I have a few thoughts but one that keeps coming up is $ and the constant nudges in every thread that alludes to, you want improvement—donate, but who is the steward of those dollars?
I donated to HWC and realized some decisions were a bit frustrating. For years the club was non existent including the last Olympic team trials, the pinnacle of the sport. For example, how long was Sam Stoll rostered? Never competed, how many donations covered his expense? Then we signed Glynn and Moody on, who with all due respect, probably were not the direction. Now we transitioned to a graduating class in which Marinelli has a ceiling, DeSanto could be a factor but also needs to be a 57, Eierman who knows but MMA imminent? Kemmerer was a keeper. Summarizing the better part of a decade where we need more $ but who invested the old $ for those 10 years and chose the club expenditures? Because it seems like personal favorites stick around as a priority to success in competition.
How much is the Soldier Salute costing? Not a great ROI considering the value of testing the team at Midlands, Scuffle or Vegas is de-prioritized . Who is making the call on program decisions and more importantly who is keeping them accountable? Because the staff, remaining graduates and immediate accessible media seem to be part of the “club”.
Alienation of alumni just adds so much more smoke to it all. Question the club, no constructive criticism welcome, instead the door is over there. Yes men wanted.
I donated to HWC and realized some decisions were a bit frustrating. For years the club was non existent including the last Olympic team trials, the pinnacle of the sport. For example, how long was Sam Stoll rostered? Never competed, how many donations covered his expense? Then we signed Glynn and Moody on, who with all due respect, probably were not the direction. Now we transitioned to a graduating class in which Marinelli has a ceiling, DeSanto could be a factor but also needs to be a 57, Eierman who knows but MMA imminent? Kemmerer was a keeper. Summarizing the better part of a decade where we need more $ but who invested the old $ for those 10 years and chose the club expenditures? Because it seems like personal favorites stick around as a priority to success in competition.
How much is the Soldier Salute costing? Not a great ROI considering the value of testing the team at Midlands, Scuffle or Vegas is de-prioritized . Who is making the call on program decisions and more importantly who is keeping them accountable? Because the staff, remaining graduates and immediate accessible media seem to be part of the “club”.
Alienation of alumni just adds so much more smoke to it all. Question the club, no constructive criticism welcome, instead the door is over there. Yes men wanted.