ADVERTISEMENT

30 Years ago...

Almost everyone I know is in the middle class and they are all doing just fine. Weird I know.
If you look at people who are doing well then, unsurprisingly, most seem to be doing well.

If you look at the people who are being left behind, some will still be in the middle class - for now. But wealth inequality is and has been rising for a while now.

Complacency = Complicity
 
If you look at people who are doing well then, unsurprisingly, most seem to be doing well.

If you look at the people who are being left behind, some will still be in the middle class - for now. But wealth inequality is and has been rising for a while now.

Complacency = Complicity
Doesn't mean you can't go out, work hard and make a nice happy life for yourself in the middle class.
 
The wealthy have been faced with this choice:

1. Pay more tax to fight climate change in an effort to make the planet safe for everyone;

--OR--

2. Pay less tax, use that money to make chunks of the planet safe for themselves, and screw everyone else.

Conveniently, there's a party representing each point of view.

Funny how that works.
 
Billionaires aren’t just supporting Trump for the tax cuts.
As Peter Thiel once admitted: “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.”

Robert Reich should read Federalist Paper #10.

Madison figured that shit out 236 years ago:

From this view of the subject it may be concluded that a pure democracy, by which I mean a society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person, can admit of no cure for the mischiefs of faction. A common passion or interest will, in almost every case, be felt by a majority of the whole; a communication and concert result from the form of government itself; and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths. Theoretic politicians, who have patronized this species of government, have erroneously supposed that by reducing mankind to a perfect equality in their political rights, they would, at the same time, be perfectly equalized and assimilated in their possessions, their opinions, and their passions.
 
The wealthy have been faced with this choice:

1. Pay more tax to fight climate change in an effort to make the planet safe for everyone;

--OR--

2. Pay less tax, use that money to make chunks of the planet safe for themselves, and screw everyone else.

Conveniently, there's a party representing each point of view.

Funny how that works.

I need to rewatch Don't Look Up.
 
Robert Reich should read Federalist Paper #10.

Madison figured that shit out 236 years ago:

From this view of the subject it may be concluded that a pure democracy, by which I mean a society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person, can admit of no cure for the mischiefs of faction. A common passion or interest will, in almost every case, be felt by a majority of the whole; a communication and concert result from the form of government itself; and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths. Theoretic politicians, who have patronized this species of government, have erroneously supposed that by reducing mankind to a perfect equality in their political rights, they would, at the same time, be perfectly equalized and assimilated in their possessions, their opinions, and their passions.

YOU should probably read it. Because you are missing the key points there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Torg and TheCainer
The United States has been operating under Democrat policies and control for nearly 70% of the time since that speech. Is it any surprise people are angry, disgusted and the middle class is under attack? But Trump.
Bush Jr's invasion of Iraq is the single biggest blunder of any politician since Nam. The psychological and financial damage done to the country will take a generation to wipe away. The Patriot Act was and is still criminal and zero presidents did away with it.

The Supreme Court got loaded up with right wing Jack wads. Citizen's United is a huge problem.

Clinton should own the housing bubble of 2008, but Bush Jr did nothing to stop it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Torg and TheCainer
GV_feKRWkAADT3Y
Plucking out the chart that should make a lot of jaws drop.

Basically if you aren't in the top 1% you're going to be worse off.

And the worse off you are now, the even more worse off you're going to be.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT