Ok? Any response? Maybe I'm the onyl one but it remains what he said could have been said by Noam Chomsky or Jeffrey Sachs or the Pope for that matter.
Ok? Any response? Maybe I'm the onyl one but it remains what he said could have been said by Noam Chomsky or Jeffrey Sachs or the Pope for that matter.
You appear to be at a point where you can't exit this discussion without looking like a fool so you continue to dig a deeper hole for yourself.You want me to copy and paste the letter again? JFC you're dense.
By now most of us get that you have irrational, cult like man crushes on Chomsky and Sachs.Ok? Any response? Maybe I'm the onyl one but it remains what he said could have been said by Noam Chomsky or Jeffrey Sachs or the Pope for that matter.
Ok? Any response? Maybe I'm the onyl one but it remains what he said could have been said by Noam Chomsky or Jeffrey Sachs or the Pope for that matter.
By now most of us get that you have irrational, cult like man crushes on Chomsky and Sachs.
That's ok.
But 'name dropping ' and quoting your idols in the end provides no real argument for a ceasefire.
Could these guys possibly be wrong?
It's not difficult to see the evil that Putin presents. He has to be defeated.
Throwing Putin a lifeline at this juncture would would be catastrophic.
Look, I certainly don’t want to find out, but its almost a certainty that Russia’s ability to successfully launch nuclear weapons that successfully reach target with functioning bombs is profoundly under the 1600 active warheads they have. Certainly not zero. But way under 1000. And I am not even taking in account taking out a huge chunk with our air and sea defenses.LOL. Russian defense capabilities looks like it came out of an episode of “Life After People”
You forgot the Pope. I name dropped him too. Yes I mostly agree with them but I believe what I believe thru my own critical thinking. I might add I was also one of the only voices against the Iraq war too. Everybody says they were now.By now most of us get that you have irrational, cult like man crushes on Chomsky and Sachs.
That's ok.
But 'name dropping ' and quoting your idols in the end provides no real argument for a ceasefire.
Could these guys possibly be wrong?
It's not difficult to see the evil that Putin presents. He has to be defeated.
Throwing Putin a lifeline at this juncture would would be catastrophic.
Thousands of civilians were killed in the Donbas since 2014 and yet no one says a word. It's a tragedy but why is Bucha so much more important?Anyone suggesting that the Ukrainians should negotiate now has a screw loose.
The Orcs are animals and should be treated as such. They need to be driven out of Ukraine before any talks begin.
Maybe we should ask the people of Bucha what they think.
![]()
How Russian soldiers ran a 'cleansing' operation in Bucha
The first man arrived at 7:27 a.m. Russian soldiers covered his head and marched him up the driveway toward a nondescript office building. It was a cold, gray morning, March 4 in Bucha, Ukraine. What happened that day in Bucha was what Russian soldiers on intercepted phone conversations called...news.yahoo.com
Thousands of civilians were killed in the Donbas since 2014 and yet no one says a word.
Weird, right @binsfeldcyhawk2 ?
You wouldn't think the GOP would run with this, if they didn't expect their electorate to vote in favor of it....
Thousands of civilians were killed in the Donbas since 2014 and yet no one says a word. It's a tragedy but why is Bucha so much more important?
Dead is dead, but people are not going to look at deliberate executions of civilians the same as civilians caught in random shelling.Thousands of civilians were killed in the Donbas since 2014 and yet no one says a word. It's a tragedy but why is Bucha so much more important?
Do you believe Russia has such a policy? And if so why, what is their motive? It seems very counter beneficial to them (and that's an understatement).Dead is dead, but people are not going to look at deliberate executions of civilians the same as civilians caught in random shelling.
The shelling and low level warfare went on in Donbass for nearly 7 years with almost no American media attention.
I don't think the Russians have anything akin to the Nazi's Einsatzgruppen running around Ukraine massacring civilians are part of a broader extermination policy.Do you believe Russia has such a policy? And if so why, what is their motive? It seems very counter beneficial to them (and that's an understatement).
Greene and her crew of misfits are running on this....
Weird, right @binsfeldcyhawk2 ?
You wouldn't think the GOP would run with this, if they didn't expect their electorate to vote in favor of it....
How many civilians were killed before 2014? What changed in 2014?Thousands of civilians were killed in the Donbas since 2014 and yet no one says a word. It's a tragedy but why is Bucha so much more important?
Dude....THEY ARE CAMPAIGNING FOR IOWA REPUBLICANSGreene and her crew of misfits are running on this....
A coup and a civil war.How many civilians were killed before 2014? What changed in 2014?
see the retracted progressive caucus letter.
Not my party...if I'm wrong and Ukraine aid gets cut off I'll admit as such.Dude....THEY ARE CAMPAIGNING FOR IOWA REPUBLICANS
Time to take a step back, and recognize what your party actually stands for. And maybe re-assess....
They retracted it because it was a political faux pas.....they signed it and sent it Joe.Jeebus.
That retraction was about as sincere as Kyries apologyJeebus.
Greene is the #1 fundraiser for the GOP right now. She is a hot commodity on the campaign trail. Why would Chuck Grassley need her to come stump for him? If the House flips as much as predicted there will be lots of new members who might not be as centrist as you think the GOP is. The leftover moderates may see their survival in 2024 as being dependent on pleasing the Greene wing of the party.Greene and her crew of misfits are running on this....
R's voted unanimously for the Ukraine Lend lease act in the Senate.
There will be less support for Ukraine after this election but still plenty in combination with D's to continue support.
Some of the D support will start to waiver as well.....see the retracted progressive caucus letter.
It's not "Biden's aid"....it's US aid authorized by congress and Biden.
They retracted it because it's not supported by their party.They retracted it because it was a political faux pas
So they only express opinions their party approves of? Sounds like the CCP....They retracted it because it's not supported by their party.