Yeah but he's not some right winger. He's the Dems own impeachment witness LOL.So what? It's still nothing but his opinion.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah but he's not some right winger. He's the Dems own impeachment witness LOL.So what? It's still nothing but his opinion.
Who said that Trump committed impeachable offenses. So, do you believe that opinion as well?Yeah but he's not some right winger. He's the Dems own impeachment witness LOL.
For exposing Joe Biden's corruption in Ukraine? Nah, I don't think that's impeachable.Who said that Trump committed impeachable offenses. So, do you believe that opinion as well?
So you only selectively agree when it fits your agenda. Got it.For exposing Joe Biden's corruption in Ukraine? Nah, I don't think that's impeachable.
Yeah I can think for myself.So you only selectively agree when it fits your agenda. Got it.
You just called Noah Feldman a "right winger" becuase you didn't like his opinion LOL.Obviously not.
I didn't say that I didn't like his opinion. As a matter of fact, I originally asked YOU to provide Constitutional evidence to support YOUR position and YOU credited Feldman for your opinion. That's some fine thinking for yourself right there.You just called Noah Feldman a "right winger" becuase you didn't like his opinion LOL.
Pretty obvious yet totally ignored by the propaganda outlets of corporate media.
Maybe if the Dems own impeachment witness didn't contradict their own impeachment narrative we wouldn't be having all this confusion.I didn't say that I didn't like his opinion. As a matter of fact, I originally asked YOU to provide Constitutional evidence to support YOUR position and YOU credited Feldman for your opinion. That's some fine thinking for yourself right there.
Uhhh, Noah Feldman was a star impeachment witness for the Dems you doofus.
We are just exposing you to facts and reality. It may be like sunlight to a vampire but it isn’t trolling.Amazing how many right wing trolls show up in threads like these.
In the end, we're just arguing semantics. Nancy will most likely never send it to the Senate because she knows the evidence is a complete farce and Biden would be exposed as the trial boomerangs back on Burisma and Hunter.He was, but I don't think he has much support for (in the Constitution or among other Constitutional scholars) the position that a president isn't impeached until the articles of impeachment are sent to the Senate. There is nothing in the Constitution that requires that, just like there is nothing in the Constitution that requires Managers from the House to be named. Constitutionally, Trump is impeached and the Senate could start a trial any time they want.
The evidence keeps piling up against Trump.In the end, we're just arguing semantics. Nancy will most likely never send it to the Senate because she knows the evidence is a complete farce and Biden would be exposed as the trial boomerangs back on Burisma and Hunter.
Did you want to debate or contradict some thing in the tweet? Of course not so you’re reduced to cute one liners. All that the Left can do is attack the messenger because the message is factual.It’s midnight in Moscow comrade. Have another shot of vodka and hit the sack.
In the end, we're just arguing semantics. Nancy will most likely never send it to the Senate because she knows the evidence is a complete farce and Biden would be exposed as the trial boomerangs back on Burisma and Hunter.
Mitch is a snake just like the rest of Congress. Everyone's hand is in the cookie jar. Ukraine and Biden is only the surface. No one wants a Senate trial except Trump.Quite possibly true. There is a school of thought that Feldman said what he said to try to give Nancy some leverage over the Senate when she has none, but there is no constitutional support for this position. The problem is, Mitch is happy to play along with that game and just not have a trial until he views it as politically favorable timing, if ever. If Mitch believed having a trial right now would be beneficial, he would be having a trial right now without Nancy ever sending the articles of impeachment.
This is the correct answer. A trial is beneficial to none of the career politicians and potentially catastrophic to many.Mitch is a snake just like the rest of Congress. Everyone's hand is in the cookie jar. Ukraine and Biden is only the surface. No one wants a Senate trial except Trump.
Did you want to debate or contradict some thing in the tweet? Of course not so you’re reduced to cute one liners. All that the Left can do is attack the messenger because the message is factual.
