Troll alert.
Is that what you call people that challenge your skewed opinions? Oh the horror someone thinks differently! 🤣
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Troll alert.
It's easily the most vile sh!t I've seen here, and this place is disgusting.
Neither. JFC - you're a god damned troll or a dumb MF. Probably both.Hey piece of sh!t, who gives consent if they’re both children?
Neither. JFC - you're a god damned troll or a dumb MF. Probably both.
A ten year-old can’t consent to sex. Whether the other party was capable of consent is immaterial.Show where an article has said it was rape or identified the father. I’ll wait..
If the boy was 12 and it was consensual?In what world is it not rape?
It's non-consensual sex. What would you call it?So then it’s automatically rape? Wow…who’s the rapist?
You should. Do you believe, under any circumstance, a 10 year old should be forced to carry a pregnancy to term?If the boy was 12 and it was consensual?
I’m probably going to regret this….
That wasn’t the question I was answering in the post…JFC. Just asking if it’s “rape” if the father is 12 and it was consensual.You should. Do you believe, under any circumstance, a 10 year old should be forced to carry a pregnancy to term?
If the boy was 12 and it was consensual?
I’m probably going to regret this….
If the boy was 12 and it was consensual?
I’m probably going to regret this….
Which is why I asked you the specific question. So you agree, in this case, that an abortion should be an option in her state? What if she was 12? Or 14? Where do you draw the line?That wasn’t the question I was answering in the post…JFC. Just asking if it’s “rape” if the father is 12 and it was consensual.
No she shouldn’t have to carry to term.
Good lord this board is starting to get unbearable
Ok….is it rape if he was 12? 12 isn’t old enough to consent either.You should regret that post. She couldn't consent regardless of the other's age. Jesus christ.
So the 12 year old gets charged with rape?There is no consensual sex happening in the US involving a 10 year old. Period. No exceptions.
Because a state is forcing a 10 year old to have a baby.Ok….is it rape if he was 12? 12 isn’t old enough to consent either.
I’m not really understanding why people are getting triggered by this…seriously.
Does it really fvcking matter if it’s rape or not? FFSOk….is it rape if he was 12? 12 isn’t old enough to consent either.
I’m not really understanding why people are getting triggered by this…seriously.
You're missing the point entirely. No one has suggested a 12 year old should be charged with rape. No one knows if a 12 year old is even involved. We do know a 10 year old is being forced by their state to have a baby.So the 12 year old gets charged with rape?
I get that a 10 year old is two young to consent but neither is the 12 year old.
Draw what line? I think it should be available in cases of rape/incest as a minimum.Which is why I asked you the specific question. So you agree, in this case, that an abortion should be an option in her state? What if she was 12? Or 14? Where do you draw the line?
The line in your hypothetical case - no rape but 10 year old impregnated. Do you force that 10 year old to have the baby?Draw what line? I think it should be available in cases of rape/incest as a minimum.
Where’s the line to have to follow the law in a particular state? Probably age of consent.
I think a 6 week ban is too restrictive across the board FWIW
Which wasn’t the point of my post.Because a state is forcing a 10 year old to have a baby.
Or hear us out. Roe v Wade shouldn't have been overturned by a corrupt illegitimate SCOTUSDraw what line? I think it should be available in cases of rape/incest as a minimum.
Where’s the line to have to follow the law in a particular state? Probably age of consent.
I think a 6 week ban is too restrictive across the board FWIW
They are both open to statutory rape charges.So the 12 year old gets charged with rape?
I get that a 10 year old is two young to consent but neither is the 12 year old.
WTF? It's the point of the whole thread.Which wasn’t the point of my post.
Is it rape if a 10 and 12 year old was the original question….which has nothing to her being made to carry to term….which is wrong IMO.
I feel like I’m in bazarro world right now 🤣
From everything I have read it is unclear. I did see it stated that if the minor is 16 years old then it would be statutory rape.Which wasn’t the point of my post.
Is it rape if a 10 and 12 year old was the original question….which has nothing to her being made to carry to term….which is wrong IMO.
I feel like I’m in bazarro world right now 🤣
No.Does it really fvcking matter if it’s rape or not? FFS
It’s pretty clear, backwoods redneck state forces 10 year old to carry rape baby to term.From everything I have read it is unclear. I did see it stated that if the minor is 16 years old then it would be statutory rape.
….and I said she shouldn’t be made to carry to term. WTF is the problemYou're missing the point entirely. No one has suggested a 12 year old should be charged with rape. No one knows if a 12 year old is even involved. We do know a 10 year old is being forced by their state to have a baby.
I 100 percent agree.It’s pretty clear, backwoods redneck state forces 10 year old to carry rape baby to term.
Maybe read the room? I get the logic of your question, but what does the hypothetical add to the matter at hand?No.
I just answered the question “in what world is it not rape”
Good lord….
Your complaints.….and I said she shouldn’t be made to carry to term. WTF is the problem
No. I think I’ve answered that a few times now.The line in your hypothetical case - no rape but 10 year old impregnated. Do you force that 10 year old to have the baby?
It was and we’re dealing with realityOr hear us out. Roe v Wade shouldn't have been overturned by a corrupt illegitimate SCOTUS
No, this isn't a political tool. This is pointing out real life ramifications to the GQP's Theocratic extreme political ploys.Imagine using a 10 year old rape victim as a political tool. Smh
Didn’t know that….that’s why I asked the original question.They are both open to statutory rape charges.
Not the point of the post I responded to which was…WTF? It's the point of the whole thread.
FIFYThat wasn’t the question I was answering in the post…JFC. Just asking if it’s “rape” if the father is 12 and it was consensual.
No she shouldn’t have to carry to term.
Good lord this country is starting to get unbearable
ThanksFrom everything I have read it is unclear. I did see it stated that if the minor is 16 years old then it would be statutory rape.
Agreed. There is a lot of emotion on here right now because of Roe v Wade. I have been guilty of it as well.Thanks
Appreciate a straight forward response to my question. Seems to be a difficult thing to come by on the board lately….