I had some spare time last night, so I turned on CNN. Now I know why people on here are claiming she is a Russian asset.
Maybe Tulsi is “deceivingly athletic” like you think Josh Dix is. A good worker? Tries hard? A real lunch pale grinder?Hillary hates Tulsi,.. nuff said.
No, what keeps our allies from sharing information with us is regularly leaking classified information from within our intelligence apparatus to benefit our own enemy and a country that is at war with our best ally in the middle east, Israel.
Seems like a reputable source
Seems like a reputable source
Actually that pretty much confirms she isn't a Russian asset.
The left proves time and time again that they are incapable of learning lessons.
Lmfao the three worst possible sources you could have named. See comment above.How about three GOPers?
Mitt okay? Kinzinger? Bolton?
Kinzinger calls out Gabbard for Russian misinformation
Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) called out former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) on Sunday for “actual Russian propaganda” after the ex-congresswoman tweeted a video claiming that the U.S. is funding m…thehill.com
The left proves time and time again that they are incapable of learning lessons.
Lmfao the three worst possible sources you could have named. See comment above.
This much is undeniable. Like trump, whenever there's a choice, she always sides with mother russia.
I despise Debbie Wasserman Schultz for her role in rigging the 2016 primaries, but she is correct here. Tulsi aka Moscow Rose is most certainly a Russian asset
How do you decide when you believe news from Russia and when you don't?
How do you decide when you believe news from Russia and when you don't?
Fair enough.I believe this statement because it is consistent with her actions, like her secret meeting with Assad, and her repetition of pro-Russia propaganda.
I am not a Tulsi Gabbard expert...but I don't remember these serious concerns about her being expressed when she was a Dem primary candidate for POTUS. It would seem like if she really was a Russian dupe that one of the many fellow Dems would have called that out in 2019, no?
I believe this statement because it is consistent with her actions, like her secret meeting with Assad, and her repetition of pro-Russia propaganda.
You’re pissy because instead of shoveling arms to ISIS like Obama’s CIA did she wanted to spend that money on Americans?
Hillary first made the accusation publicly in October 2019, shortly after the fourth debate. Tulsi was polling at around 2%-3% and Hillary claimed the Russians were grooming her to run as a third party candidate to pull votes away from the eventual Democratic nominee.I am not a Tulsi Gabbard expert...but I don't remember these serious concerns about her being expressed when she was a Dem primary candidate for POTUS. It would seem like if she really was a Russian dupe that one of the many fellow Dems would have called that out in 2019, no?
Also, I suspect that Bernie ^^ would be more reliable here than the scorned Dems who don't like that she switched parties. FWIW.
I’m not saying she’s a Russian asset, but this is a terrible argument. Most Russian assets served in the military.
The best argument against it being true is that Hillary originated it.I’m not saying she’s a Russian asset, but this is a terrible argument. Most Russian assets served in the military.
Remember......this is the same party that was THRILLED to have Dick Chaney support Harris. LOL!!!The left proves time and time again that they are incapable of learning lessons.
Lmfao the three worst possible sources you could have named. See comment above.