Anyone know how the US handles spare parts for weapons? I can understand that the new Leopards replace the older models but don't understand how governments cannot require parts be stocked or provided for older models sold to other countries.
It's very expensive to get parts made when production has ended or been cancelled.I don’t think it’s as much a matter of can’t.
If you told GM and Ford that car production was halted they’d figure out how to make what Uncle Sam was buying.
There isn’t the political will because there isn’t the public will.
Even in Poland you can’t find 1 in 5 that want to put troops in Ukraine.
This is a pretty hawkish echo chamber for the most part.
You have to admire the ability of this country, despite waning support from US and despite China and Iran helping Russia rebuild and rearm to continue to put up a fight and still hold their own and inflict damage. I sure hope they can outlast Russia and the US can really help rearm them and take their gloves off with F-16 and better longer range weapons. This is one of the all-time 300 / David vs Goliath type war tales in world history.
My point was, if this considering a vital national interest we’d tell GM, Ford, Tesla and the rest they’re not allowed to make cars, we need the materials for war production, interested in selling any of that?It's about industrial capacity....we "can" make the parts it's a more a matter of "who" will make them when the companies we go to also supply the current stuff.
That air base at Morzovosk is pretty cool to Google Earth lurk on. You can't really tell when the images were taken, and I don't know why Russia isn't doing more to block images, but you can see berms protecting some planes, with others in the open. Trenches around the perimeter of the base which means the Russians must fear a commando attack. There are random berms and heavy vehicle tracks which suggest rotating missile defense systems.
Antony Blinken, US secretary of state, used meetings with EU and Nato foreign ministers this week to warn Beijing was assisting Moscow “at a concerning scale”, and providing “tools, inputs and technical expertise”, according to three people familiar with the discussions.
“The warnings were explicit,” the person said. “There has been a shift and it was felt in the room . . . this was a new development. It was very striking.”
Speaking before the call, a senior US official said Washington had seen China “start to help to rebuild Russia’s defence industrial base, essentially backfilling the trade from European partners”. One person familiar with the situation said the Biden administration was particularly concerned about the provision of propellant for missiles.
https://www.ft.com/content/ba524406-ee6c-4c39-9ac2-110a2549569a