BirdistheWord
HR Heisman
KF probably telling N.S. to keep his head in the game, keep practicing hard and will do everything he can to help the young man make it to NFL.
Update: Noah Shannon CLEARED TO PRACTICE. 26 UI student-athletes investigated for online gambling, incl in FB, Men’s BB, Baseball, T&F & Wrestling
- Thread starter Franisdaman
- Start date
Remember this, from October 10th, when Noah was cleared to practice, back on the roster, and would SOON be allowed to play?
That was 29 days ago!
That was 29 days ago!
Last edited:
If athletes shouldn’t gamble then gambling organizations shouldn’t be allowed to have commercials during broadcasts.
The NCAA and B1G are all about protecting the integrity of the game and showing care and compassion for it's amateur student-athletes.
For example, the B1G announced the US Integrity Partnership and Gameday Availability Report for the 2023 season.
Just like the pros have.
But for amateurs.
Lol....... Integrity? Lol... The only real use the "gameday availability report", is for use by gamblers. I'd love an explanation on how that is "showing care and compassion for its student athletes" It has nothing to do with that whatsoever.....
Hypothetically, let’s say we meet Michigan in the CCG. And during that time the NCAA still hasn’t cleared Shannon to play and hasn’t handed out any punishment to Michigan. I say play him. If they try to punish Iowa for it you’ve just exposed how much of a bias there really is within the NCAA. Then we sit back and watch it all burn to the ground…🍿
Governance 11/8/2023
5:46:00 PM
Meghan Durham Wright
DI approves modifications to wagering-related reinstatement guidelines
Changes apply to cases in which sudent-athletes placed bets on other teams at their schools________________________________________________________________
The Division I Council Coordination Committee on Wednesday adjusted the guidelines for student-athlete reinstatement cases in which student-athletes wager on other teams at their own schools. An adjustment to reinstatement guidelines was requested by the Conference Commissioners Association in early October and was supported in concept by the Division I Council at its Oct. 4 meeting.
Effective immediately, reinstatement guidelines for student-athletes who wager on teams at their school — excluding their own team — will start at requiring one season of ineligibility and a loss of one year of eligibility. Student-athletes will also be required to participate in sports wagering rules and prevention education as a condition of reinstatement. Previous guidelines, as approved in June, prescribed permanent ineligibility for those cases. The adjusted guidelines may be applied to cases in which student-athletes are currently serving suspensions related to wagering on a different team at their own school that were reported on or after May 2, 2023.
"To be clear, Division I members do not encourage student-athletes to engage in sports wagering at any level, and the actions today to modify reinstatement conditions should not be interpreted as support for wagering behaviors," said Jon Steinbrecher, chair of the Council Coordination Committee and commissioner of the Mid-American Conference. "NCAA members continue to prioritize integrity of competition and felt that reinstatement conditions for violations of wagering rules should reflect that focus and, when possible, also accommodate opportunities for preventative education."
The adjustment to reinstatement guidelines is the first step in membership action to review NCAA rules around sports wagering more broadly. Under current NCAA rules, it remains impermissible for student-athletes, coaches and athletics administrators to engage in sports wagering in any sport sponsored by the NCAA, including collegiate and professional sports.
"The council agreed with Division I commissioners that the reinstatement conditions for wagering violations in limited circumstances should be adjusted," Steinbrecher said. "Member schools need to fully examine NCAA wagering legislation overall — particularly in light of changes in recent years to federal and state laws — but the council agreed that additional changes should not be made until potential changes to rules are contemplated."
DI approves modifications to wagering-related reinstatement guidelines - NCAA.org
The Division I Council Coordination Committee on Wednesday adjusted the guidelines for student-athlete reinstatement cases in which student-athletes wager on other
www.ncaa.org
Governance 11/8/2023
5:46:00 PM
Meghan Durham Wright
DI approves modifications to wagering-related reinstatement guidelines
Changes apply to cases in which sudent-athletes placed bets on other teams at their schools
________________________________________________________________
The Division I Council Coordination Committee on Wednesday adjusted the guidelines for student-athlete reinstatement cases in which student-athletes wager on other teams at their own schools. An adjustment to reinstatement guidelines was requested by the Conference Commissioners Association in early October and was supported in concept by the Division I Council at its Oct. 4 meeting.
Effective immediately, reinstatement guidelines for student-athletes who wager on teams at their school — excluding their own team — will start at requiring one season of ineligibility and a loss of one year of eligibility. Student-athletes will also be required to participate in sports wagering rules and prevention education as a condition of reinstatement. Previous guidelines, as approved in June, prescribed permanent ineligibility for those cases. The adjusted guidelines may be applied to cases in which student-athletes are currently serving suspensions related to wagering on a different team at their own school that were reported on or after May 2, 2023.
"To be clear, Division I members do not encourage student-athletes to engage in sports wagering at any level, and the actions today to modify reinstatement conditions should not be interpreted as support for wagering behaviors," said Jon Steinbrecher, chair of the Council Coordination Committee and commissioner of the Mid-American Conference. "NCAA members continue to prioritize integrity of competition and felt that reinstatement conditions for violations of wagering rules should reflect that focus and, when possible, also accommodate opportunities for preventative education."
