Right, and I was trying to explain to others that if it wasn't for the giant chip on your shoulder you could have simply acknowledged that you misunderstood what the author was saying rather than "sticking to your guns" with this "bullshit agenda" story.
Either way, it's in the past, some might find the explanation useful and will be able to better tailor their messages for you in the coming pages of this thread.
I don't know or care what is on your shoulder but it seems to be blocking the simple fact that all those things people said it kinda means we're even referenced. It isn't a "liberal democracy" in that article. The word democracy is used once. It's a decent article that went to shit with a dumb agenda.