He'll never make it though... way to much common sense for DC.
This is my US Representative.
- Thread starter coloradonoles
- Start date
He'll never make it though... way to much common sense for DC.
A threatened veto is a snafu?
Your guy owns this shutdown.
Why would the wh send out a letter saying they would veto the bill?
We should lock Crenshaw in a room with Trump. Should be a fair fight as Trump has the bone spurs to deal with and Crenshaw lost the eye fighting as a SEAL. Here are the rules:
Only one person comes out alive and that person is president.
Only one person comes out alive and that person is president.
Sooo....your guy is playing the blame game on Twitter and you find that to be "common sense". Ok.
It's hard to make sense of what happened to this bill. The bills own sponsored ended up not voting for it. It does sound like there was a procedural issue and it's hard to blame democrats when Trump says he will veto and McConnell said it won't go anywhere in the Senate.
If we tied both of Crenshaw's arms behind his back and covered up the other eye, than yes it would be a fair fight. But I'd still put my money on Crenshaw.
So the Democrats not voting for a bill that wouldn't have ended the shutdown makes the shutdown their fault? Sorry, that doesn't beat the President of the United States saying on national TV that he would be honored to own the shutdown and the shutdown would be completely his responsibility. You know what else? He could end the shutdown today if he would just tell Mitch to put the House bill up for a vote. He hasn't done that.
There are no accidents in Washington. There are no “unintended consequences,” only things they knew would happen but didn’t tell us about. Those a-holes may be a bunch of corrupt, amoral bastards, but they are not stupid.
Why would dems vote for it when McConnell wont let anything on the Senate that doesn't have the wall?
A bunch of butthurt, name calling, scaredy-cat Libs in this thread... must have touched a nerve.
This had nothing to do with the shutdown, Cocaine Mitch or Trump... A bill put forward by a Democrat to pay the workers despite the shutdown was unanimously voted for by the GOP and got 6 votes from the Dems.
Unanimous for... all but 6 against.
This had nothing to do with the shutdown, Cocaine Mitch or Trump... A bill put forward by a Democrat to pay the workers despite the shutdown was unanimously voted for by the GOP and got 6 votes from the Dems.
Unanimous for... all but 6 against.
It's not our fault that you are too dense to understand what happened.
Wouldn't the bill Nancy sent Mitch have done the same thing? What was so special about this bill?
You know those people you despise and are always wrong about everything? Here's the thing: they're actually right sometimes. And if you're not careful, you'll end up arguing awful positions just to avoid agreeing with them on anything.
You have become what you abhor.
You have become what you abhor.
The bill has not be brought up for a vote. This was a motion to recommit. Your common sense guy is lying.
This is so perfect.
It's fun watching OP trying to wriggle off the hook. You'd think he's have learned yesterday when we had the same thread.
Congressman trolls his constituents on Twitter.
If he does run for president, he will run as a Republican. That's the dumbest group of voters.
fr
Yes it was a motion to recommit and would amend the Dem CR and extend the funding dates from Dec 22, 2018 to Jan 15, 2018 (from Feb 28, 2018) and pay the workers NOW.
The Bill did in fact passed today with the original date and the workers will get paid when the shutdown is resolved (if of course the Senate passes it and Trump signs it)
So maybe he was playing semantics, maybe stretching reality a wee bit and implying a bill... but nonetheless he wasn't lying or wrong.
First he, nor I, ever said it was a bill.
Yes it was a motion to recommit and would amend the Dem CR and extend the funding dates from Dec 22, 2018 to Jan 15, 2018 (from Feb 28, 2018) and pay the workers NOW.
The Bill did in fact passed today with the original date and the workers will get paid when the shutdown is resolved (if of course the Senate passes it and Trump signs it)
So maybe he was playing semantics, maybe stretching reality a wee bit and implying a bill... but nonetheless he wasn't lying or wrong.
OP is going to have to wear any eye patch now too, with all the shiz that blew back in his face in this thread.
