I don't understand your comment. Your cites explain why our cons are wrong. As I said.Because that's what they told everyone. Why don't you want believe it?
https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-r...ntech-conclude-phase-3-study-covid-19-vaccine
- Primary efficacy analysis demonstrates BNT162b2 to be 95% effective against COVID-19 beginning 28 days after the first dose;170 confirmed cases of COVID-19 were evaluated, with 162 observed in the placebo group versus 8 in the vaccine group
It is imperative to dispel any ambiguity about how vaccine efficacy shown in trials translates into protecting individuals and populations. The mRNA-based Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were shown to have 94–95% efficacy in preventing symptomatic COVID-19, calculated as 100 × (1 minus the attack rate with vaccine divided by the attack rate with placebo).
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00075-X/fulltext#:~:text=vaccines were shown to have,the attack rate with placebo).
How well it works: Moderna’s initial Phase 3 clinical data in December 2020 was similar to Pfizer-BioNTech’s—at that point, both vaccines showed about 95% efficacy for prevention of COVID-19. Later data on real-world effectiveness for adults showed that the protection from the mRNA two-dose primary series wanes over time, but booster doses bring the immune system back to robust levels.
https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/covid-19-vaccine-comparison
The part of your comment directed at me was probably just facetiousness. Which I would ordinarily appreciate. But this is HROT, so it isn't always possible to tell.