Still pulling for one more MLRS.
No surprise, right? Pootie again with the long game.
They've sold several to India since 2004, so they do still produce them. But they have few operational, and it won't be soon replaced.
The big uptick in aircraft downed likely has multiple “sources”, but the F-16 almost has to be a part of it. The “AWACS” losses in particular can dramatically change strategy on both sides.They've sold several to India since 2004, so they do still produce them. But they have few operational, and it won't be soon replaced.
Very curious how they got this one. I suspect we'll soon hear the F-16s have been operational.
There is another significant aspect to all of this, I have seen varying numbers of these aircraft, but the highest was 12 at the beginning of the war. Maybe fewer. 2 have been lost in combat. Figure one is always down for maintenance, there are training requirements, and some must be kept in the Far East to keep US forces and the Chinese honest, and along the border with NATO nations. So, how many do they actually have available to fly over Ukraine, or have they stripped away their security blanket in the Far East?
It isn't just Meloni, there have been a string of high level European leaders visiting Ukraine. I know she triggers a lot of you, but it's long overdue for VP Harris to show support with a visit. I'd honestly prefer Biden stay out given Putin's penchant for assassination. But, Harris probably isn't interesting enough to him to order a hit on. Chuck Schumer was in Kyiv yesterday, which is nice, but a VP visit gets more attention.
What I have heard is they only had 3-4 fully operational. The others were more frames that can be converted. The people operating them though is a major problem.There is another significant aspect to all of this, I have seen varying numbers of these aircraft, but the highest was 12 at the beginning of the war. Maybe fewer. 2 have been lost in combat. Figure one is always down for maintenance, there are training requirements, and some must be kept in the Far East to keep US forces and the Chinese honest, and along the border with NATO nations. So, how many do they actually have available to fly over Ukraine, or have they stripped away their security blanket in the Far East?
No they haven't. While the airframe of the Indian awacs is a il76, the innards are an Israeli phalcon. They haven't sold India a single awacs. The Indian navy now uses Boeing poseidons p8i's for naval surveillance along with American drones. The sole Russian Air asset, the il38 may is retired. Indian airforce uses a home grown awacs on an Embraer business jet airframe soon to move to a Boeing or airbus frame. The phalcon has been a grande dud due to the reliability of iluyshin and India smartly didn't buy any a50 mainstays. The plaaf does use them and their copies. The Indian airforce last bought il76's in the 90's and has since switched to the Boeing c17 and Lockheed Martin c130j hercules.They've sold several to India since 2004, so they do still produce them. But they have few operational, and it won't be soon replaced.
Very curious how they got this one. I suspect we'll soon hear the F-16s have been operational.
3 in service, 2 on order:No they haven't. While the airframe of the Indian awacs is a il76, the innards are an Israeli phalcon. They haven't sold India a single awacs. The Indian navy now uses Boeing poseidons p8i's for naval surveillance along with American drones. The sole Russian Air asset, the il38 may is retired. Indian airforce uses a home grown awacs on an Embraer business jet airframe soon to move to a Boeing or airbus frame. The phalcon has been a grande dud due to the reliability of iluyshin and India smartly didn't buy any a50 mainstays. The plaaf does use them and their copies. The Indian airforce last bought il76's in the 90's and has since switched to the Boeing c17 and Lockheed Martin c130j hercules.
The three is it. End of story. There are no follow ons. Unlike you, I have relatives in that airforce. India doesn't want any more il76 airframes. You're citing ancient shit that has no relevance today.3 in service, 2 on order:
A-50EI (Il-76) of the Indian Air Force with the EL/W-2090
In March 2004, as a part of a tri-partite deal among Israel, India, and Russia, Israel and India signed a US$1.1 billion deal according to which IAI would deliver the Indian Air Force three AEW&C radar systems, each of which was worth approximately $350 million.[3][4] India signed a deal with Ilyushin of Russia for the supply of three Il-76 A-50 heavy airlifters, which were to be used as platforms for these radar systems, for an additional US $500 million. The first aircraft was delivered to India on 25 May 2009, landing at Jamnagar AFS in Gujarat, completing its 8 hour long journey from Israel.[5]
In November, 2016, India signed another deal to purchase two more AEW&C radar systems to purchase two additional systems for $1-1.4 billion, with scheduled within the next 3 years.[6][7] As of end 2023, India has three EL/W-2090 systems in service.[8][9]
Dude you're talking about things that are multiple decades old. Moreover, the radar in those planes is Israeli, not Russian, unlike the normal a50. Only the airframe is the same. If purchases from 2004 make you ejaculate, go nuts.Apology accepted.
That’s a lot to say I was right and you were wrong regarding the sales, but apology accepted.Dude you're talking about things that are multiple decades old. Moreover, the radar in those planes is Israeli, not Russian, unlike the normal a50. Only the airframe is the same. If purchases from 2004 make you ejaculate, go nuts.
You're an idiot but at least consistent.That’s a lot to say I was right and you were wrong regarding the sales, but apology accepted.
I’m sorry I’m not sorry you were demonstrably wrong and can’t seem to accept it.You're an idiot but at least consistent.
The top 5 Russian blunders of the war. The Kyiv Convoy and the failure of Russian air defenses quite rightly rank in the top 5. Both of these blunders show Russia's inability to coordinate and carry out tasks.
https://www.newsweek.com/russia-top-5-blunders-two-years-ukraine-war-1872115
Lol yup you sure did. You're a veritable Jane's Defence.I’m sorry I’m not sorry you were demonstrably wrong and can’t seem to accept it.
Biden is the Commander in Chief and can secure the border anytime he wishes. He just doesn’t want to.More on Speaker Johnson's goal of aiding Russia. (And blocking attempts to stop illegal immigration)
Johnson Intended To Stop Ukraine Aid, Not Pass An Immigration Bill
After months of immigration talks, it is clear Speaker Johnson wanted to prevent the House of Representatives from voting on Ukraine aid.www.forbes.com
Republican control of the House has been a disaster for US foreign policy abroad, and border security at home.
Biden is the Commander in Chief and can secure the border anytime he wishes.
That's not what Fox and Newsmax is telling their viewers.No; he cannot.
Any "policy" or "Executive Order" he tries to put into place has to follow existing laws, or it can be challenged in court.
They realize their viewers are high school dropouts.That's not what Fox and Newsmax is telling their viewers.
Yep. Use simple talk like drump, hook ‘em every time.They realize their viewers are high school dropouts.