ADVERTISEMENT

We let Tom Davis go for making it to the sweet 16

Great recruiter, lousy bench coach.
I thought he was too much of a philosopher with the team. I don't know if it was before the drill or after, the players would have to go over and get their notebooks to take notes and there was some other things he did that was just different.
 
Way, way better, huh?

Tom Davis inherited great players from George Raveling. Tom had Roy Marble, BJ Armstrong and Ed Horton for 3 years. Tom Davis also had Kevin Gamble for the Elite 8 run in his first season as head coach. Fran, in comparison, inherited a cratered out program from Lick. That's why Fran went 11-20 and 18-17 in his first 2 years at Iowa.

Here are their records at Iowa when you take out the first 2 years (where Tom benefited from George Raveling's great recruits & Fran suffered with Lick's recruits):

232-139 (.625): Fran
215-125 (.632): Tom

As everyone can see, they both won 63% of their games. Does this look like Tom did way, way better to anyone else?
Everybody that fancies themselves a basketball savant always want to delete the first two years of the Tom Davis era when they want to minimize him. I ask you - who was coaching during those two years? George's ghost? Or did the players coach themselves?
 
Everybody that fancies themselves a basketball savant always want to delete the first two years of the Tom Davis era when they want to minimize him. I ask you - who was coaching during those two years? George's ghost? Or did the players coach themselves?
I agree. Also.....why didn't George have success with those very same players?
 
  • Like
Reactions: kceasthawk
Everybody that fancies themselves a basketball savant always want to delete the first two years of the Tom Davis era when they want to minimize him. I ask you - who was coaching during those two years? George's ghost? Or did the players coach themselves?
Agreed…it’s also hard to compare eras anyway.
 
I thought he was too much of a philosopher with the team. I don't know if it was before the drill or after, the players would have to go over and get their notebooks to take notes and there was some other things he did that was just different.
Yeah, George was/is an interesting cat to be sure. Very unique individual with quite a mind.
 
he would have been fired before the Sweet Sixteen season but Bowlsby was blocked. So the streak could be longer.
 
loved davis, but in his first season he single-handedly cost us a final 4 by slowing down the game in the 2nd half with a 19-pt lead. went against everything they stood for all season long. there were something like 6 future pros on that team. never got close to that team since

Unlv also changed their defense in the second half.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BonzoFury
The administration let Davis go before the season that he reached the Sweet 16 with. It was his swan song and likely a big reason he made it that final year. If he'd been retained, who knows where they would've finished that year because they weren't a great team. They were a normal-good team he would usually bow out in the second round with.
 
The administration let Davis go before the season that he reached the Sweet 16 with. It was his swan song and likely a big reason he made it that final year. If he'd been retained, who knows where they would've finished that year because they weren't a great team. They were a normal-good team he would usually bow out in the second round with.
I also remember that Sam Okey had transferred to Iowa from Wisconsin and was eligible to start playing when the 2nd semester started. Had Davis been retained, Okey likely would have sat that 2nd half of the year and retained a full season of eligibility, but he opted to play for Davis while he could.
 
And we haven't been back since. Their must of been some big time donors that wanted coach Davis out because we haven't been the same since he left. I will support the hawks and coach Fran but with the new age portal you can build a good team in a few days and he better hit the portal heavy.

Dr Tom was a lame duck coach the whole season as it was made public that they were not looking to renew his contract. It was a terrible look by Bowlsby. Several things were going on at that time with the Dr's team as he was not getting the big time Iowa recruits, 3 of them that went to play at Kansas iirc. Dr Tom was rumored to not go see their high school games that much or even to the boys state tourney, which is something he would be expected to do. So the recruiting was down and there were misses, Bowlsby was scheduling a weaker non-conf home schedule and attendance was down but it was not Dr Tom and his teams fault.

Anyway, Dr Tom held his head high and his last team had that incredible early season win at Kansas to break KU's long non-conf home winning streak. and then they made the sweet 16.
 
Everybody that fancies themselves a basketball savant always want to delete the first two years of the Tom Davis era when they want to minimize him. I ask you - who was coaching during those two years? George's ghost? Or did the players coach themselves?

I agree. Also.....why didn't George have success with those very same players?

Agreed…it’s also hard to compare eras anyway.


It is fair to remove the first 2 years of the Tom Davis era based on the incredible talent he inherited from George Raveling (which Tom NEVER CAME CLOSE to ever recruiting himself). And it's also fair to remove the first 2 years of the Fran era based on the shit talent & cratered out program that he inherited from Todd Lickliter.