The adjustment to reinstatement guidelines is the first step in membership action to review NCAA rules around sports wagering more broadly. Under current NCAA rules, it remains impermissible for student-athletes, coaches and athletics administrators to engage in sports wagering in any sport sponsored by the NCAA, including collegiate and professional sports.
"The council agreed with Division I commissioners that the reinstatement conditions for wagering violations in limited circumstances should be adjusted," Steinbrecher said. "Member schools need to fully examine NCAA wagering legislation overall — particularly in light of changes in recent years to federal and state laws — but the council agreed that additional changes should not be made until potential changes to rules are contemplated."
DI approves modifications to wagering-related reinstatement guidelines - NCAA.org
The Division I Council Coordination Committee on Wednesday adjusted the guidelines for student-athlete reinstatement cases in which student-athletes wager on other
I'm confused................doesn't this mean he can't come back???
Effective immediately, reinstatement guidelines for student-athletes who wager on teams at their school — excluding their own team — will start at requiring one season of ineligibility and a loss of one year of eligibility. Student-athletes will also be required to participate in sports wagering rules and prevention education as a condition of reinstatement. Previous guidelines, as approved in June, prescribed permanent ineligibility for those cases. The adjusted guidelines may be applied to cases in which student-athletes are currently serving suspensions related to wagering on a different team at their own school that were reported on or after May 2, 2023.
yep, looks like Noah's next real game won't happen until next year, in the NFL
Did he bet on an Iowa team for sure? Just strange they let him come back and practice before this.
And I will be waiting on the Mighty NCAA to come down hard on old Jimbo.
He's done. 1 year suspension and loss of that year of eligibility.
Don't quote me on this, but I think Noah placed a bet on the women's basketball team
Note that today's decision affects 6 Iowa wrestlers, too. They were ranked #2 in the nation; that will change dramatically.
Would have been nice if there was some $ threshhold on the total bets.
Also I can't wait for the other 49 states to jump right in and do a thorough review of betting by athletes in their states.
Also I can't wait for the other 49 states to jump right in and do a thorough review of betting by athletes in their states.
Can you imagine if it was like one $50 bet or some crap like that!
Great work NCAA.... You took all that time to come back with the same IDIOTIC conclusion.
Causes gambling on sports you have nothing to do with REALLY affects the integrity of the game. LOL
Keep letting the Bluebloods have fake classes and bringing guns to murder scenes.
Causes gambling on sports you have nothing to do with REALLY affects the integrity of the game. LOL
Keep letting the Bluebloods have fake classes and bringing guns to murder scenes.
We shall punish the NCAA by winning with even fewer points and fewer yards!
Questions????
Can a one-year suspended student athlete use the suspended season as a red shirt & then play the following season; providing the player hasn't already used a red shirt?
Or, if the suspension denied the player his pandemic extra eligibility, can that be used after the suspension year?
Hmmmm, IDK the answers 🤔.
Can a one-year suspended student athlete use the suspended season as a red shirt & then play the following season; providing the player hasn't already used a red shirt?
Or, if the suspension denied the player his pandemic extra eligibility, can that be used after the suspension year?
Hmmmm, IDK the answers 🤔.
Imagine placing a legal bet as a legal ADULT on a sport unrelated to the sport you you play and being suspended for a year. Makes zero sense... Like everything else that the NCAA FAILS at.
Jimbo has recruiting violations and sits a few games against cream puffs.
This really pisses me off
Jimbo has recruiting violations and sits a few games against cream puffs.
This really pisses me off
An Iowa football player is just as likely to have friends on other college teams and have access to info on those teams to place a bet, but no we will punish the hell out of a guy for placing a bet on Iowa's women's team.
Noah's inside info on Iowa women's basketball was that Caitlyn Clark is good!!!! Lol.
The NCAA can eat shit.
This is a simple way to look at it:
A year of eligibility granted is a year of eligibility. A redshirt is not a year of eligibility used (hence, 5 years to completed 4 years of eligibility).
The NCAA added a fifth year of eligibility to all athletes as a result of Covid, so that expanded things to 6 years to finish 5 years of eligibility.
The redshirt is not eligibility. And the Covid rule granted an extra year.
It remains 6 for 5 for those enrolled and impacted during Covid.
This announcement states the athlete lose one of those eligibility years.
I'm submitting to my employer that I placed bets on the Iowa Women (had a friend in Iowa City that said Caitlin was good). I'll fall on the "suspended with pay" sword. And come back from suspension a better man.
The full text of the tweet:
Looks to be bad news, as Kirk Ferentz feared, for Noah Shannon.
Iowa wrestlers, too.
Per NCAA guidelines released moments ago,
"Effective immediately, reinstatement guidelines for student-athletes who wager on teams at their school — excluding their own team — will start at requiring one season of ineligibility and a loss of one year of eligibility."
Looks to be bad news, as Kirk Ferentz feared, for Noah Shannon.
Iowa wrestlers, too.
Per NCAA guidelines released moments ago,
"Effective immediately, reinstatement guidelines for student-athletes who wager on teams at their school — excluding their own team — will start at requiring one season of ineligibility and a loss of one year of eligibility."
If it was WBB, I would simply inquire as to the circumstances and results of the game he bet on. If he had inside information and there were injuries, etc., and the women lost that would be a thing.
Highly doubt that was the situation.
We've known since Drew Ott the NCAA hates us.
Similar threads
