Play the tape.
MAGAts?? A little help? The best part is the applause at the end of that mosh pit of verbiage.
MAGAts?? A little help? The best part is the applause at the end of that mosh pit of verbiage.
Don't breed them if you can't feed them?
Do we have to feed anchor babies too?
Lol…that’s not remotely part of what he said. Try again.Translation:
The federal government has no responsibility in subsidizing the cost of child care, if you want handouts go elsewhere.
But he didn't say that. He said, eventually, he would tax imports and the $$ received from that will go, in part, to fixing the child care issue.Translation:
The federal government has no responsibility in subsidizing the cost of child care, if you want handouts go elsewhere.
oh is that what he said?Translation:
The federal government has no responsibility in subsidizing the cost of child care, if you want handouts go elsewhere.
Translation:
The federal government has no responsibility in subsidizing the cost of child care, if you want handouts go elsewhere.
you do understand one of the functions of government is to incentivize activities that increase productivity and revenue, much like a business. Think of subsidizing childcare like trickle up economics.Translation:
The federal government has no responsibility in subsidizing the cost of child care, if you want handouts go elsewhere.
you do understand one of the functions of government is to incentivize activities that increase productivity and revenue, much like a business. Think of subsidizing childcare like trickle up economics.
Translation:
The federal government has no responsibility in subsidizing the cost of child care, if you want handouts go elsewhere.
Thanks for clearing that up. At least someone speaks Moran on this board.
Translation:
The federal government has no responsibility in subsidizing the cost of child care, if you want handouts go elsewhere.
Which is why abortion should not be banned.Translation:
The federal government has no responsibility in subsidizing the cost of child care, if you want handouts go elsewhere.
Do you understand that what Trump is proposing will cause inflation?No,. that is not an understanding that I'm currently carrying in my repertoire.
And think about how many MAGA idiots nodded and smiled during Trump’s ridiculous, incoherent attempt at a response.That would have actually been a reasonable, easily defendable answer. No part of his incoherent babbling indicated that in any way. It was more like the rambling of an 8th grader who got called on to discuss Chapter 4 of the book that was assigned to read this week, who'd only read the title.
Play the tape.
MAGAts?? A little help? The best part is the applause at the end of that mosh pit of verbiage.
Translation:
The federal government has no responsibility in subsidizing the cost of child care, if you want handouts go elsewhere.
Scruddy is a perfect case in point.They don't care. They will change the subject, move the goal posts, etc. They only want their guy to win even if he's an old, lying, man without a plan.
Translation: "F**k if I know. SAN DEMAS HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL RULES!!!!"Play the tape.
MAGAts?? A little help? The best part is the applause at the end of that mosh pit of verbiage.
It looks like we just found the silent majority of Iowa Hawkeye fans who knew in their hearts Brian Ferentz was playing 4D chess on offense.Translation:
The federal government has no responsibility in subsidizing the cost of child care, if you want handouts go elsewhere.
It looks like we just found the silent majority of Iowa Hawkeye fans who knew in their hearts Brian Ferentz was playing 4D chess on offense.
He’s the student who gets called on and hasn’t done a bit of homework or studying.
But seriously, these are the kinds of sober, well-reasoned policy pronouncements we’re just not getting from Harris and Walz!
It's like he's a trained monkey that only has a few tricks!This is the type of Trump response I think of, and there are plenty of them, when folks say "Kamala is ignorant, she is stupid" but they don't bat an eye at Trump's idiotic nonsense. It fails to answer the question. It doesn't make sense from a QnA perspective. It doesn't follow basic economic rules and shows he has no understanding of how trade really works.
This is his level of ignorance on every topic, but she is the stupid one....
Translation:
The federal government has no responsibility in subsidizing the cost of child care, if you want handouts go elsewhere.