This way we are looking at the last 11 years for both Tom & Fran and we have an apples to apples comparison. Both won 63% of their games.

Coaching Record over their last 11 years:
232-139 (.625): Fran
215-125 (.632): Tom

NCAA Tournament Appearances in their last 11 years:
8: Fran (including 2020, canceled by covid pandemic)
7: Tom Davis
 
It is fair to remove the first 2 years of the Tom Davis era based on the incredible talent he inherited from George Raveling (which Tom NEVER CAME CLOSE to ever recruiting himself). And it's also fair to remove the first 2 years of the Fran era based on the shit talent & cratered out program that he inherited from Todd Lickliter.

This way we are looking at the last 11 years for both Tom & Fran and we have an apples to apples comparison. Both won 63% of their games.

Coaching Record over their last 11 years:
232-139 (.625): Fran
215-125 (.632): Tom

NCAA Tournament Appearances in their last 11 years:
8: Fran (including 2020, canceled by covid pandemic)
7: Tom Davis
You need to add total NCAA wins over that time period

Tom Davis - 8
Fran - 4
 
  • Like
Reactions: AEG82
And we haven't been back since. Their must of been some big time donors that wanted coach Davis out because we haven't been the same since he left. I will support the hawks and coach Fran but with the new age portal you can build a good team in a few days and he better hit the portal heavy.
Not hardly. Davis was headed out the door long before the tourney even started and he knew it. One could make the argument that his players rallied for him to possibly keep his job, but his forced exile had nothing to do with the tournament or its outcome.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: AEG82
Everybody that fancies themselves a basketball savant always want to delete the first two years of the Tom Davis era when they want to minimize him. I ask you - who was coaching during those two years? George's ghost? Or did the players coach themselves?
In the same way people point to KF's being around 60% winning. If you take out those first two years resurecting where we had fallen and the subsequent 4-20 record what would his % be?
 
Dr Tom had retired on the job. Non conference road games were scheduled based on where Tom could golf. And he stopped recruiting. Recruit Gomez was the last straw for bowlsby,
 
Dr Tom had retired on the job. Non conference road games were scheduled based on where Tom could golf. And he stopped recruiting. Recruit Gomez was the last straw for bowlsby,
I know Davis was tired of recruiting but what were his assistants doing? Davis wasn't the lead recruiter and every player. Davis has to be there to finish the deal though.
 
I’ve always been a huge Davis guy and that was my favorite era of Iowa hoops in my lifetime (only remember the Lute years after the FF), with Fran’s time 2nd…but let’s not oversell the Davis era. They weren’t making the 2nd weekend every 3-4 years. Dr. Tom’s first two teams went to the 2nd weekend and then 11 years later, they made it one more time.

There were some extenuating circumstances in there - Hunter Rawlings declaring Ray Thompson academically ineligible despite meeting NCAA and B1G standards and then obviously the tragic death of Chris Street. I especially think that 1992-1993 team with Street, Earl and Barnes would have made a lot of noise in the tournament, that trio would have been tough to match up with.
I didn’t mean Davis took the team to the sweet 16 every 3-4 years. I was responding to a post that said at this point they would take a first round win. I meant going to the sweet 16 every 3-4 years would meet my goals as a fan. A final four or elite 8 would be nice once a decade as well.
 
I didn’t mean Davis took the team to the sweet 16 every 3-4 years. I was responding to a post that said at this point they would take a first round win. I meant going to the sweet 16 every 3-4 years would meet my goals as a fan. A final four or elite 8 would be nice once a decade as well.
Ah, fair. Sorry for the mix-up. I’d love all that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawksbyamillion
And we haven't been back since. Their must of been some big time donors that wanted coach Davis out because we haven't been the same since he left. I will support the hawks and coach Fran but with the new age portal you can build a good team in a few days and he better hit the portal heavy.
Tom likes to golf more than recruit. He lost the three Iowa boys to Kansas that would of changed the course of history for Iowa basketball.
 
Tom likes to golf more than recruit. He lost the three Iowa boys to Kansas that would of changed the course of history for Iowa basketball.
Is the story true that he once wouldn't leave the golf course to meet with a recruit?
 
Tom likes to golf more than recruit. He lost the three Iowa boys to Kansas that would of changed the course of history for Iowa basketball.
Not exactly.

He failed to get Lafrentz which was really tough for people to swallow because something like that had never happened before.

Heinrich was an isu fan as I understand it and was going there but Floyd left for the bulls.

Collison was going to come to Iowa but Davis was not renewed.

