With Caitlin they will want iowa to go far/ into final four for ratings, eyeballs and hypeCommittee will put us in with South Carolina.
With Caitlin they will want iowa to go far/ into final four for ratings, eyeballs and hypeCommittee will put us in with South Carolina.
With Caitlin they will want iowa to go far/ into final four for ratings, eyeballs and hype
Again, lots of key games to be played. Could possibly play the number 2 team twice plus Indiana. Win 2 of those 3 at least and we’re minimum the 5 overall.The problem? At the time of the reveal, if the season had ended there, if both teams kept winning, Iowa would face South Carolina in the Elite 8.
Albany 1
1 South Carolina
7 IOWA
12 Oregon State
16 Oklahoma
Ohio St is currently the 2. Don’t want a conference rematch. Possibly the 4th time.Curious, why does the 1 seed play the 7 seed, instead of the 8 seed. Seems like the 2 seed should play the 7 seed.
Yes but Ckark cant di it all . Bluder failed by not getting one decent transfer. This team isnt as good as last years.
You do have to wonder if Paige hadn't been injured for two years would Clark have been allowed to seize the crown, (which she so clearly earned), or would the media have continued their UCONN bias. Remember that Clark led the nation in scoring as a freshman, BUT Paige was the national player of the year....I'll say this, Iowa without Clark would continue to get the disrespect in the rankings they'd always gotten.
It took Clark 2.5 yrs and injuries to Paige Beuckers to change that thinking.........
It’s possible the media would have continued their bias. The fan support for Clark is not something that has ever been seen in women’s basketball though so there’s no way they could continue to ignore her while promoting Paige.You do have to wonder if Paige hadn't been injured for two years would Clark have been allowed to seize the crown, (which she so clearly earned), or would the media have continued their UCONN bias. Remember that Clark led the nation in scoring as a freshman, BUT Paige was the national player of the year....
What sort of asinine reasoning results in this? Why does the overall 1 not face the "worst" 2?unfortunately #1 (South Carolina) and #7 (Iowa) are in one region and #2 (Ohio State) and #8 (Southern Cal) are in another region
I certainly agree, BUT I really think CC had the better year as a freshman and yet PB won ALL the awards, except the Dawn Staley..It’s possible the media would have continued their bias. The fan support for Clark is not something that has ever been seen in women’s basketball though so there’s no way they could continue to ignore her while promoting Paige.
Some of it is in the moment reactions.
Some of it is who we're losing to, and how...............
Losing to Nebraska the way we did, isn't deserving of a top 5 ranking.
If we beat Ohio State and get to the BTT Finals (meaning not being mental midgets and beating Indiana again), then we'll have re-earned a top 5 ranking and a shot at a 1 seed.
You do have to wonder if Paige hadn't been injured for two years would Clark have been allowed to seize the crown, (which she so clearly earned), or would the media have continued their UCONN bias. Remember that Clark led the nation in scoring as a freshman, BUT Paige was the national player of the year....
Welp guess I'm betting all my money on Ohio State then.
Iowa covers ... 93-83.
I would think for tv ratings they’d want Caitlin Clark playing on East Coast time in the Albany Regional. Some of those Portland games could be tipping off pretty late for the rest of the country.
Let’s be honest here, put Iowa in Hawaii at 2 am CST and ratings will still soar. No one might go to work next day, but we’d all be watching.I would think for tv ratings they’d want Caitlin Clark playing on East Coast time in the Albany Regional. Some of those Portland games could be tipping off pretty late for the rest of the country.
The entire tournament set records for every round. It had nothing to do with location. The hype and mainstream coverage for Iowa is on a different level now. They want her in primetime.You mean like last year when the Seattle ratings were so terrible?
odd number of knee injuries yesterday.
The entire tournament set records for every round. It had nothing to do with location. The hype and mainstream coverage for Iowa is on a different level now. They want her in primetime.
“They” being the networks and the NCAA. If you can’t see “they” don’t want Iowa tipping off at 10pm eastern, then I got nothing for you.Who is they...and how do you determine primetime? Based on where you live or where I live?
Obviously the "they" you refer to doesn't feel the need for these games to be at the time your opinion dictates...the championship game is still in the afternoon.
The funny thing is both Seattle games last year were pretty much as prime time as you can get
How in the hell is a top 4 team a 7 seed???One half of the bracket 5 days ago:
Albany 1
1 South Carolina
7 IOWA
12 Oregon State
16 Oklahoma
Portland 4
4 UCLA
5 Virginia Tech
10 UConn
15 Gonzaga
I think that's the overall seed, so a 2 seed bracketwise but the 7th overall seed.How in the hell is a top 4 team a 7 seed???
Monica was dominant at post scoring using post position and post moves. She had hook shots, up and unders, and a reliable inside game that is missing this year. Hannah is improving, and has much better speed, but a good big mobile post is going to overpower her. One of the issues we've had all year is that there are only a few teams in the country that can bring that sort of post presense, SC, Colorado, UCLA? So for 80+ percent of our games Hannah is the better option, but from elete 8 on up, the 2 biggest things that are likely to cause a loss are an off 3 pt shooting night and getting beat inside.It’s better, per most measurable metrics, plus the 6th best schedule. I’m not sure how anyone, outside of just being contrary, can objectively say last years team was “better”
They aren’t better at rebounding or defense or offense….so where exactly are they better
Not a 7 seed, that is saying #7 in the selection process, which equates to a #2 seed.How in the hell is a top 4 team a 7 seed???
Ahh that makes more sense, but now they deserve a #1 seed. They've beaten several top 10 teams!Not a 7 seed, that is saying #7 in the selection process, which equates to a #2 seed.
“They” being the networks and the NCAA. If you can’t see “they” don’t want Iowa tipping off at 10pm eastern, then I got nothing for you.
Again, Iowa last year was nothing compared to the TV juggernaut it is now. Things have changed. Keep up!