He does get to recommend "moving forward" based on evidence they find.
That is correct, but no authority to initiate charges,.. Glad to see you correcting your previously held erroneous position...
He does get to recommend "moving forward" based on evidence they find.
If the AG is shutting down his cases, you'd hear about it. Only, with Hunter Biden, you're hearing the OPPOSITE from the lead investigator - he has informed you explicitly that he is getting the support he needs.
And if DOJ is quashing his cases, he can tell Congress, and have a SC set up.That is correct, but no authority to initiate charges
The IRS "investigators" are peripheral players here.Too bad the IRS investigators aren't singing the same glowing praises...
And if DOJ is quashing his cases, he can tell Congress, and have a SC set up.
Which CAN occur at the request of Congress claiming a conflict of interest.Nope, initiation of a special counsel is also a function of the DOJ
Which CAN occur at the request of Congress claiming a conflict of interest.
Garland ALREADY approved the lead investigator for testimony before Congress.Funny,.. You do understand what the word "request" means right?,.. Let's see what Garland feels required to do
Judging from the comments coming out of Fulton County, it's going to be more reruns in a week or two.Did you notice-CNN and MSNBC are even showing reruns today of trump being indicted. Damn writers' strike!
It isn't just Trump, but I hate it when former office holders are referred to by the job they once held. Trump is not Mr. President. He's Donald John Trump at this point. Why would judge Cannon refer to him as former President Trump?
That’s pretty fast.
Hmm, Northern/Abby taking a break from HROT??
I want Biden and Harris gone.