ADVERTISEMENT

The Truth About Cancer

Then I guess you know more than Dr. Walter Boortz from Stanford and Dr. Jerome Kassirer. I'll answer that for you. You don't.

Unless they are trying to CAUSE cancer in their patients, I don't think you have a point here...
 
Doctors are not going to recommend cancer-causing information to you over a pen or coffee mug with a pharma drug name on it. ("Here, have this Marlboro cup - now tell your patients they need to smoke 2 packs a day!!":confused:)

You're Gish Galloping into things well beyond what's been posted here, or anything I've stated.
I'll take that as a 'No'. Then you really shouldn't have commented because that book blows up everything you have posted.
 
627b3ad4aa59b1070df7b468b75bd3a5.jpg


I don't wanna be an egg plant with lupus
 
No
It doesn't.
Until you read the book, you have no right to comment on it. Dr. Kassirer, as former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, has forgotten more than you'll ever learn. Dr. Walter Willet, head of Public Policy at Harvard, says 95% of cancer is preventable. Everyone is treating it. Medicine is corrupt. The NIH and the Depts. of Medicine, all do better when Big Pharma is kicking in $200 million to push their agenda.
 
Until you read the book, you have no right to comment on it. Dr. Kassirer, as former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, has forgotten more than you'll ever learn. Dr. Walter Willet, head of Public Policy at Harvard, says 95% of cancer is preventable. Everyone is treating it. Medicine is corrupt. The NIH and the Depts. of Medicine, all do better when Big Pharma is kicking in $200 million to push their agenda.

Dr Willet says all of that?
 

That's a stupid game. Have you read every cancer research paper written in the last 30 years? No? Well then, you are in no position to comment.

If there is an argument germaine to the conversation in the book, present it with the evidence; don't try to argue from "authority." Trying to claim that you've read a book that proves your opinion trumps anybody's argument if they haven't read the book is silly.
 
That's a stupid game. Have you read every cancer research paper written in the last 30 years? No? Well then, you are in no position to comment.

If there is an argument germaine to the conversation in the book, present it with the evidence; don't try to argue from "authority." Trying to claim that you've read a book that proves your opinion trumps anybody's argument if they haven't read the book is silly.
Not a stupid game at all. I never claimed to read research papers. OTOH, JP ripped a book before reading it.
 
Until you read the book, you have no right to comment on it. Dr. Kassirer, as former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, has forgotten more than you'll ever learn. Dr. Walter Willet, head of Public Policy at Harvard, says 95% of cancer is preventable. Everyone is treating it. Medicine is corrupt. The NIH and the Depts. of Medicine, all do better when Big Pharma is kicking in $200 million to push their agenda.

Can you please provide a link where Dr. Willett states that 95% of cancer is preventable? I would like to see the context of that quote. I find that difficult to believe since at an American Association of Cancer Research meeting last year he stated that approximately 30-35% of cancer is attributable to diet, and that his conclusion at the end of his talk is " we still have much to learn".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joes Place
Can you please provide a link where Dr. Willett states that 95% of cancer is preventable? I would like to see the context of that quote. I find that difficult to believe since at an American Association of Cancer Research meeting last year he stated that approximately 30-35% of cancer is attributable to diet, and that his conclusion at the end of his talk is " we still have much to learn".
Here is Dr. Walter Boortz of Stanford quoting Willet:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT