ADVERTISEMENT

This forum will get ugly next year

Franball with a good PG is still Franball.
I expect 18 or so wins next year, no last second miracles to help us forget Iowa really isn't that good.
Assuming everybody comes back except for Nicholas, we would be a Senior laden squad, Senior laden squads generally do pretty well. Iowa will as well. We got to at least 22 this year and I would expect that or more for next year.
 
Awesome, we are putting the outcome of the season on a frosh PG? Joe W. was one of the highest rated players in his class and look at the season he had? You think the head coach plays Joe T. over his own son? That’s entertaining. How many horrible turnovers did Conner have tonight? He’s shooting somewhere around 20% from the field in conference play. He constantly picks up the ball. He honestly shouldn’t be playing and all of a sudden he’s going to give significant minutes to a freshman? Come on...
Yes, if Joe T is as good as he is expected to be Fran will play him with and over his son. He has to. Joe has a skillset we desperately need and do not have.
 
The disagreement I have with your premise is one) this Iowa team is filled with players who have 2-3 seasons of significant game experience and two) these Iowa players have a low ceiling athletically and talent-wise.

Iowa overachieved this year. Will they again next year? I don't know. But I think after nine years it's pretty conclusive this is as good as it will get under Fran. The real question is how you see the Iowa program. Iowa will never have the consistency of a Duke or Michigan State, without question, but if you don't believe it's possible for Iowa to establish a higher bar than where they're at now you are comfortable with Fran. And there's no point in discussing further.

Me, personally, I think Iowa can do a little better. In fact, I know they can. My first taste of Iowa basketball was the early Dr. Tom years. A similar benchmark should be strived for today. Using the tired "Lickliter" excuse is as lame as it is steeped in circular reasoning. Iowa can and should strive for better.

That's a reasoned argument and shows some analysis and thought....not the typical childish, spoiled brat, pouting crap we see from so many on here.....and I sincerely appreciate your approach-thoughts even if we disagree slightly. This makes the type of discussion I hope for on these boards possible...

So, in that spirit this is where my thoughts go that might diverge slightly from yours. I think it also points out (in my mind more accurately) one of Fran's system faults......so one) this Iowa team is filled with players who have 2-3 seasons of significant game experience. I look at the 2-3 years of experience and results as a significant improvement over the 1-2 years experience of last year....an increase of 8 wins at this point. Now hopefully that extrapolates out to another improvement when the majority of the roster is at 3-4 years in the program. I WOULD NOT count on another 8 win improvement...but if they win 3 or 4 more at this stage of the season 25/26 wins then we are looking at very high levels of success, historically, at Iowa.

two) these Iowa players have a low ceiling athletically and talent-wise. We might have a more significant difference of opinion here....my position: we are not a high level team athletically (and I would love more athleticism) but this team is adequate from an athletic standpoint...Joe W, Maishe, Isaiah, and I think Joe T, Patrick, and even Nunge for his size are pretty good athletes...not exceptional, but upper 3rd of the B10. If Cook comes back he is obviously elite level in athleticism....talent I see differently and I understand these terms are somewhat ambiguous. But I think of skill, basketball smarts, and coordination, combined with an adequate level of athleticism equate to talent...and again, this team has enough. To take this a step further, there have been many many teams over the years that have high level success with talent/athleticism similar to this team. I think of a number of Bo Ryan teams and even Loyola of Chicago(?) last year that made the final four?...don't remember exactly but you probably know who I'm talking about.

All that said, do I wish for more athletes and talent....yes-absolutely. Do I want Iowa to be the Duke of the Midwest, yes as much as I hate Duke...do I think we could do better than Fran....certainly that is possible but moving him along with the hope that we do better isn't enough for me to think we should risk another 10-15 years of worse.

Make no mistake, that is not the "but Lick" argument....it's what I see as reality. DON'T change coaches (from someone who is relatively successful and "might" do more still) without a REALLY good shot at getting someone better.....not worth it.

I think we are improved next year....and the upcoming recruiting classes are HUGE for the future of this program. My bet is that we are better staying the course than making a move when a coach has won 22 games this year and won more than 20 for 5 of the last 7?.....If he was going to be fired it should have been after last year.

These people who post here, who claim to be Iowa fans....and immediately shout for firing the coach as soon as we lose a game (and player X sucks because they had an off game) will NEVER be satisfied...ever...Then when some of us support the coach or players after a bad game or bad stretch....we're satisfied? Hardly, we just see a bigger picture.
 
Last edited:
Awesome, we are putting the outcome of the season on a frosh PG? Joe W. was one of the highest rated players in his class and look at the season he had? You think the head coach plays Joe T. over his own son? That’s entertaining. How many horrible turnovers did Conner have tonight? He’s shooting somewhere around 20% from the field in conference play. He constantly picks up the ball. He honestly shouldn’t be playing and all of a sudden he’s going to give significant minutes to a freshman? Come on...

WHY IN THE **** IS EVERYONE SO WORRIED ABOUT OUR 8TH MAN??? ESPECIALLY WHEN NO ONE ELSE CAN DRIBBLE THE BALL?????
 
Until Fran and his useless staff value defense and toughness during February and March Iowa will always be an afterthought.
If Cook returns he should never touch the ball unless on a rebound or on a pass around the basket. If he leaves good luck young man.
This board will always be a train wreck. Hell, even following the game threads on games Iowa was winning, you'd think the other team was butt whipping us.
Fran needs to make changes before next season for sure, whether an assistant retires, someone needs to be brought in to teach defensive. No one currently on this staff has any clue what defense is or how to convey it to the players.
After 9 years of watching Michigan, Michigan St, Purdue, Ohio St., Indiana and Wisconsin always at the top of the BIG by playing defense you'd think Fran would get the idea that defense is part of the game. If nothing changes next year, this board will explode in a thousand pieces.
 
Assuming everybody comes back except for Nicholas, we would be a Senior laden squad, Senior laden squads generally do pretty well. Iowa will as well. We got to at least 22 this year and I would expect that or more for next year.

Because Fran's senior laden squads have all kicked so much ass, right?
I'm not expecting miraculous buzzer beaters next year.
Iowa will be hoping for the bubble yet again down the stretch next year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LaQuintaHawkeye
Until Fran and his useless staff value defense and toughness during February and March Iowa will always be an afterthought.
If Cook returns he should never touch the ball unless on a rebound or on a pass around the basket. If he leaves good luck young man.
This board will always be a train wreck. Hell, even following the game threads on games Iowa was winning, you'd think the other team was butt whipping us.
Fran needs to make changes before next season for sure, whether an assistant retires, someone needs to be brought in to teach defensive. No one currently on this staff has any clue what defense is or how to convey it to the players.
After 9 years of watching Michigan, Michigan St, Purdue, Ohio St., Indiana and Wisconsin always at the top of the BIG by playing defense you'd think Fran would get the idea that defense is part of the game. If nothing changes next year, this board will explode in a thousand pieces.

Ah yes, the horror of another year in the NCAA tournament
 
Toussaint is NOT a difference maker. I thought a week ago that it was laughable how many of you were taking solace in ISU's woes....there BB program is LIGHT YEARS ahead of ours from recruiting to atmosphere. Please do not make fun of them anymore until we have our own S cleaned up...just look at the athletic build of our players vs that of major programs....we look like a Tipton JV squad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ihawkhoops
Because Fran's senior laden squads have all kicked so much ass, right?
I'm not expecting miraculous buzzer beaters next year.
Iowa will be hoping for the bubble yet again down the stretch next year.
Yes. The team with Woody, Gesell and Sapp was excellent. Next years team will be good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: skydog0784
Are we still pretending 2 buzzer beaters makes Iowa a real tourney team?
Iowa also lost on a tip in at the buzzer to Maryland and Glynn Watson shot better than he ever has or ever will in his career to lead a comeback for Nebraska. Not to mention one of those buzzer beaters answered a BS would-be game winning 3 by Baker of Rutgers.

Northwestern is the only game Iowa “shouldn’t have” won but did, and I think the Hawks have gotten unlucky enough to offset that
 
Toussaint is NOT a difference maker. I thought a week ago that it was laughable how many of you were taking solace in ISU's woes....there BB program is LIGHT YEARS ahead of ours from recruiting to atmosphere. Please do not make fun of them anymore until we have our own S cleaned up...just look at the athletic build of our players vs that of major programs....we look like a Tipton JV squad.
That program in Ames that is light years ahead of us, lost to us by 14 points back in December. Enjoy your weekend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: unclesammy
That program in Ames that is light years ahead of us, lost to us by 14 points back in December. Enjoy your weekend.

We beat UM early in the year too.

And their program is legitimately light years away from ours (and isu)

Isu is definitely not light years better, that's a really lazy use of hyperbole, but their program is undeniably ahead of ours.

The frustrating thing is they shouldn't be. Their biggest advantage is Jamie Pollard vs Barta.

Iowa fans are way to content to settle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LaQuintaHawkeye
Fact:Iowa will be in the tourney which makes them a tourney team.

Anyone denying the Hawks that designation is insane or ignorant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RocknRollface
Iowa also lost on a tip in at the buzzer to Maryland and Glynn Watson shot better than he ever has or ever will in his career to lead a comeback for Nebraska. Not to mention one of those buzzer beaters answered a BS would-be game winning 3 by Baker of Rutgers.

Northwestern is the only game Iowa “shouldn’t have” won but did, and I think the Hawks have gotten unlucky enough to offset that

Rutgers 3 wasn't BS. It was just a 3.
Marylands tip wasn't a buzzer beater.
Watson shooting has nothing to do with buzzer beaters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LaQuintaHawkeye
I suspect after next years 18 wins or so, Fran won't have too many fans left on his side.
It's fine tho. I'm not in this to say "I told you so".
We will all be on the same side soon enough.
 
There is nothing on the horizon next year that suggests Iowa will be substantially different and better IMO. We would be smart to cut bait a year early, my guess is that Barta will give him another couple years to fail back to the point where Lick left this team.
Get rid of Franny. Go after T.J. Otzelberger, South Dakota State
 
  • Like
Reactions: RocknRollface
Rutgers 3 wasn't BS. It was just a 3.
Marylands tip wasn't a buzzer beater.
Watson shooting has nothing to do with buzzer beaters.
Your original post was essentially stating that Iowa is lucky to be in the tournament because they hit a couple buzzer beaters. My response was that Iowa has gotten extremely unlucky at multiple points this year as well. And if Rutgers’ 3 was “just a 3” despite hitting every part of the hoop, then Iowa’s two buzzer beaters were “just 3’s” that happened to go in as time expired.
 
That's a reasoned argument and shows some analysis and thought....not the typical childish, spoiled brat, pouting crap we see from so many on here.....and I sincerely appreciate your approach-thoughts even if we disagree slightly. This makes the type of discussion I hope for on these boards possible...

So, in that spirit this is where my thoughts go that might diverge slightly from yours. I think it also points out (in my mind more accurately) one of Fran's system faults......so one) this Iowa team is filled with players who have 2-3 seasons of significant game experience. I look at the 2-3 years of experience and results as a significant improvement over the 1-2 years experience of last year....an increase of 8 wins at this point. Now hopefully that extrapolates out to another improvement when the majority of the roster is at 3-4 years in the program. I WOULD NOT count on another 8 win improvement...but if they win 3 or 4 more at this stage of the season 25/26 wins then we are looking at very high levels of success, historically, at Iowa.

two) these Iowa players have a low ceiling athletically and talent-wise. We might have a more significant difference of opinion here....my position: we are not a high level team athletically (and I would love more athleticism) but this team is adequate from an athletic standpoint...Joe W, Maishe, Isaiah, and I think Joe T, Patrick, and even Nunge for his size are pretty good athletes...not exceptional, but upper 3rd of the B10. If Cook comes back he is obviously elite level in athleticism....talent I see differently and I understand these terms are somewhat ambiguous. But I think of skill, basketball smarts, and coordination, combined with an adequate level of athleticism equate to talent...and again, this team has enough. To take this a step further, there have been many many teams over the years that have high level success with talent/athleticism similar to this team. I think of a number of Bo Ryan teams and even Loyola of Chicago(?) last year that made the final four?...don't remember exactly but you probably know who I'm talking about.

All that said, do I wish for more athletes and talent....yes-absolutely. Do I want Iowa to be the Duke of the Midwest, yes as much as I hate Duke...do I think we could do better than Fran....certainly that is possible but moving him along with the hope that we do better isn't enough for me to think we should risk another 10-15 years of worse.

Make no mistake, that is not the "but Lick" argument....it's what I see as reality. DON'T change coaches (from someone who is relatively successful and "might" do more still) without a REALLY good shot at getting someone better.....not worth it.

I think we are improved next year....and the upcoming recruiting classes are HUGE for the future of this program. My bet is that we are better staying the course than making a move when a coach has won 22 games this year and won more than 20 for 5 of the last 7?.....If he was going to be fired it should have been after last year.

These people who post here, who claim to be Iowa fans....and immediately shout for firing the coach as soon as we lose a game (and player X sucks because they had an off game) will NEVER be satisfied...ever...Then when some of us support the coach or players after a bad game or bad stretch....we're satisfied? Hardly, we just see a bigger picture.

This is a good post. By and large, I agree with you and enjoy good discussion too.

I roll my eyes at knee-jerk posts as well. I think there's a way to discuss player performances without volatility and losing a grip on reality. The truth is this team overachieved this year and every player in the rotation provided something positive throughout the season. No one was consistent, but no one is Zion Williamson either. They got the most out of their talent. If I had a concern as it relates to the players, it would be too many allowed their defense to suffer if they were frustrated on offense. To me, that's inexcusable. Maximum effort should always be given on defense regardless.

You hit the nail on the head. It's about the bigger picture. Is the program trending up or sustaining a high level of success? The latter is impossible at Iowa, there will always be down seasons, but the former needs to be the objective. Will Iowa be better next year? I don't know. That makes for great debate, all of which is speculative.

For me, Fran should have been fired after Year 8. His buyout makes that a moot point, but that is my position. So, again, the question becomes: what is this program's ceiling? In my opinion, we have already seen it under Fran, and that is my biggest concern with Fran being here at least another 2-4 seasons, because it prolongs the inevitable reset. Again, if he was to be fired it should have happened last year. You can't fire a 22-win coach after improving that much from last season, so, as already established, the firing chat is moot. And that's a point a lot of hysterical fans don't grasp. If you want to be mad at someone, be mad at the AD.
 
This is a good post. By and large, I agree with you and enjoy good discussion too.

I roll my eyes at knee-jerk posts as well. I think there's a way to discuss player performances without volatility and losing a grip on reality. The truth is this team overachieved this year and every player in the rotation provided something positive throughout the season. No one was consistent, but no one is Zion Williamson either. They got the most out of their talent. If I had a concern as it relates to the players, it would be too many allowed their defense to suffer if they were frustrated on offense. To me, that's inexcusable. Maximum effort should always be given on defense regardless.

You hit the nail on the head. It's about the bigger picture. Is the program trending up or sustaining a high level of success? The latter is impossible at Iowa, there will always be down seasons, but the former needs to be the objective. Will Iowa be better next year? I don't know. That makes for great debate, all of which is speculative.

For me, Fran should have been fired after Year 8. His buyout makes that a moot point, but that is my position. So, again, the question becomes: what is this program's ceiling? In my opinion, we have already seen it under Fran, and that is my biggest concern with Fran being here at least another 2-4 seasons, because it prolongs the inevitable reset. Again, if he was to be fired it should have happened last year. You can't fire a 22-win coach after improving that much from last season, so, as already established, the firing chat is moot. And that's a point a lot of hysterical fans don't grasp. If you want to be mad at someone, be mad at the AD.
I haven’t been calling for Fran to be fired for the exact reasons you stated. As you said...it is moot. He is going to be here another 3-4 years. Might as well get used to it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LaQuintaHawkeye
This is a good post. By and large, I agree with you and enjoy good discussion too.

I roll my eyes at knee-jerk posts as well. I think there's a way to discuss player performances without volatility and losing a grip on reality. The truth is this team overachieved this year and every player in the rotation provided something positive throughout the season. No one was consistent, but no one is Zion Williamson either. They got the most out of their talent. If I had a concern as it relates to the players, it would be too many allowed their defense to suffer if they were frustrated on offense. To me, that's inexcusable. Maximum effort should always be given on defense regardless.

