You love arguing semantics. It's tiring. Lol at SandfortI’m not saying it is. I’m saying Tony Perkins and Payton Sanford and the rest of the Hawks are athletic.
You love arguing semantics. It's tiring. Lol at SandfortI’m not saying it is. I’m saying Tony Perkins and Payton Sanford and the rest of the Hawks are athletic.
Mental toughness right there.Go look at that princeton team
Aint happening. Slow white kids is frans MO.Watching the tournament, I see all these fast/super athletic players at every position going to piddly-ass small schools and it frustrates me we hardly ever get ONE player like that, much less a whole team. Why is that? Is it a Fran thing (doesn't want/can't recruit) or simply an Iowa thing (education requirements/NIU/location in the country/etc)?
I do. Words usage matters. It differentiates a well-thought out argument from lazy emoting.You love arguing semantics. It's tiring. Lol at Sandfort
Personally I don’t think Perkins is what I consider super athletic…
Some word usage doesn't need to be clarified because people have common sense. When you're on a college basketball board and someone says a player "isn't athletic", they are obviously saying it in the context of college basketball players. Not the general population as a whole. No need to waste your time when everyone understands this.I do. Words usage matters. It differentiates a well-thought out argument from lazy emoting.
It’s tiring for me too. But I try to do my part in all areas to improve things.
Do you think Sandfort is athletic?
ThisMost of our recruits look better suited to be on a swim team. We started 5 white dudes recently. That hasn’t happened since the 50’s!!! And people wonder why we are perennial garbage! WE LOOK MORE LIKE A YMCA D LEAGUE TEAM EVERY DAMN YEAR!!
Fran is a racist, that’s why he recruits only white players. Oh wait…..that’s not true. Starting 5 white guys is a lie. Guess what? That makes you the racist !Most of our recruits look better suited to be on a swim team. We started 5 white dudes recently. That hasn’t happened since the 50’s!!! And people wonder why we are perennial garbage! WE LOOK MORE LIKE A YMCA D LEAGUE TEAM EVERY DAMN YEAR!!
Some word usage doesn't need to be clarified because people have common sense. When you're on a college basketball board and someone says a player "isn't athletic", they are obviously saying it in the context of college basketball players. Not the general population as a whole. No need to waste your time when everyone understands this.
No, Sandfort is not athletic in comparison to other college basketball players.
No it does not. He had 3 nba draft picks on one team a couple years ago and it was still the same results.Does it really matter who Fran gets if he doesn’t emphasize defense? When Fran realizes defense wins games when the offense is struggling then Iowa will get to another level. For now, expect the current results.
So what qualifies as "athletic"?But is he “athletic”?
Or St. Mary's.Go look at that princeton team
Ding ding ding! We have a winner!So what qualifies as "athletic"?
See my post earlier in this thread:So what qualifies as "athletic"?
Someone with blazing speed & a freakish vertical & mad handles? Or in other words....
Even the smaller schools in the tourney have better athletes that we do…..quick guys with good enough handles to get by their defenders & finish consistently. Perkins & Ulis are ok, but neither has above average quickness or handles. Bowen has potential but not strong enough yet.Oh cmon. It's fine to say that Fran can't close on great recruits. He's usually in on great athletes early, but loses the race when good recruiters at good programs swoop in.
Fran's certainly not a closer. But to say he he's not even looking for athletic recruits is a completely lazy take.
This…..he’s a strong driver if he has a lane & can lower his shoulder, but not fluid enough to get by a good defender.Personally I don’t think Perkins is what I consider super athletic (not compared to power 5 guards). He’s a power leaper and really not that fluid. There are plenty of guys who are “in line” powerful but laterally poor, he is one.
Yeah if you measured his vertical, it’s good, but he’s not much with the ball in his hands. It’s the reason why he’s more miss than hit.
Perkins has severe limitations. Not a guard you hand the keys to.This…..he’s a strong driver if he has a lane & can lower his shoulder, but not fluid enough to get by a good defender.
Are you so senile you can't remember two years ago? They started 5 white guys right on the heels of the football racial bias PR mess which was fantastic optics. It was 4 white guys and Joe T the year before. Fran needs more athletic guys regardless of race but they definitely marched out 5 white starters recently. One of those was an injured Connor who was close to worthless down the stretch in 21Are you counting the Murrys since They're half white, because one of them has been starting for the last two years. Perkins or Ulis has been starting the last 1 1/2 so when exactly is "recently"?
Side bar but he’s been a great addition to the Warriors this year - love his defense as well. Surprisingly good offense to boot. Great motor.Some white guy also dominated the NCAA championship game a few years ago. Divincenzo? Literally blocked two black guys above the rim and put up 30. But I get it, there are far more black guys doing that than whites.
Donte DivencenzoSide bar but he’s been a great addition to the Warriors this year - love his defense as well. Surprisingly good offense to boot. Great motor.
There are reasons they are at "piddly-ass small schools"Watching the tournament, I see all these fast/super athletic players at every position going to piddly-ass small schools and it frustrates me we hardly ever get ONE player like that, much less a whole team. Why is that? Is it a Fran thing (doesn't want/can't recruit) or simply an Iowa thing (education requirements/NIU/location in the country/etc)?
That's why we have all those national championship banners hanging in Carver...............................Every one of our players is athletic.
JFC!