I did not like the part describing Ukraine having troubles feeding replacements into their forces. Hope it is just minor growing pains since they are expanding into a huge (700,000 they claim) army.
Throughout this debacle, it has been clear to me that Russians don't have night vision. It is absolutely imperative to any night time combat. If Ukraine can get enough of them, this is over much faster.
First time I used them I was amazed at what you could see.
So you think Russia is doing all this for a road to Crimea? There's already a road around the other way.It certainly is, if it provides him a clear land-bridge from Russia to Crimea.
We already have a Natty Light so I am going to call you Natty Ice.So you think Russia is doing all this for a road to Crimea? There's already a road around the other way.
When trying to determine a motive, maybe listen first and then go ahead and try to discredit it. I just saw this yesterday. Here Putin basically says in December 2021 that a war is coming if he doesn't get security guarantees and guarantees from the US to quit putting weapons on the Russian border. He says that Nato is in it's 5th wave of expansion and no one has listened to Russian concerns. He also says earlier in the 4 hour forum, not here, that he is currently in talks with Biden. In other words, maybe preventable.
Chomsky said in January 2022, "Ukraine is the most dangerous crisis in the world but also the most easily preventable."
The fact remains that Russia has invaded a neighbor (yet again) and NATO has not. There was zero threat of Ukraine or NATO attacking Russia.So you think Russia is doing all this for a road to Crimea? There's already a road around the other way.
When trying to determine a motive, maybe listen first and then go ahead and try to discredit it. I just saw this yesterday. Here Putin basically says in December 2021 that a war is coming if he doesn't get security guarantees and guarantees from the US to quit putting weapons on the Russian border. He says that Nato is in it's 5th wave of expansion and no one has listened to Russian concerns. He also says earlier in the 4 hour forum, not here, that he is currently in talks with Biden. In other words, maybe preventable.
Chomsky said in January 2022, "Ukraine is the most dangerous crisis in the world but also the most easily preventable."
I believe that's been their primary goal all along. They want complete and unfettered access to the sea there. Anything else they can gain and any damage they can do to Ukraine so they can't fight back to retake it in the future is all just icing for them. At the very least Ukraine has to keep fighting until they can reclaim their coastline again and Russia is unable to retake them. Odessa cannot fall, and Mariupol needs to be retaken. I don't know that Crimea is ever going to come back, but the rest is certainly all within range by the end of the year. And I'd like to see Nato plant missiles right on the coast aimed at Crimea in case Russia gets uppity again.And I continue to pray that no matter what, the West will never let this happen.
So, now weapons on your border is zero threat. Maybe someone should have told JFK in the Cuban missile crisis.The fact remains that Russia has invaded a neighbor (yet again) and NATO has not. There was zero threat of Ukraine or NATO attacking Russia.
Your propaganda holds no water.
So I haven't really been paying attention to you and there are thousands of posts in this thread. What is your position? The United States is to blame for giving a country the means to defend itself when another country attempts to wipe it off face of the Earth? Or the United States is to blame in some manner for allowing Ukraine to exist, so Russia is justified in attempting to wipe it off the face of the Earth? If it is about having weapons on a border, that's been the case for the entire world since the advent of ICBMs and subs that can fire missiles with nuclear warheads. The Cuban missile crisis was in 1962 before most of that was in play.So, now weapons on your border is zero threat. Maybe someone should have told JFK in the Cuban missile crisis.
Look, you guys got criticizing Putin under control, I'm criticizing our own government because I think they also deserve some criticism.
No, there is not. Not a major land access route.So you think Russia is doing all this for a road to Crimea? There's already a road around the other way.
There were no weapons in Ukraine. The West was so paranoid about Putin invading, they would not allow Ukraine to join NATO for fear it would bring on an attack. Turns out Putin is crazy enough he decided to attack anyway.So, now weapons on your border is zero threat. Maybe someone should have told JFK in the Cuban missile crisis.