You hit the nail on the head. It's about the bigger picture. Is the program trending up or sustaining a high level of success? The latter is impossible at Iowa, there will always be down seasons, but the former needs to be the objective. Will Iowa be better next year? I don't know. That makes for great debate, all of which is speculative.

For me, Fran should have been fired after Year 8. His buyout makes that a moot point, but that is my position. So, again, the question becomes: what is this program's ceiling? In my opinion, we have already seen it under Fran, and that is my biggest concern with Fran being here at least another 2-4 seasons, because it prolongs the inevitable reset. Again, if he was to be fired it should have happened last year. You can't fire a 22-win coach after improving that much from last season, so, as already established, the firing chat is moot. And that's a point a lot of hysterical fans don't grasp. If you want to be mad at someone, be mad at the AD.
Spot on. Your third paragraph, which begins with “You hit the nail on the head,” is a key distinguishment. Those who believe that Iowa has the ability to reload and reload and reload and consistently be winning in the NCAA Tournament are out of touch.

At Iowa, Fran has recruited in cycles with disproportionate classes. The Gesell/Woodbury/Uthoff class was his last big class to come through and they peaked as seniors by making the Round of 32. Following that year, Iowa has had to rebuild. Specifically, Fran brought in another large class in 2016, including Bohannon, Cook, Kriener, (following a RS) Moss, and Dailey. From my perspective, it appears that Fran is taking the “developmental program” football approach to winning, hoping that when his big classes are seniors, they can win with chemistry, experience, and skill...

Which brings me to my point. Next year is the “make or break” year for Fran, in my opinion. He fulfilled the preseason expectation of making the Dance this year (presumably, if not he needs to go). Next year is when this “big class” becomes seniors, and when the expectation is that they will deliver. They need to take another step forward from this year, which likely entails winning multiple games in the NCAA Tournament. If he can’t do that through two of his recruiting cycles, I’d like to move on to a coach that can.

The late season fades, the lack of BTT success, I can deal with, as long as the Hawks win when it matters - The Dance

Edit: if Fran significantly ups his recruiting in the 2020 and 2021 classes, which he has a great opportunity to do, my opinion could change
 
Last edited:
We are either beating top 10 teams or losing to NIT teams. No in between.

It's been a strange season with lots of huge highs and rock bottom lows. 22 wins is not awful and neither is finishing 6th in the league and making the NCAA's.
 
This is a good post. By and large, I agree with you and enjoy good discussion too.

I roll my eyes at knee-jerk posts as well. I think there's a way to discuss player performances without volatility and losing a grip on reality. The truth is this team overachieved this year and every player in the rotation provided something positive throughout the season. No one was consistent, but no one is Zion Williamson either. They got the most out of their talent. If I had a concern as it relates to the players, it would be too many allowed their defense to suffer if they were frustrated on offense. To me, that's inexcusable. Maximum effort should always be given on defense regardless.

You hit the nail on the head. It's about the bigger picture. Is the program trending up or sustaining a high level of success? The latter is impossible at Iowa, there will always be down seasons, but the former needs to be the objective. Will Iowa be better next year? I don't know. That makes for great debate, all of which is speculative.

For me, Fran should have been fired after Year 8. His buyout makes that a moot point, but that is my position. So, again, the question becomes: what is this program's ceiling? In my opinion, we have already seen it under Fran, and that is my biggest concern with Fran being here at least another 2-4 seasons, because it prolongs the inevitable reset. Again, if he was to be fired it should have happened last year. You can't fire a 22-win coach after improving that much from last season, so, as already established, the firing chat is moot. And that's a point a lot of hysterical fans don't grasp. If you want to be mad at someone, be mad at the AD.
This sums up my thoughts as well. Fran is fine as the coach and this season is likely a high end year for Fran going forward. I don't really see how Fran is going to significantly improve the program more after 9 seasons. As a fan of Iowa, I really don't understand the level of support for Fran by some fans on here. Again, Fran is doing an average job, I just don't get why people are so defensive when it comes to some fans wanting a new coach.

It is unlikely that Fran will get Iowa above the current level, which is fine. Does Fran have an unlimited amount of time to have seasons like this one?
 
Yes, if Joe T is as good as he is expected to be Fran will play him with and over his son. He has to. Joe has a skillset we desperately need and do not have.

I wouldn’t be so sure of that. He is giving him PT over Moss already this year. I know Connor playing the 1 and Moss playing the 2 but still.
they are both 2/3 tweeners and i would much rather have Moss handling the ball more than have Connor see any serious minutes. Joe T will be riding the pine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ihawkhoops
Iowa won't be worse unless Toussaint isn't the athlete we expect him to be. To have one person that can beat his man off the dribble and stay in front of his man on defense makes this team automatically better next year whether Cook comes back or not.


WHY IN THE **** IS EVERYONE SO WORRIED ABOUT OUR 8TH MAN??? ESPECIALLY WHEN NO ONE ELSE CAN DRIBBLE THE BALL?????

And whose fault is that? Who assessed the needs after last season and decided to run Williams off, move his son to # 2 and forego any transfers? I have not bought into the nepotism rhetoric but it's getting harder to see what Fran thought Connor could do given he is 0 threat to score and isn't good enough in other areas to offset that.

Fran had to get a PG in who could take some heat off of Bohannon, penetrate and kick to open shooters. Connor does none of those things and in fairness to him should not be in this position as a freshman. Bottom line Fran had to get an impact PG not a game manager with no offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LaQuintaHawkeye
This sums up my thoughts as well. Fran is fine as the coach and this season is likely a high end year for Fran going forward. I don't really see how Fran is going to significantly improve the program more after 9 seasons. As a fan of Iowa, I really don't understand the level of support for Fran by some fans on here. Again, Fran is doing an average job, I just don't get why people are so defensive when it comes to some fans wanting a new coach.

It is unlikely that Fran will get Iowa above the current level, which is fine. Does Fran have an unlimited amount of time to have seasons like this one?

Imo theres a window for taking a step up under a coach and Frans has passed.

You have to be able to sell the future as something up and coming and better to get better recruits.

Once you stay the same this long people aren't going to buy the pitch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LaQuintaHawkeye
I wouldn’t be so sure of that. He is giving him PT over Moss already this year. I know Connor playing the 1 and Moss playing the 2 but still.
they are both 2/3 tweeners and i would much rather have Moss handling the ball more than have Connor see any serious minutes. Joe T will be riding the pine.

That's crazy. Moss cant dribble to save his life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DewHawk
I think Iowa has something like one win against teams ranked higher than them (Michigan) in Big 10 play. Only other one might be State. They pretty consistently beat up on the teams worse than them and lose to teams better than them

So, iowa is an slightly above average team in the country’s best conference. That’s more than qualified to make the tourney. Plus I think iowa will benefit from seeing new teams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: unoHawkeye
And whose fault is that? Who assessed the needs after last season and decided to run Williams off, move his son to # 2 and forego any transfers? I have not bought into the nepotism rhetoric but it's getting harder to see what Fran thought Connor could do given he is 0 threat to score and isn't good enough in other areas to offset that.

Fran had to get a PG in who could take some heat off of Bohannon, penetrate and kick to open shooters. Connor does none of those things and in fairness to him should not be in this position as a freshman. Bottom line Fran had to get an impact PG not a game manager with no offense.

I’m sorry, are you suggesting that Williams was better than Connor?

Come on man. Williams left because Connor, who wasn’t even planning to play, was clearly the better option as practice got going.

No disrespect to the kid but Williams was a late signee with no other high major offers, and now he’s a bad player on a bad team in a bad conference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: skydog0784
That's crazy. Moss cant dribble to save his life.

Connor has the most strange turn overs you have ever seen every third trip down the floor. off his foot, pass to no one, off his own backside, pass to the other team. somehow the stat keepers always find a way to attribute the TO to someone else though. Moss doesn’t have these, yes he loses the ball in traffic at times but it seems more glaring because he really doesnt handle the ball that much. He should handle the ball a lot more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ihawkhoops
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT