What's a good post to like ratio?

[RunRonnieRun]

Or is it a like to post ratio? Is this an M1 vs M2 debate? What should I be striving for?

 

[THE_DEVIL]

I don't think we have enough data yet to come to a conclusion on the answer you are seeking. We need to do a study.*







*

 

[Bonerfarts]

1:1 is ok
2:1 is Great
3:1 is Hall of Hame
Over 3:1 is Moral

 

[torbee]

Meh, volume is more important. Just keep throwing s---t at the wall and see what sticks. I have tens of thousands of horrendous posts.

 

[srams21]

One also needs to take into account us older poster who were posting long before the like option came to be.

 

[BelemNole]

One also needs to take into account us older poster who were posting long before the like option came to be.

So you're saying emulate someone with a lot of posts, but with a great ratio? Hmmmmm

 

[ottumwan in tx]

91,096 posts, 11,250 likes

 

[Old_wrestling_fan]

91,096 posts, 11,250 likes

11,251 now. I kinda felt sorry for you since your ratio was so low.

 

[CarolinaHawkeye]

1 to 1000. posts to likes. Now if you post like ping did in this thread the likes become easier to obtain.

 

[IACub]

91,096 posts, 11,250 likes

I liked that just to skew your numbers

 

[coloradonoles]

Do you know how hard it is to have 1:5 ratio? its hard to be that unremarkable. I mean a peanut could have someone like 1 out of every 5 things they say. That or people don't like when you tell them their beliefs are full of shit.

But by all means keep trucking along... most of you are no better than the Sneetches of Dr Suess.

 

[Funky Bunch]

69

 

[Herkmeister]

Or is it a like to post ratio? Is this an M1 vs M2 debate? What should I be striving for?

Let's start with the definition of "humblebrag"...…

 

[Herkmeister]

Or is it a like to post ratio? Is this an M1 vs M2 debate? What should I be striving for?

 

[BelemNole]

Do you know how hard it is to have 1:5 ratio? its hard to be that unremarkable. I mean a peanut could have someone like 1 out of every 5 things they say. That or people don't like when you tell them their beliefs are full of shit.

But by all means keep trucking along... most of you are no better than the Sneetches of Dr Suess.

I think you have it in you go to 1:10.

 

[Flie]

Or is it a like to post ratio? Is this an M1 vs M2 debate? What should I be striving for?

1:1 ish

 

[Legend12]

One also needs to take into account us older poster who were posting long before the like option came to be.

Yep. I've only posted 1,765 times since the "Like" option was installed.

 

[BABiscuit]

I reached the 1:1 ratio at 12,919 posts. Since then, I have received 5,818 likes on 2,171 posts. That's 2.7 likes per post. And I quit trying after getting to 1:1. So you need to be at least 2.5:1 if you are starting fresh. Otherwise GTFO.

 

[Tunadog]

This is now a like whore thread

 

[CadetHawk]

11,251 now. I kinda felt sorry for you since your ratio was so low.

Well in that case......

 

[MplsHawk]

Do you know how hard it is to have 1:5 ratio? its hard to be that unremarkable. I mean a peanut could have someone like 1 out of every 5 things they say. That or people don't like when you tell them their beliefs are full of shit.

But by all means keep trucking along... most of you are no better than the Sneetches of Dr Suess.

When it comes to being unremarkable, you are an amateur.

 

[hawkbirch]

One also needs to take into account us older poster who were posting long before the like option came to be.

this is an excuse lame posters use. Don't be lame.

 

[srams21]

this is an excuse lame posters use. Don't be lame.

Zip it newbie

 

[QChawks]

this is an excuse lame posters use. Don't be lame.

 

[jamesvanderwulf]

1:1 is ok
2:1 is Great
3:1 is Hall of Hame
Over 3:1 is Moral

.5:1 Goal for a Con who doesn't post T & A
1:1 Goal for a Moderate here for the humor ( me ),
who doesn't post gratuitous T & A.
2:1 Minimum for anyone who's part of the left wing
circle jerk and ghey or pseudo ghey.
3:1 Left wing circle jerks, who are also Cub fans and post gratuitous T & A, actual ghey..
4:1 LWCJs who may or not be scandalous skanks,
but imply they are female without proof.
5:1 Avatar/microwave whore, gratuitous T & A poster....

 

[BelemNole]

.5:1 Goal for a Con who doesn't post T & A
1:1 Goal for a Moderate here for the humor ( me ),
who doesn't post gratuitous T & A.
2:1 Minimum for anyone who's part of the left wing
circle jerk and ghey or pseudo ghey.
3:1 Left wing circle jerks, who are also Cub fans and post gratuitous T & A, actual ghey..
4:1 LWCJs who may or not be scandalous skanks,
but imply they are female without proof.
5:1 Avatar/microwave whore, gratuitous T & A poster....

Was calling yourself a moderate part of the humor?

 

[jamesvanderwulf]

Was calling yourself a moderate part of the humor?

100% possibly. No I voted for McGovern, Carter, Perot, Anderson and Paul. Middle of the road as it gets.

 

[JWolf74]

I just got to 1:1, but likes weren' a thing for the first 5000 posts or so (not counting the old handle who got the rivals permaban for a single nipple). So we'll see where it goes from here.

I'm guessing I'm at 2-3:1 like to post kind of poster. Pretty great, really.

 

[hawkbirch]

.5:1 Goal for a Con who doesn't post T & A
1:1 Goal for a Moderate here for the humor ( me ),
who doesn't post gratuitous T & A.
2:1 Minimum for anyone who's part of the left wing
circle jerk and ghey or pseudo ghey.
3:1 Left wing circle jerks, who are also Cub fans and post gratuitous T & A, actual ghey..
4:1 LWCJs who may or not be scandalous skanks,
but imply they are female without proof.
5:1 Avatar/microwave whore, gratuitous T & A poster....

challenge accepted.

While the excuses keep piling up, I'd like to note that I've never posted a picture of a boob or a butt ever and yet I'm still rocking an awesome ratio.

 

[torbee]

100% possibly. No I voted for McGovern, Carter, Perot, Anderson and Paul. Middle of the road as it gets.

Are you sure it's not early-onset schizophrenia?

 

[jasonrann]

I have been on here a long damn time, but am almost to 1:1.

 

[JWolf74]

challenge accepted.

While the excuses keep piling up, I'd like to note that I've never posted a picture of a boob or a butt ever and yet I'm still rocking an awesome ratio.

Could you imagine how good your ratio would be if you did? Jus sayin'

 

[QChawks]

1:1 should be the bare min

 

[JWolf74]

challenge accepted.

While the excuses keep piling up, I'd like to note that I've never posted a picture of a boob or a butt ever and yet I'm still rocking an awesome ratio.

3 years later still no pics. Just think how gooder your ratio would be.

 

[hawkifann]

1:1 should be the bare min

Meh...I've gone from 20-25k posts before likes to better than a 1:3 ratio. I'll never catch up from more than a decade of posting pre-like button.

 

[runkpanole]

1:1 should be the bare min

I like my slightly better than 1.5:1 ratio.

 

[Moral]

1:1 is ok
2:1 is Great
3:1 is Hall of Hame
Over 3:1 is Moral, Bonerfarts

FIFY

 

[JWolf74]

Meh...I've gone from 20-25k posts before likes to better than a 1:3 ratio. I'll never catch up from more than a decade of posting pre-like button.

Not with that attitude and lack of Tn'A

 

[FlickShagwell]

Or is it a like to post ratio? Is this an M1 vs M2 debate? What should I be striving for?

Look at @NCHawk5 ‘s ratio. You want the opposite of that.

 

[NCHawk5]

Look at @NCHawk5 ‘s ratio. You want the opposite of that.

Obsessed