Careful it's going to get locked.
I've noticed multiple threads being locked recently, and none of them have really been out of control.Previous thread, for some reason now locked
Alina Habba, attorney for the worst President in history
She's someone who watched Boston Legal/Night Court once or twice and thought, "I can do that!"iowa.forums.rivals.com
rent freeI look forward to Both-Sides-Bins post tomorrow with an epic both sides revelation where Biden politely returned an overcooked steak while he was in the Senate. BOTH SIDES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They all do it.....
You talking about those minorities trump wouldn't let stay in his units? Both sides that one for me real quick.rent free
noYou talking about those minorities trump wouldn't let stay in his units? Both sides that one for me real quick.
This is why the Judge ordered that the jurors remain anonymous.
Didn't realize it already went thru the "court of appeals."
Funny that he gets mad at her for a common courtesy standard in the legal profession. The first CORRECT thing she's done from the start.
Alina... hubba hubba?She is not good at her job....but still would
I’m guilty of several things now myself.
Shouldn’t the judge have recused himself. Two of the plaintiff’s lawyers clerked for him and he officiated one of their weddings.This is why the Judge ordered that the jurors remain anonymous.
Shouldn’t the judge have recused himself. Two of the plaintiff’s lawyers clerked for him and he officiated one of their weddings.
That somebody was probably her father........
Serious question.
He doesn’t have an answer.Serious question.
Identify the “preferential treatment” they were given.Serious question.
You clearly have very little experience working in and around courtrooms.Serious question.
![]()
Trump lawyer alleges conflict of interest in E. Jean Carroll defamation case
A defense lawyer for former US President Donald Trump filed a letter in US District Court on Monday that argued a judge in a recent defamation lawsuit should have recused himself from the case. The le...www.jurist.org
No idea if this is true, but if it is, the question shouldn’t be dismissed with a glass of wine and an eye roll by a prepubescent tick turd.
That’s a good thing, IMO.You clearly have very little experience working in and around courtrooms.
Sure why not?That’s a good thing, IMO.
Yes they work together, but officiate their wedding?
To answer your question, meaning I haven’t had to appear in court.Sure why not?
They exist in the same professional and social circles.
I wonder if they took him on lavish vacations?That’s a good thing, IMO.
Yes they work together, but officiate their wedding?
Probably polished his knob.I wonder if they took him on lavish vacations?
If he did it as a friend, and not just some Jane and John off the street wanting to be married.I officiated over 100 weddings while being magistrate. Is he saying I'm precluded from being part of any litigation from any of those individuals?
So naive
If he did it as a friend, and not just some Jane and John off the street wanting to be married.
That could be something they try to appeal, I suppose.If he did it as a friend, and not just some Jane and John off the street wanting to be married.
Okay, fine. That’s what I was asking. I saw they were going at that angle and wanted to know. Thanks for the answer and a little less condescension?Whats the difference? The Code allows for it.