If you think he has a point, let's start with who is he talking about?
I don’t know the names real well, but he is talking about Ilham somebody and Rasheed somebody or something like that, isn’t he?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you think he has a point, let's start with who is he talking about?
It’s not correct. Omar, the only foreign born person in this discussion, came when she was 10. Tlaib was born here.
Omar?Nope. I despise racism, white nationalism, and Trump.
But his correct point here is: The reps he is talking about came from places that could benefit from their alleged leadership much more than where they came to (the US). Why did they come here, instead of leading there?
Nope. I despise racism, white nationalism, and Trump.
But his correct point here is: The reps he is talking about came from places that could benefit from their alleged leadership much more than where they came to (the US). Why did they come here, instead of leading there?
I like accents too and find them almost as sexy as evidence from 2003.Probably. Sometime admissions makes errors.
I don’t think that’s necessarily so. Eg, conceivably one could rip a white person similarly.
Eg.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2003-sep-11-me-davis11-story,amp.html
Xenophobic, perhaps.
Why do you think this is a good point? Only one of them came to the US when she was 10 you know. Or did you know? Now that you do know, do you still think you are making a good point?Nope. I despise racism, white nationalism, and Trump.
But his correct point here is: The reps he is talking about came from places that could benefit from their alleged leadership much more than where they came to (the US). Why did they come here, instead of leading there?
I see a silver lining here. Win or lose, Trump has killed the conservative movement.
It’s not correct. Omar, the only foreign born person in this discussion, came when she was 10. Tlaib was born here.
I also find that troubling, much like how I find it troubling that Steve King waves around the confederate flag.Never would have guessed that since Tlaib waives around the Palestinian flag.
I also find that troubling, much like how I find it troubling that Steve King waves around the confederate flag.
LOLz what am i supposed to be condemning?
Troubling. It could be argued that they wave around their respective flags because each feels “their people” are under attack. And that alone doesn’t bother me. So then it becomes “who is their people and are they under attack with some type of reasonable justification?”I also find that troubling, much like how I find it troubling that Steve King waves around the confederate flag.
That's what I thought. So you can stop with your "will the left condemn x" Breitbart posts
Has any other president or even party leader publicly suggested American citizens should leave the country? For any reason? Never mind reason being political?
Also, once again HROT, being critical of Israel is not an act of antisematism.
I don’t recall that either, but we both know he displayed it in his office. So let’s agree that was wrong and stop trying to sidestep the point.Pics of him doing that at a victory party? I’m no King supporter, but don’t recall that.
I would condemn if it’s something, but what part do you want me to condemn?
I find it troubling that any US rep would think their people were represented by either flag.Troubling. It could be argued that they wave around their respective flags because each feels “their people” are under attack. And that alone doesn’t bother me. So then it becomes “who is their people and are they under attack with some type of reasonable justification?”
In the case of Israel/Palestine it is really complicated.
Has any other president or even party leader publicly suggested American citizens should leave the country? For any reason? Never mind reason being political?
Also, once again HROT, being critical of Israel is not an act of antisematism.
Never would have guessed that since Tlaib waives around the Palestinian flag.
I agree that not everyone needs traditional college. But we both know most everyone needs schooling beyond grade 12. That’s all part of the “free college” debate too. Don’t let the details of any plan turn you off from the issue. Support more public access to education and stop pretending it will lead to tyranny and the death of millions.
So not a trade school. A university that is corrupt and innept and yet have no problem telling other families how they should be run?
Funny how that seems to happen a lot.
Are you familiar with the parable about the scorpion and the frogJFC Donald. All you had to do is sit back and watch the democrats go after each other. It was a golden situation for the republicans.
Then you went full moron. Wtf are you thinking. Seriously this has to be the most moronic thing he has done. Inserted himself into the argument to give them something to unify behind.
His entire staff and campaign should quit and everyone should tell him that no one will work for him as long as he has that twitter handle
JFC Donald. All you had to do is sit back and watch the democrats go after each other. It was a golden situation for the republicans.
Then you went full moron. Wtf are you thinking. Seriously this has to be the most moronic thing he has done. Inserted himself into the argument to give them something to unify behind.
His entire staff and campaign should quit and everyone should tell him that no one will work for him as long as he has that twitter handle
I didn’t....but I think we should now call Donald the Scorpion KingAre you familiar with the parable about the scorpion and the frog
Why do you think this is a good point? Only one of them came to the US when she was 10 you know. Or did you know? Now that you do know, do you still think you are making a good point?
It doesn’t gain support. He loses a % of Republicans when he does it. I don’t know that %.But doesn't it also unify Republicans? The question would then be, who benefits more?
I knew Trump was going to be a terrible president. Turns out he was worse than I ever expected.Well, the current agenda seems to be “trump’s an idiot, let’s do socialism.”
I agree with the former and not the latter.
That is not the totality of the proposals. Some have us paying for just community college. Some include vocational training. Some only state universities. If cons agreed that we needed to expand public education, they would have a say in how that legislation looked when it is finally passed. But getting pissed because the most radical proposal exists will just lock you out of the debate just as it has with healthcare.The current proposals are to forgive personal loans in a blanket manner and to just pay for college (whichever). That’s a huge amount of money, and completely federalizes college education, including currently private institutions. Sounds like a step to tyranny and the death of millions.
We have disabused you of the latter so you can rest easy.Well, the current agenda seems to be “trump’s an idiot, let’s do socialism.”
I agree with the former and not the latter.
It doesn’t gain support. He loses a % of Republicans when he does it. I don’t know that %.
Let’s get Biden in with a GOP senate and congress for 1 term
I knew Trump was going to be a terrible president. Turns out he was worse than I ever expected.
I don’t care for most of the Democrats running, but I’ll take ANY of them over Trump.
We have disabused you of the latter so you can rest easy.