Need to seriously look at St Joseph's Laura Zeigler. Danish 6-3 forward.
She is already a HawkNeed to seriously look at St Joseph's Laura Zeigler. Danish 6-3 forward.
Not close enough. AJ Ediger was a Hawkeye since middle school.She is already a Hawk
St Joseph Hawk
Maybe an Iowa Hawk soon?
My mistake only 6-2.Need to seriously look at St Joseph's Laura Zeigler. Danish 6-3 forward.
Agree as I think CM is toxic and just an all-around dip****, but JMO.![]()
Don’t need that drama on the team. Players like her can be a cancer.
Stating the obvious, but that Tweet pretty clearly puts the Mallegni might transfer rumor to rest. At least until we see what Iowa does in the portal.
I really expect that Deal will handle that job. Look, I'm not saying that she'll be CC22, But she has much the same skill set, and stood out against better comp then CC played against in high school. Not saying she's going to lead the nation in scoring at 27 a game, and be first team AA, but literally nothing would surprise me. The girl has that pedigree. Jan already has a road map on how to handle that level of talent. For all that CC22 brought to the table she was also a bit of a loose cannon early on, and took some molding. From what I've seen of Deal, she's much more centered, and less likely to need all the "counciling" it took to teach Clark how to deal with how to play with others around her that didn't see the game at her level. I'd agree that Guyton is not ready to be the point guard. I'd see her more off the ball as a scorer with less pressure on her to run the offense. Frankly I'd like to see more of just what last years Miss Iowa basketball has up her sleeve. In the few minutes we've seen Levin play, she seems to be an excellent passer and decent athlete. Regardless, Jan will do what she thinks best, ad we'll all get to arm chair QB her decisions after the fact with the benefit of hindsight.Being an instant starter as a freshman is challenging.
Being an instant starter as a pg doubles the pressure.
I think JJ absolutely needs to bring in a portal pg, otherwise you're expecting Guyton to suddenly become an effective pg, which seems wishful thinking right now.
JJ doesn't have the luxury of waiting to see if AG develops over the summer.
Being an instant starter as a freshman is challenging.
Being an instant starter as a pg doubles the pressure.
I think JJ absolutely needs to bring in a portal pg, otherwise you're expecting Guyton to suddenly become an effective pg, which seems wishful thinking right now.
JJ doesn't have the luxury of waiting to see if AG develops over the summer.
I don't know, but I sure liked her being more aggressive shooting recently.Is Stremlow athletic enough to be effective against top teams???
Not a criticism, just asking.
Stating the obvious, but that Tweet pretty clearly puts the Mallegni might transfer rumor to rest. At least until we see what Iowa does in the portal.
Top 3Saw Cotie McMahon entered the portal. Definitely looking for $$$$. PP attitude.
Top 3
Iowa
Maryland
Tennessee
Those are her rivals. So it was a joke 😉Whose top 3, yours or Cotie's? I'd bet she's not on Jan's list.
Those are her rivals. So it was a joke 😉
Damn - was looking forward to seeing Cotie at Carver-Hawkeye next year flipping Hawk fans her patented "bird"!Saw Cotie McMahon entered the portal. Definitely looking for $$$$. PP attitude.
You have a lot more confidence in Guyton than I do. Out of control all the time....Jan will try to add 2 more pieces out of the portal where we "don't have a lot of depth."
She says:
"My model will always be to try to develop but like we're graduating Syd at forward and we don't have a lot of depth at the one, right."
"I love our freshmen and I love the incomers and if we can just get a couple portal pieces I think could' be really fun."
She specifically targets a #1 (PG) and the other position inferred is Syd's position for graduating.
Now whether they find a replacement starter or a backup (with potential to start) that's another question and it could also depend on how the bidding war pans out if we get one or both.
Now here's what I expect on game day #1:
1) Deal fully capable to be PG if no portal PG is picked up.
2) Guyton fully capable to be PG if no portal PG is picked up.
3) Stremlow fully capable to be PG if no portal PG is picked up.
4) Portal PG fully capable to be PG if they can get one.
Now here's where the plan deviates. If Jan gets a PG out of the portal and depending on that new player's skills, I will change the skills focus I develop for either Deal, Guyton and Stremlow to somewhere else. This somewhere else also depends on a 2nd portal pickup (most likely a stretch 3/4) and their strengths and weaknesses.
Because you're working from the portal, you may not get your #1 PG or your #2 PG. You may end up with your #3 PG from the portal. All 3 of these portal PGs have their own set of strengths and weaknesses. Depending on the strengths they exhibit better than Deal, Guyton and Stremlow, I will peel one of these 3 current '25 players off of PG to concentrate on another position.
It looks like Teagan is coming back so that's good news. I really hope her off-season development calms her down a bit so she can work her magic on the court like she has in game warmups.
All the time?? lol. Cut her some slack dude...She's a freshman and due to her injury wasn't able to practice or get into playing shape until later in the season. I remember when Monica was a freshman and she couldn't even catch a post feed. So if she is "out of control all the time" next year than I might agree but geez the basketball scouts on these message boards need to cool their jets for a minute.You have a lot more confidence in Guyton than I do. Out of control all the time....
Thanks for letting us all know that you know zero about bball with such a stupid commentYou have a lot more confidence in Guyton than I do. Out of control all the time....
Not only that, but her court awareness and decision making to me looked really good for a freshmanI don't know, but I sure liked her being more aggressive shooting recently.
You must be talking about @cmhawks99......& I completely agree!Agree as I think CM is toxic and just an all-around dip****, but JMO.
This is who we need!
Some of you need to chill out defending Guyton. Maybe she'll become a good PG, but she's not there yet.Thanks for letting us all know that you know zero about bball with such a stupid comment
I think she's a head case.This is who we need!
Why?
It's as I was always told " Be careful of what you wish for".I really hate what this era is becoming. Open free agency will be the end for all college athletics.
Sometimes people don't respond because they ignored your posts because people freely choosing certain buzz words primarily used by very specific contemporary social/political circles generally don't have much in the way of meaningful contributions to the discourse. Hint hint don't waste your time responding to this oneYou must be talking about @cmhawks99......& I completely agree!
Call him out all you want, because he's too chickensh!t to respond......plus cucks prefer to stay quiet in their dark corner.
Guard rails are coming... eventually? Well, at the latest, when the next iteration of the NCAA or enforcement body is realized. I hope it's one of those things that's the hot topic behind closed doors, and so it will materialize quickly once the wheels start. The universities are most incentivized to come together on this vs not. Any perceived competitive advantages are outweighed by establishing a transparent market and decreasing the money being siphoned to anyone other than the athlete and the universities. I would think after the first year of revenue sharing, progress should start moving along again, right? Does it have to wait until the next round of conference realignment?It's as I was always told " Be careful of what you wish for".
What the f^ck are you even saying........is that english?!Sometimes people don't respond because they ignored your posts because people freely choosing certain buzz words primarily used by very specific contemporary social/political circles generally don't have much in the way of meaningful contributions to the discourse. Hint hint don't waste your time responding to this one