- Sep 13, 2002
- 99,649
- 209,820
- 113
Someone break your television and computer, lol?Not at all true.
Someone break your television and computer, lol?Not at all true.
What? Why would they vote w/ Dems just because they're the majority? When has that ever mattered?JFC...we've covered this.
The Rs currently voting to support aid to Ukraine are doing so because they know the Dems are the majority and will pass the aid bill.
You think if Republicans regain the House that they won't change their view??? McCarthy said as much until he retracted his decree.
It will be too late. Apathy is Putin’s best hope at this time. Email that douche Congressman of yours to support Ukraine. Liddle Marco and Snakehead, too, while you are at it.Guess we’ll find out if you were right in a few months. We’ll revisit when the first funding authorization comes down with the new Congress
Rubio has voted for Ukraine aid every time.It will be too late. Apathy is Putin’s best hope at this time. Email that douche Congressman of yours to support Ukraine. Liddle Marco and Snakehead, too, while you are at it.
A coup or a revolution?A coup and a civil war. Ukraine is very divided politically, east to west.. also divided by language, culture and ethnicity. This aspect is deeply rooted and didn't happen over night. It's even part of a trend toward ethnic revival or ethnic nationalism in former soviet union countries but strong in Ukraine. However, there are no other Russian regions like eastern Ukaine and Crimea in the former USSR. I believe when their president got ousted the eastern regions got fed up and demanded independence, rather than being second class citizens. Yes, Russia supported their cause I believe.
Zelensky even ran in 2019 on revising divisive cultural policies in Ukraine, meaning discrimination against Russians and trying to end the Donbas war. He opposed laws against the Russian language and derussification.. his predecessor supported those. His predecessor cut off pensions to the Donbas in 2017 and utilities.
Those Were the Days
In the spring of 2019 a showman converted himself into a politician, then a statesman. The 73 percent of voters who supported him (or who voted against the incumbent, Petro Poroshenko) in the presidential elections had a clear set of change demands: (1) to find a solution to the Donbas war, (2) to rein in the constantly growing prices for communal services unmatched by an equivalent growth in household income, and (3) to revise divisive cultural policies. Even though Zelensky’s platform as candidate was at best hazy, one thing was crystal clear—here was a man who was different in every way from the hungry hordes of the old elites.
![]()
Just Like All the Others: The End of the Zelensky Alternative?
www.wilsoncenter.org
Rubio, like virtually all Republican or Democratic leadership, is firmly in the neocon camp.Rubio has voted for Ukraine aid every time.
When foreign ambassadors and diplomats are discussing amongst themselves privately who to replace the Ukrainian president with weeks before the violence that compels him to flee for his life, coup is more accurate than revolution.A coup or a revolution?
Duly elected president the US decided to overthrow because they didn’t like the result of the 2010 election.The "foreign government" was Russia, and the "coup" was Putin and his operative Paul Manafort getting Yanukovich to overturn 20 years of Ukrainian plans to join the EU in favor of joining the Russian bloc.
When foreign ambassadors and diplomats are discussing amongst themselves privately who to replace the Ukrainian president with weeks before the violence that compels him to flee for his life, coup is more accurate than revolution.
Operation Ajax was a coup, the religious extremists takeover in Iran was a revolution.
“2 and a half Russians” 😂
PTSDipshittery 😂
That aligns with the known facts.That is the Russian narrative yes.
That aligns with the known facts.
Nuland and our ambassador in Ukraine had their comms intercepted and made public before the coup.
The Neocons were caught red handed, and decided, ‘**** it’ (and “**** the EU”) and went ahead with it anyway.
Calling facts a ‘narrative’ doesn’t conveniently change the facts.
Nobody even disputes the call is a fact, except I guess you, because it doesn’t fit your preferred narrative.That is what the Kremlin says, yes. Sorry but I don’t trust their “facts.”
To Crimea and the Donbas it was a coup. An elected president was forced to flee under duress, fear for his life. When that happens to the guy you support under suspicious circumstances it's a coup for sure. They voted for him 80-90% across the eastern regions. The western regions voted 10-20%. This vote was along language, culture and ethnic lines. Before the wars, some Ukrainians basically had the attitude that it's their country and Russians can get out. When the government also has this attitude this causes a problem for the Russians that have lived there all their lives.. even before Ukraine existed as a separate country.A coup or a revolution?
To Crimea and the Donbas it was a coup. An elected president was forced to flee under duress, fear for his life. When that happens to the guy you support under suspicious circumstances it's a coup for sure. They voted for him 80-90% across the eastern regions. The western regions voted 10-20%. This vote was along language, culture and ethnic lines. Before the wars, some Ukrainians basically had the attitude that it's their country and Russians can get out. When the government also has this attitude this causes a problem for the Russians that have lived there all their lives.. even before Ukraine existed as a separate country.
You’re wrong.False.
You’re wrong.
Here’s the regional map showing vote distribution in the 2010 election.
You assert, without evidence, that this is false?
![]()