Cuz just like tanks, they never, ever need any maintenance to keep them functional, Amiright?Russia has 7,000 nuclear warheads. They will never be neutralized.
Plus due to treaty, the US and Russia only have 1600 hundred deployed nukes.Cuz just like tanks, they never, ever need any maintenance to keep them functional, Amiright?
Why is that the question? I don't care what Ukraine wants. The US should be making decisions based on US interests, not Ukraine's.
NoThat's another myth. They won't be neutralized at least not for long. Most of Asia is now trending together with Russia
What "boarders"?Is Russia no longer a threat when the 2014 boarders are returned?
Weird that this isn't what you'd posted earlier...Ok…but dictating the terms of their support sure is.
With the volume of civilian casualties, I think Ukraine's goals become greater.
China is the world's largest importer of food.Just the countries I listed have a greater gdp than Europe. iPhones are made in China and India.
How is it in the US interests to allow Russia to maintain hold of an area of land that allows them to do this all over again, and threaten Ukraine's port access to the Black Sea? And threaten worldwide grain supplies?I feel this is deliberately coy/obtuse.
Ukraine‘s war aims are limited by what NATO (read: The US) will support them doing.
e.g. They don’t march into Crimea if it means we quit giving them arms.
I don’t think any other appreciation of the situation is grounded in reality.
Are we keeping them in the dark about what would make the U.S. drop support, or have we told them we’ll back them all the way to the 1991 border?
Do Americans deserve to know what’s on the check the White House is writing Ukraine, because we don’t have a treaty to defend them that was adopted by our Senate.
Exactly this.How do countries joining NATO threaten Russia? Just in simple terms. Please explain.
Has any country expressed desire to attack or invade Russia? No.
It is much more likely that NATO membership will make it more difficult for Russia to meddle in their border country’s affairs and keep them under their influence. That is no threat. It is a delusional rationale that must be rejected by thinking people like yourself @hwk23
At the risk of being naughty in this thread and stating something political, I miss the likes of McCain and his ilk, on both sides of the aisle.I think it has much more to do with Russia's inability to resupply their forces.
They are running out of tanks, artillery, drones, etc.
And they have nowhere near the logistical and battlefield reconnaissance levels the Ukrainians have with NATO resources. Ukraine will completely eliminate Russia's land/bridge access to Crimea, and when that happens, Russia will completely lose that territory.
Whether Russia uses a dirty bomb or nukes is up to them, but if that happens, the West is opening up an entirely new level of hurt for them.
The world now realizes that when John McCain said "Russia is a gas station masquerading as a country. It’s kleptocracy, it’s corruption", he was 100% right.
It's state-run mafia, and the antithesis to democracy and freedom. And when that state-run mafia becomes too powerful, it threatens freedom around the globe. The world will need to figure out how to deal with China, next, because they're trending in this same direction.
How so? By dictating terms of support you have a huge influence on the final peace terms. To say otherwise is extremely naive.Weird that this isn't what you'd posted earlier...
Good article to read. The full ramifications of what Russia has done to itself have not come home yet.
#MisspelledLithuaniagrad.....Good article to read. The full ramifications of what Russia has done to itself have not come home yet.
How so? By dictating terms of support
Pre 2022 invasion territory or pre 2014 territory?NATO has not "dictated" any terms.
European NATO members are 100% behind Ukraine driving Russia out of their territory. Because they know if Russia wins anything, they may be next.
Pre 2022 invasion territory or pre 2014 territory?
I can agree with that…the question is what’s the US/NATO position on the subject. Hasn’t been stated to my knowledge.If Russia keeps Crimea, they will always have a pretext to invade Ukraine’s other territory. Land access and water access. Russia needs to be booted out of Crimea to end this open ended threat to Ukraine’s sovereignty.
A better way to ask this may be: if putin came to zelensky today and said "crimea is now russia and we leave any January 2022 Ukrainian borders. Deal or not?". Will NATO disagree of zelensky accepted?I can agree with that…the question is what’s the US/NATO position on the subject. Hasn’t been stated to my knowledge.
I’m thinking NATO would be good with that.A better way to ask this may be: if putin came to zelensky today and said "crimea is now russia and we leave any January 2022 Ukrainian borders. Deal or not?". Will NATO disagree of zelensky accepted?
That’s not even the main point of the video. The White House had every opportunity to avoid this war. He said they had multiple concerns.. Yet virtually no attempt was made.The same old tired schtick about nato expansion.
You keep harping on that point regardless of the fact the man running the show has said that's not the reason many times over now.
At this point, you're literally arguing w/ putin about putins motives.
NopeThat’s not even the main point of the video. The White House had every opportunity to avoid this war.
Chomsky said that in January as well. It’s not Russian propaganda.Nope
More Russian propaganda here.