Who won the Walz v Vance debate?
- Thread starter binsfeldcyhawk2
- Start date
He fact checked her? So you’re saying he isn’t lying about the Haitians? You are the most delusional guy I’ve ever met. Mr Harvard.
Your one good point is that the VP breaks Senate ties (which Kamala did in the misnomer of the Inflation Reduction Bill aka the Green New Deal), so that right there disqualifies her for a higher office.
Last edited:
I gather you must have believed Harris should had done more as Vice President, given your criticisms of her for not being particularly impressive in the role. But, if we're being honest, it seems you don't find any recent Vice President all that remarkable. I find it curious that people often point out Harris's lackluster performance as if it's an anomaly, when in reality, most VPs aren’t particularly impressive—and that's largely by design.
Yet, they’ve essentially kept Walz away from the media after he became VP candidate. 🤔
You probably think Trump won his debate as well.
I somewhat agree, but they are a heart beat away from the presidency, so the public needs to know that a VP candidate at least has a grasp of the bigger issues.
Regardless of all your above rhetoric, even left leaning media today is saying that Vance won last night’s VP debate.
Enlighten me…how was Walz “pretty clear” about fibbing on his final military rank?
Or
Or, as Vance said…he changed his mind on Trump after he saw how he did in his first term. 🤔
Trump assigned Pence the task of curing cancer. How’d that work out?
We wouldn't know yet. We haven't seen any truth from Bonespurs the Draft Dodger. Ever heard of The Big Lie? Sad.
The Walz thing from 30 years ago? Meh. Not the same as not answering if Trump lost the election.
It was kind of funny because the two ditzy moderators were actually wrong on the topic that they “fact checked” Vance on.
First…that so-called border bill was crap legislation. Secondly. Biden won the 2020 election. However, if the media would have reported on the Hunter laptop prior to the 2020 election, then those election results may have been different.
Yes. Technically many of the border crossers are not here illegally. But they do not have permission to be here.
They aren't eligible for deportation as the country they came from isn't safe to send them back to. Now, in time, they may be approved to be here. Hence the word temporary.
I suspect you'd feel somewhat different if 10,000 people showed up to your small town of Dubuque within a very short period. Many of whom were not English speaking and were using all of the community resources designed for Dubuque.
Now America is a generous place that has historically taken in many of the worlds refugees. Which many of these people are no doubt. But they should be relocated in a much more intelligent manner in such a way as to minimize local impact and give the refugees the best chance of assimilation.
Keep on trying Cletus... it's fun watching you try to defend the indefensible.
And Walz came across as a grumpy old man. While he is “only” 60, Timmy looks much older than that.
Or a respectable woman that just wants Bonespurs to grab her by the pussy. He can do it you know, and there's nothing they can do about it.
Because Trump is NOT a politician; perhaps that’s his appeal. None of the “slick” politician BS.
Hummm…Biden assigned Kamala the border…which she failed on, so there’s that.
If a woman can’t push his unwanted hand away and call him a jerk, then they’re not much of a strong, independent woman. 😉
No, because once anyone of sound mind read that bill they knew it still allowed too many illegal migrants to enter this country b4 it kicked it.
While the term “czar” wasn’t used she was assigned to find the root cause of such large # of crossings and work to secure the border. She failed miserably.
lol…the council member who says…we haven’t seen the proof. Well, no shit…the “proof” has already been eaten by the Haitians. 🤮
