Look he sucks on D but he’s far and away our best and most efficient offensive player.Krikke is a force?
Freeman has good potential
Look he sucks on D but he’s far and away our best and most efficient offensive player.Krikke is a force?
Freeman has good potential
It’s a young team. I believe that’s the explanationThere is just no other way to say it. It's actually pretty inexcusable in year 14 of a coaching tenure. I'd prepare ourselves for day one of the conference tournament.
.588 shooting percentage, leading scorer, second in rebounds, and 3rd in assists. He is not a center even though he is being made to play center. He is too short. Freeman is the true center type.Krikke is a force?
Frans idea of coaching is to get kicked out. He really does not know what to do right now. Time to move on and start over.There is just no other way to say it. It's actually pretty inexcusable in year 14 of a coaching tenure. I'd prepare ourselves for day one of the conference tournament.
Krikke is a force. His average and shooting percentage is way up there. His supporting cast sleep walks at times. Perkins and Payton can and should often have monster games. Freeman, Dix, and Brock (soon) are very capable of being real stars.
guys playing out of position or tweeners. another Fran staple..588 shooting percentage, leading scorer, second in rebounds, and 3rd in assists. He is not a center even though he is being made to play center. He is too short. Freeman is the true center type.
A. Did you look up the shooting stats of the guys Krikke is guarding or are you just guessing?The guys Krikke has been guarding have been shooting 60% or better and they are also rebounding---something Krikke isn't doing. Look up the shooting stats of opposing bigs in the games we've had vs P5 schools.
I'm not sure that helps come tournament bid time and Michigan at home might be about as easy as it gets.A glimmer of hope is that the B1G men are awash in mediocre to bad teams. pu is legitimate top 10. illinois looks top 25. I'm wouldn't call anyone else good beyond that. And there's plenty of bad.
Yes, this Iowa team doesn't look capable of beating a good team. Fortunately for them with the rest of the conference schedule there's not many of those left.
Terrible loss.I'm not sure that helps come tournament bid time and Michigan at home might be about as easy as it gets.
Yes, it looks like fewer bids for the league.I'm not sure that helps come tournament bid time and Michigan at home might be about as easy as it gets.
I don't think it's a fair or unfair judgment. He's playing the 4-5 on this team. That's his role whether he's a good fit for it or not. He's a wonderful offensive player, but he's a poor defender/rebounder. He averaged less than 6 rebounds per game last year in the Valley.A. Did you look up the shooting stats of the guys Krikke is guarding or are you just guessing?
B. Krikke is playing center when he is not a center. Not a fair judgment. Fran put him in that position. That is on Fran.
which is 1/2 the court.Look he sucks on D but he’s far and away our best and most efficient offensive player.
And you want to replace him with Freeman. We can re-hash this argument all day long but you don't take out your leading scorer and most efficient offensive player. We're not going to be a good defensive team as long as Patrick and Sandfort are out there together at any time. What's also hurting us is that Peyton and Pat aren't really living up to their end on the offensive side of the ball. I'd rather see Freeman and Krikke together more and less Pat but we all know that's not going to happen.which is 1/2 the court.
That seems like a stretch.We're rebuilding and this team will improve as the season moves forward,.. Conference is down this year so I can see us finishing around .500 in Big10 play
Krikke would be better off if he were allowed to guard the 4 vs. the 5, yet if you start Freeman at the 5, he has to stay out of foul trouble and sprinkle in Braun. PMac doesn't rebound so can't really plan the 4, and try as he may, Sandfort gets out muscled by 4's too.And you want to replace him with Freeman. We can re-hash this argument all day long but you don't take out your leading scorer and most efficient offensive player. We're not going to be a good defensive team as long as Patrick and Sandfort are out there together at any time. What's also hurting us is that Peyton and Pat aren't really living up to their end on the offensive side of the ball. I'd rather see Freeman and Krikke together more and less Pat but we all know that's not going to happen.
It's a young bench among the contributors, but the starting group, at least those starting most of the season, are experienced.It’s a young team. I believe that’s the explanation
Unfortunately Iowa just lost to one of the worst teams in conference. That is now four straight losses to big ten teams the last two years and 3 of the losses were to really bad teams.We're rebuilding and this team will improve as the season moves forward,.. Conference is down this year so I can see us finishing around .500 in Big10 play
Your final sentence is the issue. If some combination of Krikke, Freeman, Dembele, and Braun primarily play the 4/5, then Payton and PMac are in direct competition for minutes at the 3 and Fran seems absolutely reluctant for that to happen. The ridiculous starting lineup against Michigan should have been all the proof needed for that.Krikke would be better off if he were allowed to guard the 4 vs. the 5, yet if you start Freeman at the 5, he has to stay out of foul trouble and sprinkle in Braun. PMac doesn't rebound so can't really plan the 4, and try as he may, Sandfort gets out muscled by 4's too.
