I've been saying since this war began that the average Ukrainian looks nearly identical to most Badger fans. It's kind of uncanny.Dude looks like your typical Iowan ordering his 8th Busch Latte in any small town bar.
Nah, his in depth knowledge of west Davenport dive bars is legit.Me only now just realizing that Whiskey is just another dadgum alt troll account started less than 2 years ago by the same angry attention whore troll who started all those other angry alt accounts I blocked.
![]()
Why doesn't SHE run for president? That is a Republican I could support. (sorry for the political post, but it seems only the conservative posters cry about that and most of them probably like Condi so I should be fine.)
Definitely, considering the Patriot may not deserve its early reviews:Well this sounds very convenient 😎.
Don't let the door hit you on the ass on the way out.This used to be a good thread.
Now it's just a BAU HROT dumpster fire.
And NATO will do nothing.
Global warming is out of control.
I totally agree.Why doesn't SHE run for president? That is a Republican I could support. (sorry for the political post, but it seems only the conservative posters cry about that and most of them probably like Condi so I should be fine.)
I’m all for sanctions and shunning Russia but this is dumb lol
So Patriot is not an answer to Russian missiles in Ukraine?Definitely, considering the Patriot may not deserve its early reviews:
Link
During the 1991 Gulf War, the American public was informed that the Patriot missile had a near-perfect record, intercepting a total of 45 out of 47 Scud missiles.
This estimate was later revised down by the US army to about 50 percent. Even then, it noted "higher" confidence in only about 25 percent of the cases.
A Congressional Research Service employee commented that if the US army had consistently and accurately applied its assessment method, the number would be far lower. Reportedly, this number was one Scud missile shot down.
Following a House Committee on Government Operations investigation, not enough evidence was found to conclude that there had been any interceptions at all.
Bush story on PutinWhy doesn't SHE run for president? That is a Republican I could support. (sorry for the political post, but it seems only the conservative posters cry about that and most of them probably like Condi so I should be fine.)
I dunno. Lower right looks like an em-50
. Not likely that Russia is capable of replacing their equipment. The time and cost to build a tank has got to be a whole different level. Everything I see that they are using is Soviet era armor.During a long drive today I found myself wondering about the supply of Javelin missiles as I caught updates on NPR. I found this article, and though the supply is good, the burn rate of the arsenal is pretty high. More troubling is that we are not upgrading our replacement / supply. There is also an Iowa tie in. The warheads are manufactured in SE Iowa and the munitions plant has seen portions of it mothballed, and updates pushed down the road. Dave Loebsack pushed to get funding, but decades of decline are affecting production.
Also, is it crazy to think that Russia could pull off an attack to cripple US production?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/craigh...s-outstripping-us-production/?sh=73fbb9142409
Uh, Babylon bee.I’m all for sanctions and shunning Russia but this is dumb lol
That's a fair point, but I am also thinking of the development and procurement aspects the article brings up. It's a pretty long timeline. And, what if the North Koreans decided to come over the DMZ?. Not likely that Russia is capable of replacing their equipment. The time and cost to build a tank has got to be a whole different level. Everything I see that they are using is Soviet era armor.
The fact that she doesn’t want to be president instantly moves her to the top of my list.Why doesn't SHE run for president? That is a Republican I could support. (sorry for the political post, but it seems only the conservative posters cry about that and most of them probably like Condi so I should be fine.)
And chemical weapons are considered just one step below nuclear weapons. If used will this bring in the West?And NATO will do nothing.
I hope that after 60 years of a constant state of war footing in South Korea, that they have everything thing there already as far as prepositioned equipment to mount a defense. Nonetheless I have no issue with modernization of the Middletown operation.That's a fair point, but I am also thinking of the development and procurement aspects the article brings up. It's a pretty long timeline. And, what if the North Koreans decided to come over the DMZ?
They are already killing citizens, children, etc and no one does anything. Outside of dropping a nuke on Ukraine or bombing an ally, we aren’t doing anything about it. I doubt chemical attacks would change thatAnd chemical weapons are considered just one step below nuclear weapons. If used will this bring in the West?
They are already killing citizens, children, etc and no one does anything. Outside of dropping a nuke on Ukraine or bombing an ally, we aren’t doing anything about it. I doubt chemical attacks would change that
Shhh. It’s slow joe’s pudding time.They are already killing citizens, children, etc and no one does anything. Outside of dropping a nuke on Ukraine or bombing an ally, we aren’t doing anything about it. I doubt chemical attacks would change that
Actually, I do think breaking that norm would force a few of the nations on the sidelines to make a choice. Even China would have a tough time ignoring large scale use of gas.They are already killing citizens, children, etc and no one does anything. Outside of dropping a nuke on Ukraine or bombing an ally, we aren’t doing anything about it. I doubt chemical attacks would change that
You want me to exhume 5 or 6 Bill Clinton quotes about Putin after he came to power? No, I didn't think so. Keep the thread out of the political gutter then...Here's the war criminal who lied us into a 20 year war and presided over one of the largest economic crashes of all time back in 2001
"I looked the man in the eye. I found him very straightforward and trustworthy – I was able to get a sense of his soul."
John McCain, close to a decade later
Part of me wants to laugh. The other part of me thinks they will be driven by saboteurs blending into the general population.I dunno. Lower right looks like an em-50