I'd add: I'm willing to bet we'll have a shiny new military base in Ukraine within 10 years. It may eventually become as important as Germany has been.I think both are true. We can use Ukraine to do great damage to Russia without putting a single American troop or any actually valuable weaponry at risk. We're essentially giving Ukraine all the stuff we don't really need should we have a conflict so that they can do massive damage to Russia.
Now that's not the same for other countries. Germany is basically unable to defend itself we've learned after a recent report. But for the US, we haven't given Ukraine anything we can't easily afford to give away, and we get the added benefit of it blowing up a bunch of Russian stuff and destroying their ability to wage war for a long time. At the same time, we've discovered that Ukraine will be a shining beacon on a hill if truly given a chance, and will be great friends with the US in a very valuable location. It's a win win, which is why I don't understand any American politician who objects to this war for any reason other than being one of the few people who simply believe all war is wrong, which I can respect at least.
I think it was back during hurricane Opal my brother welded a Honda Accord muffler to the generator. HUGE difference...
I stated that the being in a proxy war isn't its primary motive. It is to defend another country with democratic principles against a country that is violating war crimes and atrocities on a daily basis. The biggest thing is we are deterring the possibility of another war of Russia attacking one of the Nato countries without risking our troops. On your basis its a proxy war, to me it is taking care of 2 birds with 1 stone. They can both be factual at the same time. Where would Russia be if it didn't have the threat of nukes. The threat of nukes is the only reason this war isn't over yet. If Ukraine started going after infrastructure like Russia is, Russia would have folded up like a wet blanket long ago.'Slight'?
Ask yourself where Ukraine would be without western intervention and I think it's hard to keep the word 'slight' in there.
FTFY.
Did you see Macron on 60 Minutes?
I stated that the being in a proxy war isn't its primary motive.
My frustration stems from the view this was ginned up unnecessarily, and I truly wish it had never happened.If you don't think its appropriate to assist Ukraine, I don't know what to say. Also though, lets not undermine the training and soldiers of Ukraine. You can say they have been given decent equipment, but they are taking the Russian soldiers to the woodshed with a much smaller army.
Seminole there are always precursors to any situation. You think currently China doesn't wish Taiwan wasn't allowed to essentially become independent and rule on its own? It doesn't make it right that Russia thinks it can just come in and take what they think is theirs. This war will likely be over in the next 6 months. You claim you want to support Ukraine but you don't support a blank check. Ok, how much money do you think is reasonable to continue to support? The other thing is what if there is only a marginal amount more needed to win the war but you have hit your threshold, you would be done.I think you're talking about Ukraine, but I'm talking about the neocons who pushed a foreign policy that got us here.
I used to take the view they were being naive/stupid with the coup in Ukraine and efforts to push NATO further east over the objections of over NATO members (France and Germany being the biggies, but by no means alone).
But if you take the view that a proxy war was the goal all along, then the steps taken make a lot more sense.
My frustration stems from the view this was ginned up unnecessarily, and I truly wish it had never happened.
That having been said, I think it would be even more immoral to have created this situation, and then leave Ukraine to Russia's tender mercies.
I wouldn't stop supporting Ukraine, but that support isn't a blank check, and the idea we're just going to be a witness to when Ukraine and Russia end this war is kind of silly.
I guess I was thinking the bogeyman we have experienced (at least in my memory) consisted of religious radicals/fanatics who believe their version of the "truth" subjugates/destroys secular government.Yes....the problem is that "business" interests and natural resources often come in conflict with "the will of the people".
Unregulated capitalism is the bogeyman here; industries like oil/gas will prop up anyone who will allow them unfettered access to the resources, and the people get nothing but environmental disasters in exchange. If there were universally-accepted requirements on "% of assets" going to public infrastructure/interests, and environmental requirements, we'd see things turn out differently.
But strongmen and dictators are much easier for capitalists to work with and "pay off", which is the sad reality.
At the time, this was probably a prudent measure.
I would respectfully ask you to stop engaging with this particular poster on this issue. He is either pro-Russia or a determined contrarian for the sake of being a contrarian. The ongoing "debate" (which isn't a debate as he will not budge on his wildly unpopular and mostly misinformed positions) only serves to clutter this otherwise interesting and informative thread.Seminole there are always precursors to any situation. You think currently China doesn't wish Taiwan wasn't allowed to essentially become independent and rule on its own? It doesn't make it right that Russia thinks it can just come in and take what they think is theirs. This war will likely be over in the next 6 months. You claim you want to support Ukraine but you don't support a blank check. Ok, how much money do you think is reasonable to continue to support? The other thing is what if there is only a marginal amount more needed to win the war but you have hit your threshold, you would be done.
We wouldn't be in this situation if Russia didn't attack Ukraine. Ukraine has better leadership now than the government that was overthrown, so I am not sure what your concerns are with that. The fact that we may end up with a another future partner an ally seems to be a good situation don't you think?
He continually puts up his posts regularly, whether I engage or not.I would respectfully ask you to stop engaging with this particular poster on this issue. He is either pro-Russia or a determined contrarian for the sake of being a contrarian. The ongoing "debate" (which isn't a debate as he will not budge on his wildly unpopular and mostly misinformed positions) only serves to clutter this otherwise interesting and informative thread.
Thanks.
He continually puts up his posts regularly, whether I engage or not.
I was going to do the EXACT same thing. He long ago joined the ranks of ingored comrades Warrior Poet31 and Red Runney, and well as a host of racists and MAGAts that I just couldn't take anymore.
Put him on ignore on Page 50, and as long as others don't engage (AHEM Bunsen) it makes for a MUCH better reading experience.I was going to do the EXACT same thing. He long ago joined the ranks of ingored comrades Warrior Poet31 and Red Runney, and well as a host of racists and MAGAts that I just couldn't take anymore.
I don't mean 'blank check' in a literal sense of unlimited dollars, but in the rhetorical sense of unlimited aims.Seminole there are always precursors to any situation. You think currently China doesn't wish Taiwan wasn't allowed to essentially become independent and rule on its own? It doesn't make it right that Russia thinks it can just come in and take what they think is theirs. This war will likely be over in the next 6 months. You claim you want to support Ukraine but you don't support a blank check. Ok, how much money do you think is reasonable to continue to support? The other thing is what if there is only a marginal amount more needed to win the war but you have hit your threshold, you would be done.
We wouldn't be in this situation if Russia didn't attack Ukraine. Ukraine has better leadership now than the government that was overthrown, so I am not sure what your concerns are with that. The fact that we may end up with a another future partner an ally seems to be a good situation don't you think?
Don't read too much into it. That is actually not "new" news (at least here [Germany]).Gather round everybody! I have some shocking news! Germany is reneging on its pledge to meet it's 2% GDP defense spending requirement. Sheesh, just when we started to give them some good press for the Gepards.
https://www.politico.eu/article/ger...nding-promise-warns-about-delays-ukraine-war/
I keep coming back to this video. A few months ago this wouldn't have made the airwaves. Now a lot of doubt and criticism is seeping into mainstream Russian media. Putin's grip is weakening.
Look at Orban trying to change horses in the middle of the race.
Engaging with him only makes it worse. Then those of us who have him on ignore get to see that you are quoting him.He continually puts up his posts regularly, whether I engage or not.
I hear you are on Santa’s nice list and will get what you want.All I want for Christmas is 100k.
I remember when Lucas was spreading disinformation that Azov Battalion was really Putin’s Little Green Men.Engaging with him only makes it worse. Then those of us who have him on ignore get to see that you are quoting him.
He's a compromised moron. You will get a lot more out of this thread by putting him on ignore. Everyone should have him on ignore.
Everyone knows they are part of Putin’s “Little Green Men”, gang. They are not true Ukrainians.
All I want for Christmas is 100k.