In retrospect, keeping Davis just to get Collison would probably have been worth it.

The further away it gets the more you realize what a pivotal event Chris Streets death was. That changed the trajectory of the program.
 
I am in my early 40s and I have just come to accept I will not see another Iowa Sweet Sixteen in my lifetime
Fran and Barta should be gone within 10 years, until then we're probably spinning our wheels going nowhere.
 
Not exactly.

He failed to get Lafrentz which was really tough for people to swallow because something like that had never happened before.

Heinrich was an isu fan as I understand it and was going there but Floyd left for the bulls.

Collison was going to come to Iowa but Davis was not renewed.

In retrospect, keeping Davis just to get Collison would probably have been worth it.

The further away it gets the more you realize what a pivotal event Chris Streets death was. That changed the trajectory of the program.

Correct. Collison was the only one IOWA had a chance on. LaFrentz has been a KU fan for years. Heinrich was clone-bound as you said.
I have a childhood friend who worked in the basketball office for years. She's told me that Street's death was a gut punch for Dr. Tom that he never really recovered from.
 
Posted this in the Jack McCaffrey thread…


I feel Fran is a top 40 coach. Just like Tom Davis was before he was shown the door. After a while, lack of any quantifiable success in late March is relevant.
 
If Bowlsby and the UI had simply paid out Dr. Tom the measly buyout for the last year, he would have been gone after 1998, when a lot of people were ready for change after an early NIT exit. That would have given the new coach a better more experienced team to inherit as well and it likely would not have been Alford at that point.

It boils down to one very very very pennywise, pound foolish decision by Bowlsby and the UI.
It was Bowlesby who fired Davis and he fully was prepared to pay him off. It was Davis who went to Sue, the President of the University and begged to be allowed to finish his contract and that would save to University the cost of the buyout. She, overruled Bowlesby and Davis stayed he didn't bother to recruit because no one knew who the new coach would be. Iowa should have hired Davis's replacement as an assistant like what Purdue did with announcing Him being Keady's replacement. Davis philosophy was to schedule as weak a schedule as possible, win half of his conference games and go to the NCAA. The NCAA clamped down on that and began to take SOS into consideration. Bowlesby ordered Davis to improve the schedule and Davis refused which cost us at least 1, probably 2, NCAA invitations. That act of insubordination was Bowlesby's last straw. Davis was a passive aggressive asshat. He stood by and allowed Rucker's NCAA paperwork to go unfiled costing Guy his final year of eligibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimbob22
It was Bowlesby who fired Davis and he fully was prepared to pay him off. It was Davis who went to Sue, the President of the University and begged to be allowed to finish his contract and that would save to University the cost of the buyout. She, overruled Bowlesby and Davis stayed he didn't bother to recruit because no one knew who the new coach would be. Iowa should have hired Davis's replacement as an assistant like what Purdue did with announcing Him being Keady's replacement. Davis philosophy was to schedule as weak a schedule as possible, win half of his conference games and go to the NCAA. The NCAA clamped down on that and began to take SOS into consideration. Bowlesby ordered Davis to improve the schedule and Davis refused which cost us at least 1, probably 2, NCAA invitations. That act of insubordination was Bowlesby's last straw. Davis was a passive aggressive asshat. He stood by and allowed Rucker's NCAA paperwork to go unfiled costing Guy his final year of eligibility.

Why would Mary Sue Coleman do that? I struggle with that.
 
troutstamp1 said:
but with the new age portal you can build a good team in a few days..

But this is Iowa. Recruits aren’t exactly standing at the door to play for the Hawks. You have to look at Iowa realistically and objectively. We will continue to get some good recruits, but it will get harder and harder to compete with the top programs. I think you are going to see wider separation between the big boys and the rest of us. And, Iowa is in the “rest of us” group. You need to have a coaching staff that is extremely aggressive as far as recruiting is concerned to have a chance of having a very good team year to year. Not happening at Iowa…at least in the present situation.
Doesn't appear to be a problem with ISU recruiting to Lames. What they do have is a tremendous home court. The dumb asses are content to let Carver be a half filled morgue.
 
Not exactly.

He failed to get Lafrentz which was really tough for people to swallow because something like that had never happened before.

Heinrich was an isu fan as I understand it and was going there but Floyd left for the bulls.

Collison was going to come to Iowa but Davis was not renewed.

In retrospect, keeping Davis just to get Collison would probably have been worth it.

The further away it gets the more you realize what a pivotal event Chris Streets death was. That changed the trajectory of the program.
Yeah,that was just a horrible event that has haunted this program.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT