean slightly to the establishment types (though I've seen a perfectly decent anecdotal cases that they might not be). And again on the other hand, I think there were a healthy number of R defectors in 2020 as well. So again, really not much to pull strong inferences from, either in absolute or comparative terms.
I suppose if you assume comparable noise among pollsters, that's the utility of the polls and polling averages as a whole. As art pointed out earlier, there 'seems' to be a very mild trend (all still very much in the margin of error, with absolutely nothing seeming to be material) toward trump in battlegrounds. But one would have to be insane to call a single state right now based on any of them as a static matter.
People on both sides need to back off of the "big mo" or "sky is falling" messages, because neither is supportable.
BTW Joe, it's nice to have an actual conversation with you.
Do you really think that I care about what you think of me?
Not one bit. Nor should you.
But to be clear, you're the one that started this bet thing. When provided an offer of a realistic wager that everyone on HROT could see, you backed down.
yeah, no doubt that post election, people are going to be studying (or at least trying to study) the cross-tabs on early voting patterns VERY carefully.I agree with a lot of this, certainly the part on any side claiming there is a landslide coming. As far as early vote, the key to me is just how high the numbers get towards last day to gauge overall turnout, the percentage of women to men (which are last I saw an eye popping near 11 percent more women) and how many non party affiliated / other which are a significant chunk and IMHO going to not break Trumps way.
You have multiple homes. You must be doing well. Bet a house.
Indeed. And we are in uncharted waters since in 2020 we had a huge push to vote remote due to Covid and less trust on right about mail in ballots.yeah, no doubt that post election, people are going to be studying (or at least trying to study) the cross-tabs on early voting patterns VERY carefully.
I think it's pretty funny.You look ridiculous here.
Exactly. We are basically in 'year one' of early voting elections.Indeed. And we are in uncharted waters since in 2020 we had a huge push to vote remote due to Covid and less trust on right about mail in ballots.
Someone’s jelly.You have multiple homes. You must be doing well. Bet a house.