It's not you it's me > ConstansaFrom DM Reigster. Sounds like PT and nothing else.
http://www.hawkcentral.com/story/sp...ring-hawkeye-program-fran-mccaffery/82485160/
It's not you it's me > ConstansaFrom DM Reigster. Sounds like PT and nothing else.
http://www.hawkcentral.com/story/sp...ring-hawkeye-program-fran-mccaffery/82485160/
You know what? Not everything in college athletics is about winning. Sometimes it's just important to do the right thing.please enlighten me. Iowa needs some guards so they need to go out and get a couple for next year. Can't do that and give Baer a scholarship. Am I wrong? If you can't get two guards this offseason then by all means give it to Baer. If you don't think Iowa needs some experienced guards then you didn't pay good enough attention this past year.
You can certainly tell the "Iowa nice" crowd in here, you get a good break, and find a rotation caliber walk on, that's the time to try to use it to your advantage, not use the first available scholarship on someone already on your team. I'd much rather take a shot on finding a high caliber guard who could be a real difference maker and elevate the program, but I guess lil Nicky's feelings should really come first.
I saw him enjoying Johnson County's finest chicken this evening with Wagner, and would have bet you $100 he was not leaving. Color me shocked.
They should take a look at Christian Kessee.
I saw him enjoying Johnson County's finest chicken this evening with Wagner, and would have bet you $100 he was not leaving. Color me shocked.
Were you at the Vine? Are they even still open? Man they had good wings. I thought I remembered the one on Gilbert closing but the one on the strip staying open?
Why should Iowa have to rely on "high quality walk-ons"? I'll take scholly players, preferably from Chicago/Detroit/StL metro area.Baer has earned a scholarship. Good luck getting any other high-quality walk-ons to come to Iowa if a proven major contributor isn't given a scholarship.
They are not incompatible.Why should Iowa have to rely on "high quality walk-ons"? I'll take scholly players, preferably from Chicago/Detroit/StL metro area.
Your grammar comes out sounding like an old movie rendition of a Native American.
I guess what is best for the team just goes out the door then? sorry but no
Nobody said anything about "relying" on walk-ons. You need walk-ons to fill out a roster, every school has them and they contribute at a number of schools. Kids like Baer pass up other scholarship opportunities for a chance to play at a high level and earn themselves a scholarship. He has proven himself to be better than a number of our scholarship players, he has earned himself a scholarship. Seems like an awfully Tom Creanish move to not reward the kid for being better than the kids that you deemed worthy of scholarships. That would make Baer a scholarship-worthy player, no?Why should Iowa have to rely on "high quality walk-ons"? I'll take scholly players, preferably from Chicago/Detroit/StL metro area.
This is a big fail for us. The kid was dialed into one of the HS programs in the country.
It also hurts our already razor thin guard court. We have two natural guards and a swing in Peter. One, Brady, showed himself largely unprepared for B!G ball. The other, Christian, didn't play enough to get a real handle on his ability.
How will this look if Moss can't get or stay eligible?
We are all well aware of Fran's track record landing high caliber guards sans Peter Jok (Marble was originally a Lickliter recruit). Don't you think Fran already is and has been going for those type of players. At this point now that there's 2 open scholly's it would be both foolish and a bit disrespectful not to give 1 of them to Baer whom continues to outperform several players still on scholarship.
You must not have a career position that requires personnel decisions, or your employees would hate you and your chances for success would be extremely low.If we can keep Baer here without one, don't see why we need to waste one on him when we could potentially get a much better player with it.
You must not have a career position that requires personnel decisions, or your employees would hate you and your chances for success would be extremely low.
So as a person who makes personnel decisions, wouldn't you try to bring in the best talent you can? Guess I don't get why people are saying he has to give Baer a scholarship even if it means passing on a better player. Sure you're loyal to your employees but if you have openings you always look for the best talent internally and externally.You must not have a career position that requires personnel decisions, or your employees would hate you and your chances for success would be extremely low.
Why should This Thread rely on Vine being closed or openThe original Vine is closed?
So as a person who makes personnel decisions, wouldn't you try to bring in the best talent you can? Guess I don't get why people are saying he has to give Baer a scholarship even if it means passing on a better player. Sure you're loyal to your employees but if you have openings you always look for the best talent internally and externally.
If you have valuable employees, do you reward them with raises or opportunities for advancement, when possible? If not, your chances of developing a successful team aren't going to be very good.So as a person who makes personnel decisions, wouldn't you try to bring in the best talent you can? Guess I don't get why people are saying he has to give Baer a scholarship even if it means passing on a better player. Sure you're loyal to your employees but if you have openings you always look for the best talent internally and externally.
after the 1st one. Do you want McCaffery to give up his too, so we can have 15 scholarship type players?
At least Ellison is staying........................................
You can seldom or never know who was best, only who was satisfactory.So as a person who makes personnel decisions, wouldn't you try to bring in the best talent you can? Guess I don't get why people are saying he has to give Baer a scholarship even if it means passing on a better player. Sure you're loyal to your employees but if you have openings you always look for the best talent internally and externally.
We don't have a player by that name.
JesusOkay, I'm not trying to be the grammar police, but I can't ignore this one since it seems you made the effort to use whom in a sentence. No offense. Whom is the objective form of who, which means it is used in a prepositional phrase (of whom, for whom, to whom) or when receiving the action (..not to give one to Baer whom I watched play basketball for Iowa this season).
Otherwise, use who. "...Baer who continues to outperform several players..."
Again, nothing personal. Fwiw, I think a lot of your comments are spot on, so I'm really not trying to be a dick.
At least Ellison is staying........................................