You still a Russia conspiracy theorist? That was thoroughly debunked some time back bro. Has anyone told you that Iran and Russia are allies? Spend the next few hours reconciling that in your little mind.
That explains Trumps recent call to Putin...he had to get permission for the air strike without pissing off Russia.Did you want to debate or contradict some thing in the tweet? Of course not so you’re reduced to cute one liners. All that the Left can do is attack the messenger because the message is factual.
You still a Russia conspiracy theorist? That was thoroughly debunked some time back bro. Has anyone told you that Iran and Russia are allies? Spend the next few hours reconciling that in your little mind.
Mitch is a snake just like the rest of Congress. Everyone's hand is in the cookie jar. Ukraine and Biden is only the surface. No one wants a Senate trial except Trump.
Did he have to get permission when he vaporized hundreds of Russian mercenaries in Syria last year?That explains Trumps recent call to Putin...he had to get permission for the air strike without pissing off Russia.
Your English is good comrade. As you know, the money returned was actually Iranian money. The Obama Administration was engaged in an effort to prevent Iranian nuclearization. That’s over now, as is any prospect for peace in the Middle East.
That's definitely the play for Nancy. Attempt to frame anything outside of Trump as a distraction from the REAL (fake) investigation.I think many Democrats want a trial limited to Trump's actions only. What they don't want is a trial with a broader scope. The articles of impeachment were passed/adopted, so there is going to be a trial eventually whether people want it or not.
So a right wing lawyer's word is gospel but one who leans left is infected with TDS? I would ask if you realize how stupid you sound but I already know the answer.
Trump has to run everything by Putin. Putin has those photos of Trump getting pissed on by Russian hookers. Don’t want to make Melania any madder than she is.Did he have to get permission when he vaporized hundreds of Russian mercenaries in Syria last year?
Ahh yes. The ole fake Russian piss dossier concocted by Christopher Steele and Fusion GPS which was presented to the FISA court as evidence to illegally spy on a Presidential candidate. Good times. Treasonous times, but good.Trump has to run everything by Putin. Putin has those photos of Trump getting pissed on by Russian hookers. Don’t want to make Melania any madder than she is.
Spreading fake news. Soldiers are Ukrainian.
Regardless of the video 200 Russian mercenaries were killed by the US in Syria. Care to explain?Spreading fake news. Soldiers are Ukrainian.
Hey dipstick, do you remember when the US killed the legitimate, elected leader of Iran?No, you have people that appreciate that despots, fuhrers, and tyrants shouldn't be allowed to openly attack American interests and put our country at risk. A terrible man was killed tonight, and the leftist on these boards are on the attack of our leadership. It's sickening.
do you remember when the US killed the legitimate, elected leader of Iran?
Your disrespect for our troops is repulsive.
Circa 1954, the CIA helped to reinstall the Shah, by taking out Mosaddegh. Resa Pahlavi was the Shah taken out of power during the revolution in 1979, when we had embassy personnel takehttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27étatn hostage.I don't remember that. Who was an elected leader?
How about you, tough guy? Ever serve in the military?Why do you keep asking him this?
He isn’t duty bound to divulge his background to you or any other person on this board.
Circa 1954, the CIA helped to reinstall the Shah, by taking out Mosaddegh. Resa Pahlavi was the Shah taken out of power during the revolution in 1979, when we had embassy personnel takehttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27étatn hostage.
The 1953 Iranian coup d'état, known in Iran as the 28 Mordad coup d'état (Persian: کودتای ۲۸ مرداد), was the overthrow of the democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh in favour of strengthening the monarchical rule of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi on 19 August 1953,[5] orchestrated by the United States (under the name TPAJAX Project[6] or "Operation Ajax") and the United Kingdom (under the name "Operation Boot").[7][8][9][10] It was the first covert action of the United States to overthrow a foreign government during peacetime.[11]
The Iranian people just want to live their lives, like people everywhere. They are not strongly behind the leadership...Only people not upset are the Iranian people.