Why would you have to replace krikke with freeman? Krikke should be a 4 and freeman the 5.And you want to replace him with Freeman. We can re-hash this argument all day long but you don't take out your leading scorer and most efficient offensive player. We're not going to be a good defensive team as long as Patrick and Sandfort are out there together at any time. What's also hurting us is that Peyton and Pat aren't really living up to their end on the offensive side of the ball. I'd rather see Freeman and Krikke together more and less Pat but we all know that's not going to happen.
I don't want to. But I think when Freeman and Krikke are in together it certainly shrinks the court for us offensively. I'm fine with it but that then means Pat or Sandfort sits and I think we know how that works. He's not going to sit Pat. He's getting his 25 minutes. It's just kind of a bad situation he's gotten himself into. Is what it is. Just an odd group of players that really don't fit at the moment.Why would you have to replace krikke with freeman? Krikke should be a 4 and freeman the 5.
If you score 10 and give up 10 you really didn't score.
If our shooters were actually hitting their shots, this team would look much different.
I don't think it's a fair or unfair judgment. He's playing the 4-5 on this team. That's his role whether he's a good fit for it or not. He's a wonderful offensive player, but he's a poor defender/rebounder. He averaged less than 6 rebounds per game last year in the Valley.
To put it another way, he's a perfect fit for Fran's system.
Hes not a pg and fran trying to play him as one at times is not smartI personally feel like Dix will need to learn how to dribble (ISU game) before he becomes a star.
They just don’t have the horses to compete with the big boys this year.There is just no other way to say it. It's actually pretty inexcusable in year 14 of a coaching tenure. I'd prepare ourselves for day one of the conference tournament.
He's definitely not a strong rebounder averaging only 5 per game in 29 minutes. He didn't hit 6 per game playing 35 minutes against Valley competition last year.I can't tell of he's a good rebounder or not because he's out numbered all the time. He looks like he's fighting for his life in there. It was a good idea to add Freeman, but a bad idea about who he replaced.
it shouldn't be tough. He is the coach. Patrick isn't playing well. He should sit.Tough situation for Fran. He has to be rooting for Patrick, who fought through cancer and still is living with residual effects on his body. Problem is that if Patrick is more than a 10/min guy off the bench, it is really hard to have an effective lineup on the court, especially on the defensive end. I would argue that Freeman is the best 5. Krikke is currently their best option at 4, his offense is needed although his defense sucks. Dembele will get much better the more game-time experience he gets, and could play 4 or 5. Payton is the best option at 3, and playing in his natural position might help get him going. For Iowa to win Payton needs to provide offense. Maybe Patrick can play most of the minutes that Payton does not play. Dix or Pryce could also play at 3 against most teams. Perkins is great some games and mediocre others, but needs to be on the court over half of the game. Dix should be his primary back up, although Pryce could get much better than we have seen. Bowen has played pretty well on both ends and should probably start at PG. Harding is even more of a creator on the offensive end, and should also get real minutes. The other guys will play better on offense, if these guys are our primary PGs.
Hard to stay positive after the last 3 games, but there is still some potential. A .500 finish in the B1G might be the best possible, and we won't get there unless Fran changes his rotations IMO.
Only thing is FM would have to be honest with himself to bench PM. Don't see it, sadly.it shouldn't be tough. He is the coach. Patrick isn't playing well. He should sit.
I haven't had a son with cancer, who is then trying to get back to doing what he loves, so I won't judge Fran on that. Patrick does need to come off the bench in spurts. He is actually very good on the point of the press, if they bring him and go to that. We will see if anything changes. I hope so.it shouldn't be tough. He is the coach. Patrick isn't playing well. He should sit.
BTN hosts, who are former players or coaches, have been pointing out defensive issues for years. Fran is too damn stubborn to listen.Any coach worth his salt will tell you that once you start listening to the fans, you're cooked!
Score 14, give up 20. Not a winning strategy.Look he sucks on D but he’s far and away our best and most efficient offensive player.
He's definitely not a strong rebounder averaging only 5 per game in 29 minutes. He didn't hit 6 per game playing 35 minutes against Valley competition last year.
I think we are coming to the same conclusion from different angles. I'm all for a father supporting his son. But that is irrelevant to me in regards to the basketball team. His personal issues or relationships shouldn't determine minutes.I haven't had a son with cancer, who is then trying to get back to doing what he loves, so I won't judge Fran on that. Patrick does need to come off the bench in spurts. He is actually very good on the point of the press, if they bring him and go to that. We will see if anything changes. I hope so.