Look, you guys got criticizing Putin under control, I'm criticizing our own government because I think they also deserve some criticism.
Needs said again. You're an odd sort of poster.So, now weapons on your border is zero threat. Maybe someone should have told JFK in the Cuban missile crisis.
Look, you guys got criticizing Putin under control, I'm criticizing our own government because I think they also deserve some criticism.
lesson is don’t give up your nukes…..and acquire them if you don’t have them.
My postion is pretty well aligned with Noam Chomsky, not exactly. The US is right to give weapons to Ukraine to defend itself but they should be carefully calibrated not to escalate the war into something much bigger. The US should try to be actively involved in the negotiations to end the war. There are things the US can bring to the table, being the most powerful country on earth (with tremendous leverage and bargaining power) that would probably end the war quickly. The US could have prevented this war but chose not to on principle and disregarding any Russian security concerns, even legitimate concerns. Ukraine and Georgia are a red line for any Russian leader per Chomsky. The US Ukraine joint partnership in September set everything in motion, which made Ukraine a defacto member of Nato, offered enhanced weapons and military "research" agreement. Big plans, I can't remember everything. It's on the whitehouse website.So I haven't really been paying attention to you and there are thousands of posts in this thread. What is your position? The United States is to blame for giving a country the means to defend itself when another country attempts to wipe it off face of the Earth? Or the United States is to blame in some manner for allowing Ukraine to exist, so Russia is justified in attempting to wipe it off the face of the Earth? If it is about having weapons on a border, that's been the case for the entire world since the advent of ICBMs and subs that can fire missiles with nuclear warheads. The Cuban missile crisis was in 1962 before most of that was in play.
This does not make any sense and is wholly unrelated to the Cuban missile crisis which you cited as an analog. Russia state TV and Russia’s actions have made clear this is nothing more than imperialism and what you cite is mere pretext. Russia got the tip of its dick wet with crimea and part of eastern Ukraine and then it wanted to rape the whole country into submission and out of existence.My postion is pretty well aligned with Noam Chomsky, not exactly. The US is right to give weapons to Ukraine to defend itself but they should be carefully calibrated not to escalate the war into something much bigger. The US should try to be actively involved in the negotiations to end the war. There are things the US can bring to the table, being the most powerful country on earth (with tremendous leverage and bargaining power) that would probably end the war quickly. The US could have prevented this war but chose not to on principle and disregarding any Russian security concerns, even legitimate concerns. Ukraine and Georgia are a red line for any Russian leader per Chomsky. The US Ukraine joint partnership in September set everything in motion, which made Ukraine a defacto member of Nato, offered enhanced weapons and military "research" agreement. Big plans, I can't remember everything. It's on the whitehouse website.
Russia should pay for everything starting with their reserve fund $300b. I think they would pay almost any price to get out of this, jmho, but aren't going to leave because then they wouldn't have any bargaining power.
Also, the US position to weaken Russia does not align exactly with Ukraine's goal (the people of Ukraine represented by Zelensky), which is to end the war without giving up territory. This war will only truly end thru diplomacy as Zelensky has said.
Of course. Hwk23, nat, natty lite, and warrior poet will chime in it’s for everyone’s own good to do to this to bring a speedy as possible closure to the “special operation”.
The US was giving weapons to Ukraine, and other big plans, including NATO membership. This is September 2021.There were no weapons in Ukraine. The West was so paranoid about Putin invading, they would not allow Ukraine to join NATO for fear it would bring on an attack. Turns out Putin is crazy enough he decided to attack anyway.
This was all after Russia invaded the Crimea and Eastern Ukraine.
This isn't 1962 and you're just flat wrong here. Russia started this war. Even after 2014, NATO didn't attack Russia.So, now weapons on your border is zero threat. Maybe someone should have told JFK in the Cuban missile crisis.
Look, you guys got criticizing Putin under control, I'm criticizing our own government because I think they also deserve some criticism.